Newly diagnosed bulbar urethral strictures: Etiology and outcome of various treatments

T. J. Stormont, Vera Jean Suman, J. E. Oesterling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A retrospective review was performed of 199 consecutive patients who were evaluated at this institution between 1976 and 1990 because of a newly diagnosed bulbar urethral stricture. Mean patient age at diagnosis was 64 years (range 10 to 96) and most patients presented with obstructive symptoms. The stricture etiology was primarily iatrogenic (47%), secondary to a transurethral procedure. The strictures were usually short (less than 2 cm., 96%), single (99%) and located in the proximal bulb (57%). Of the 151 patients receiving treatment at the time of initial diagnosis 101 (67%) underwent urethral dilation, 39 (26%) were managed with direct vision internal urethrotomy and in 11 (7%) a cystotomy tube was placed. With a median followup of 3.5 years (range 0 to 16), there was an estimated retreatment rate of 2.4 treatments per 10 person-years. The probability of not requiring retreatment within 3 years was 65 ± 5% for urethral dilation and 68 ± 8% for direct vision internal urethrotomy. When compared to urethral dilation, direct vision internal urethrotomy resulted in a higher incidence of postprocedure cystitis (5% versus 3%), epididymitis (5% versus 3%) and penile hemorrhage (8% versus 2%). These findings indicate that both conservative therapies were equally efficacious as an initial treatment of bulbar urethral stricture. However, direct vision internal urethrotomy did have a slightly higher complication rate. No specific patient or stricture characteristics could be identified that were reliable for predicting therapeutic outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1725-1728
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume150
Issue number5 II
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Urethral Stricture
Dilatation
Pathologic Constriction
Retreatment
Cystotomy
Epididymitis
Cystitis
Therapeutics
Hemorrhage
Incidence

Keywords

  • urethra
  • urethral stricture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Newly diagnosed bulbar urethral strictures : Etiology and outcome of various treatments. / Stormont, T. J.; Suman, Vera Jean; Oesterling, J. E.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 150, No. 5 II, 1993, p. 1725-1728.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stormont, T. J. ; Suman, Vera Jean ; Oesterling, J. E. / Newly diagnosed bulbar urethral strictures : Etiology and outcome of various treatments. In: Journal of Urology. 1993 ; Vol. 150, No. 5 II. pp. 1725-1728.
@article{5629480072ac4eeeb52f2994022730e2,
title = "Newly diagnosed bulbar urethral strictures: Etiology and outcome of various treatments",
abstract = "A retrospective review was performed of 199 consecutive patients who were evaluated at this institution between 1976 and 1990 because of a newly diagnosed bulbar urethral stricture. Mean patient age at diagnosis was 64 years (range 10 to 96) and most patients presented with obstructive symptoms. The stricture etiology was primarily iatrogenic (47{\%}), secondary to a transurethral procedure. The strictures were usually short (less than 2 cm., 96{\%}), single (99{\%}) and located in the proximal bulb (57{\%}). Of the 151 patients receiving treatment at the time of initial diagnosis 101 (67{\%}) underwent urethral dilation, 39 (26{\%}) were managed with direct vision internal urethrotomy and in 11 (7{\%}) a cystotomy tube was placed. With a median followup of 3.5 years (range 0 to 16), there was an estimated retreatment rate of 2.4 treatments per 10 person-years. The probability of not requiring retreatment within 3 years was 65 ± 5{\%} for urethral dilation and 68 ± 8{\%} for direct vision internal urethrotomy. When compared to urethral dilation, direct vision internal urethrotomy resulted in a higher incidence of postprocedure cystitis (5{\%} versus 3{\%}), epididymitis (5{\%} versus 3{\%}) and penile hemorrhage (8{\%} versus 2{\%}). These findings indicate that both conservative therapies were equally efficacious as an initial treatment of bulbar urethral stricture. However, direct vision internal urethrotomy did have a slightly higher complication rate. No specific patient or stricture characteristics could be identified that were reliable for predicting therapeutic outcome.",
keywords = "urethra, urethral stricture",
author = "Stormont, {T. J.} and Suman, {Vera Jean} and Oesterling, {J. E.}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "150",
pages = "1725--1728",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5 II",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Newly diagnosed bulbar urethral strictures

T2 - Etiology and outcome of various treatments

AU - Stormont, T. J.

AU - Suman, Vera Jean

AU - Oesterling, J. E.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - A retrospective review was performed of 199 consecutive patients who were evaluated at this institution between 1976 and 1990 because of a newly diagnosed bulbar urethral stricture. Mean patient age at diagnosis was 64 years (range 10 to 96) and most patients presented with obstructive symptoms. The stricture etiology was primarily iatrogenic (47%), secondary to a transurethral procedure. The strictures were usually short (less than 2 cm., 96%), single (99%) and located in the proximal bulb (57%). Of the 151 patients receiving treatment at the time of initial diagnosis 101 (67%) underwent urethral dilation, 39 (26%) were managed with direct vision internal urethrotomy and in 11 (7%) a cystotomy tube was placed. With a median followup of 3.5 years (range 0 to 16), there was an estimated retreatment rate of 2.4 treatments per 10 person-years. The probability of not requiring retreatment within 3 years was 65 ± 5% for urethral dilation and 68 ± 8% for direct vision internal urethrotomy. When compared to urethral dilation, direct vision internal urethrotomy resulted in a higher incidence of postprocedure cystitis (5% versus 3%), epididymitis (5% versus 3%) and penile hemorrhage (8% versus 2%). These findings indicate that both conservative therapies were equally efficacious as an initial treatment of bulbar urethral stricture. However, direct vision internal urethrotomy did have a slightly higher complication rate. No specific patient or stricture characteristics could be identified that were reliable for predicting therapeutic outcome.

AB - A retrospective review was performed of 199 consecutive patients who were evaluated at this institution between 1976 and 1990 because of a newly diagnosed bulbar urethral stricture. Mean patient age at diagnosis was 64 years (range 10 to 96) and most patients presented with obstructive symptoms. The stricture etiology was primarily iatrogenic (47%), secondary to a transurethral procedure. The strictures were usually short (less than 2 cm., 96%), single (99%) and located in the proximal bulb (57%). Of the 151 patients receiving treatment at the time of initial diagnosis 101 (67%) underwent urethral dilation, 39 (26%) were managed with direct vision internal urethrotomy and in 11 (7%) a cystotomy tube was placed. With a median followup of 3.5 years (range 0 to 16), there was an estimated retreatment rate of 2.4 treatments per 10 person-years. The probability of not requiring retreatment within 3 years was 65 ± 5% for urethral dilation and 68 ± 8% for direct vision internal urethrotomy. When compared to urethral dilation, direct vision internal urethrotomy resulted in a higher incidence of postprocedure cystitis (5% versus 3%), epididymitis (5% versus 3%) and penile hemorrhage (8% versus 2%). These findings indicate that both conservative therapies were equally efficacious as an initial treatment of bulbar urethral stricture. However, direct vision internal urethrotomy did have a slightly higher complication rate. No specific patient or stricture characteristics could be identified that were reliable for predicting therapeutic outcome.

KW - urethra

KW - urethral stricture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027737058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027737058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8411459

AN - SCOPUS:0027737058

VL - 150

SP - 1725

EP - 1728

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 5 II

ER -