TY - JOUR
T1 - Noninvasive assessment of cardiac outut by brachial occlusion-cuff technique
T2 - Comparison with the open-circuit acetylene washin method
AU - Sajgalik, Pavol
AU - Kremen, Vaclav
AU - Carlson, Alex R.
AU - Fabian, Vratislav
AU - Kim, Chul Ho
AU - Wheatley, Courtney
AU - Gerla, Vaclav
AU - Schirger, John A.
AU - Olson, Thomas P.
AU - Johnson, Bruce D.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-71478, an institutional grant from Mayo Clinic Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, and by institutional resources for research by Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.
PY - 2016/12
Y1 - 2016/12
N2 - Cardiac output (CO) assessment as a basic hemodynamic parameter has been of interest in exercise physiology, cardiology, and anesthesiology. Noninvasive techniques available are technically challenging, and thus difficult to use outside of a clinical or laboratory setting. We propose a novel method of noninvasive CO assessment using a single, upper-arm cuff. The method uses the arterial pressure pulse wave signal acquired from the brachial artery during 20-s intervals of suprasystolic occlusion. This method was evaluated in a cohort of 12 healthy individuals (age, 27.7 ± 5.4 yr, 50% men) and compared with an established method for noninvasive CO assessment, the open-circuit acetylene method (OpCirc) at rest, and during low- to moderate-intensity exercise. CO increased from rest to exercise (rest, 7.4 ± 0.8 vs. 7.2 ± 0.8; low, 9.8 ± 1.8 vs. 9.9 ± 2.0; moderate, 14.1 ± 2.8 vs. 14.8 ± 3.2 l/min) as assessed by the cuff-occlusion and OpCirc techniques, respectively. The average error of experimental technique compared with OpCirc was -0.25 ± 1.02 l/min, Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.96 (rest + exercise), and 0.21 ± 0.42 l/min with Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.87 (rest only). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between methods (within 95% boundaries); the reproducibility coefficient (RPC) = 0.84 l/min with R2 = 0.75 at rest and RPC = 2 l/min with R2 = 0.92 at rest and during exercise, respectively. In comparison with an established method to quantify CO, the cuff-occlusion method provides similar measures at rest and with light to moderate exercise. Thus, we believe this method has the potential to be used as a new, noninvasive method for assessing CO during exercise.
AB - Cardiac output (CO) assessment as a basic hemodynamic parameter has been of interest in exercise physiology, cardiology, and anesthesiology. Noninvasive techniques available are technically challenging, and thus difficult to use outside of a clinical or laboratory setting. We propose a novel method of noninvasive CO assessment using a single, upper-arm cuff. The method uses the arterial pressure pulse wave signal acquired from the brachial artery during 20-s intervals of suprasystolic occlusion. This method was evaluated in a cohort of 12 healthy individuals (age, 27.7 ± 5.4 yr, 50% men) and compared with an established method for noninvasive CO assessment, the open-circuit acetylene method (OpCirc) at rest, and during low- to moderate-intensity exercise. CO increased from rest to exercise (rest, 7.4 ± 0.8 vs. 7.2 ± 0.8; low, 9.8 ± 1.8 vs. 9.9 ± 2.0; moderate, 14.1 ± 2.8 vs. 14.8 ± 3.2 l/min) as assessed by the cuff-occlusion and OpCirc techniques, respectively. The average error of experimental technique compared with OpCirc was -0.25 ± 1.02 l/min, Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.96 (rest + exercise), and 0.21 ± 0.42 l/min with Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.87 (rest only). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between methods (within 95% boundaries); the reproducibility coefficient (RPC) = 0.84 l/min with R2 = 0.75 at rest and RPC = 2 l/min with R2 = 0.92 at rest and during exercise, respectively. In comparison with an established method to quantify CO, the cuff-occlusion method provides similar measures at rest and with light to moderate exercise. Thus, we believe this method has the potential to be used as a new, noninvasive method for assessing CO during exercise.
KW - Brachial cuff
KW - Cardiac output
KW - Noninvasive
KW - Occlusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007424244&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007424244&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00981.2015
DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00981.2015
M3 - Article
C2 - 27765846
AN - SCOPUS:85007424244
SN - 8750-7587
VL - 121
SP - 1319
EP - 1325
JO - Journal of Applied Physiology
JF - Journal of Applied Physiology
IS - 6
ER -