Nonendoscopic Placement and Use of Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tubes in Pigs (Sus scrofa domestica)

Naomi M Gades, Timothy D. Mandrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Swine have supplanted dogs and other large animal species in many biomedical applications and have become the model of choice for numerous areas of research. Anatomic, behavioral, and handling concerns often require pigs to be surgically instrumented for many procedures. Oral dosing in pigs can be accomplished by feeding substances in a palatable substrate, temporarily placing an oral or nasal gastric tube, or permanent surgical placement of an esophagostomy or gastrostomy tube. Oral and nasal gastric tube placement is difficult in conscious, unrestrained animals and is suitable only for short-term enteral access. Placing esophagostomy and gastrostomy tubes is suitable for long-term enteral access and allows easy and rapid administration of substances directly into the stomach. However, these methods frequently require major surgical manipulation for placement. Nonendoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement is used in companion animals to establish permanent or temporary enteral access. We successfully have adapted this procedure in swine as a method for short-term enteral access. This technique has several advantages over the traditional surgical method for gastrostomy tube placement. It is minimally invasive, results in less animal pain and distress, requires less procedural and recovery time, and is inexpensive. Disadvantages include the potential for splenic entrapment, splenic penetration, perforation of the esophagus, and other complications related to misplacement of the tube or applicator. This paper describes the equipment, technique, and potential complications for placing a nonendoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy tube in swine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-39
Number of pages3
JournalContemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science
Volume40
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sus scrofa
Gastrostomy
Swine
Small Intestine
Esophagostomy
swine
mouth
Stomach
stomach
Nose
methodology
animals
Pets
esophagus
distress
pets
Esophagus
pain
Dogs
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Nonendoscopic Placement and Use of Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tubes in Pigs (Sus scrofa domestica). / Gades, Naomi M; Mandrell, Timothy D.

In: Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science, Vol. 40, No. 2, 03.2001, p. 37-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{22b0b241d2ae458b8685cc342594bd4d,
title = "Nonendoscopic Placement and Use of Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tubes in Pigs (Sus scrofa domestica)",
abstract = "Swine have supplanted dogs and other large animal species in many biomedical applications and have become the model of choice for numerous areas of research. Anatomic, behavioral, and handling concerns often require pigs to be surgically instrumented for many procedures. Oral dosing in pigs can be accomplished by feeding substances in a palatable substrate, temporarily placing an oral or nasal gastric tube, or permanent surgical placement of an esophagostomy or gastrostomy tube. Oral and nasal gastric tube placement is difficult in conscious, unrestrained animals and is suitable only for short-term enteral access. Placing esophagostomy and gastrostomy tubes is suitable for long-term enteral access and allows easy and rapid administration of substances directly into the stomach. However, these methods frequently require major surgical manipulation for placement. Nonendoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement is used in companion animals to establish permanent or temporary enteral access. We successfully have adapted this procedure in swine as a method for short-term enteral access. This technique has several advantages over the traditional surgical method for gastrostomy tube placement. It is minimally invasive, results in less animal pain and distress, requires less procedural and recovery time, and is inexpensive. Disadvantages include the potential for splenic entrapment, splenic penetration, perforation of the esophagus, and other complications related to misplacement of the tube or applicator. This paper describes the equipment, technique, and potential complications for placing a nonendoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy tube in swine.",
author = "Gades, {Naomi M} and Mandrell, {Timothy D.}",
year = "2001",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "37--39",
journal = "Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science",
issn = "1559-6109",
publisher = "American Association for Laboratory Animal Science",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonendoscopic Placement and Use of Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tubes in Pigs (Sus scrofa domestica)

AU - Gades, Naomi M

AU - Mandrell, Timothy D.

PY - 2001/3

Y1 - 2001/3

N2 - Swine have supplanted dogs and other large animal species in many biomedical applications and have become the model of choice for numerous areas of research. Anatomic, behavioral, and handling concerns often require pigs to be surgically instrumented for many procedures. Oral dosing in pigs can be accomplished by feeding substances in a palatable substrate, temporarily placing an oral or nasal gastric tube, or permanent surgical placement of an esophagostomy or gastrostomy tube. Oral and nasal gastric tube placement is difficult in conscious, unrestrained animals and is suitable only for short-term enteral access. Placing esophagostomy and gastrostomy tubes is suitable for long-term enteral access and allows easy and rapid administration of substances directly into the stomach. However, these methods frequently require major surgical manipulation for placement. Nonendoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement is used in companion animals to establish permanent or temporary enteral access. We successfully have adapted this procedure in swine as a method for short-term enteral access. This technique has several advantages over the traditional surgical method for gastrostomy tube placement. It is minimally invasive, results in less animal pain and distress, requires less procedural and recovery time, and is inexpensive. Disadvantages include the potential for splenic entrapment, splenic penetration, perforation of the esophagus, and other complications related to misplacement of the tube or applicator. This paper describes the equipment, technique, and potential complications for placing a nonendoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy tube in swine.

AB - Swine have supplanted dogs and other large animal species in many biomedical applications and have become the model of choice for numerous areas of research. Anatomic, behavioral, and handling concerns often require pigs to be surgically instrumented for many procedures. Oral dosing in pigs can be accomplished by feeding substances in a palatable substrate, temporarily placing an oral or nasal gastric tube, or permanent surgical placement of an esophagostomy or gastrostomy tube. Oral and nasal gastric tube placement is difficult in conscious, unrestrained animals and is suitable only for short-term enteral access. Placing esophagostomy and gastrostomy tubes is suitable for long-term enteral access and allows easy and rapid administration of substances directly into the stomach. However, these methods frequently require major surgical manipulation for placement. Nonendoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement is used in companion animals to establish permanent or temporary enteral access. We successfully have adapted this procedure in swine as a method for short-term enteral access. This technique has several advantages over the traditional surgical method for gastrostomy tube placement. It is minimally invasive, results in less animal pain and distress, requires less procedural and recovery time, and is inexpensive. Disadvantages include the potential for splenic entrapment, splenic penetration, perforation of the esophagus, and other complications related to misplacement of the tube or applicator. This paper describes the equipment, technique, and potential complications for placing a nonendoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy tube in swine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035287654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035287654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11300687

AN - SCOPUS:0035287654

VL - 40

SP - 37

EP - 39

JO - Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science

JF - Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science

SN - 1559-6109

IS - 2

ER -