Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (inhance)

Comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA

James Glockner, Naoki Takahashi, Akira Kawashima, David A Woodrum, David W. Stanley, Naoyuki Takei, Mitsuharu Miyoshi, Wei Sun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the performance of a three-dimensional (3D) non-contrast respiratory-triggered steady state free precession (SSFP) pulse sequence for detection of renal artery stenosis. Materials and Methods: A total of 64 patients who had non-contrast MR angiography (NC MRA) and 3D contrast-enhanced MRA (CE MRA) performed during the same exam and three patients who had NC MRA followed by conventional catheter angiography within one month of the MRI exam were included in this retrospective study. Two blinded readers evaluated NC MRA images for the presence of significant renal artery stenosis and also rated their diagnostic confidence and evaluated the images for artifact. A similar analysis was performed for CE MRA images by two additional blinded readers, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus reading. Results: The 67 patients had 168 main and accessory renal arteries, with significant (>50%) stenosis in 34 arteries on CE MRA or conventional angiography. The two NC MRA readers had sensitivity and specificity for detection of significant stenosis of 94%/82% and 82%/87% respectively on a per renal artery basis. Conclusion: There was good agreement between CE MRA and NC MRA for detection of significant renal artery stenosis. This technique should prove useful in evaluating patients with suspected renovascular hypertension who are unable to undergo CE MRA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1411-1418
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Renal Artery
Angiography
Renal Artery Obstruction
Pathologic Constriction
Renovascular Hypertension
Artifacts
Reading
Catheters
Retrospective Studies
Arteries
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Non-contrast MRA
  • Renal artery stenosis
  • Renal MRA
  • Renal MRI
  • Steady state free precession

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (inhance) : Comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA. / Glockner, James; Takahashi, Naoki; Kawashima, Akira; Woodrum, David A; Stanley, David W.; Takei, Naoyuki; Miyoshi, Mitsuharu; Sun, Wei.

In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2010, p. 1411-1418.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{663af9af788c4871897830741350a3f1,
title = "Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (inhance): Comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the performance of a three-dimensional (3D) non-contrast respiratory-triggered steady state free precession (SSFP) pulse sequence for detection of renal artery stenosis. Materials and Methods: A total of 64 patients who had non-contrast MR angiography (NC MRA) and 3D contrast-enhanced MRA (CE MRA) performed during the same exam and three patients who had NC MRA followed by conventional catheter angiography within one month of the MRI exam were included in this retrospective study. Two blinded readers evaluated NC MRA images for the presence of significant renal artery stenosis and also rated their diagnostic confidence and evaluated the images for artifact. A similar analysis was performed for CE MRA images by two additional blinded readers, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus reading. Results: The 67 patients had 168 main and accessory renal arteries, with significant (>50{\%}) stenosis in 34 arteries on CE MRA or conventional angiography. The two NC MRA readers had sensitivity and specificity for detection of significant stenosis of 94{\%}/82{\%} and 82{\%}/87{\%} respectively on a per renal artery basis. Conclusion: There was good agreement between CE MRA and NC MRA for detection of significant renal artery stenosis. This technique should prove useful in evaluating patients with suspected renovascular hypertension who are unable to undergo CE MRA.",
keywords = "Non-contrast MRA, Renal artery stenosis, Renal MRA, Renal MRI, Steady state free precession",
author = "James Glockner and Naoki Takahashi and Akira Kawashima and Woodrum, {David A} and Stanley, {David W.} and Naoyuki Takei and Mitsuharu Miyoshi and Wei Sun",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1002/jmri.22194",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "1411--1418",
journal = "Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging",
issn = "1053-1807",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (inhance)

T2 - Comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA

AU - Glockner, James

AU - Takahashi, Naoki

AU - Kawashima, Akira

AU - Woodrum, David A

AU - Stanley, David W.

AU - Takei, Naoyuki

AU - Miyoshi, Mitsuharu

AU - Sun, Wei

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Purpose: To assess the performance of a three-dimensional (3D) non-contrast respiratory-triggered steady state free precession (SSFP) pulse sequence for detection of renal artery stenosis. Materials and Methods: A total of 64 patients who had non-contrast MR angiography (NC MRA) and 3D contrast-enhanced MRA (CE MRA) performed during the same exam and three patients who had NC MRA followed by conventional catheter angiography within one month of the MRI exam were included in this retrospective study. Two blinded readers evaluated NC MRA images for the presence of significant renal artery stenosis and also rated their diagnostic confidence and evaluated the images for artifact. A similar analysis was performed for CE MRA images by two additional blinded readers, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus reading. Results: The 67 patients had 168 main and accessory renal arteries, with significant (>50%) stenosis in 34 arteries on CE MRA or conventional angiography. The two NC MRA readers had sensitivity and specificity for detection of significant stenosis of 94%/82% and 82%/87% respectively on a per renal artery basis. Conclusion: There was good agreement between CE MRA and NC MRA for detection of significant renal artery stenosis. This technique should prove useful in evaluating patients with suspected renovascular hypertension who are unable to undergo CE MRA.

AB - Purpose: To assess the performance of a three-dimensional (3D) non-contrast respiratory-triggered steady state free precession (SSFP) pulse sequence for detection of renal artery stenosis. Materials and Methods: A total of 64 patients who had non-contrast MR angiography (NC MRA) and 3D contrast-enhanced MRA (CE MRA) performed during the same exam and three patients who had NC MRA followed by conventional catheter angiography within one month of the MRI exam were included in this retrospective study. Two blinded readers evaluated NC MRA images for the presence of significant renal artery stenosis and also rated their diagnostic confidence and evaluated the images for artifact. A similar analysis was performed for CE MRA images by two additional blinded readers, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus reading. Results: The 67 patients had 168 main and accessory renal arteries, with significant (>50%) stenosis in 34 arteries on CE MRA or conventional angiography. The two NC MRA readers had sensitivity and specificity for detection of significant stenosis of 94%/82% and 82%/87% respectively on a per renal artery basis. Conclusion: There was good agreement between CE MRA and NC MRA for detection of significant renal artery stenosis. This technique should prove useful in evaluating patients with suspected renovascular hypertension who are unable to undergo CE MRA.

KW - Non-contrast MRA

KW - Renal artery stenosis

KW - Renal MRA

KW - Renal MRI

KW - Steady state free precession

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952864346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952864346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jmri.22194

DO - 10.1002/jmri.22194

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 1411

EP - 1418

JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

SN - 1053-1807

IS - 6

ER -