Neurologist Versus Machine: Is the Pupillometer Better than the Naked Eye in Detecting Pupillary Reactivity

Christopher L. Kramer, Alejandro Rabinstein, Eelco F M Wijdicks, Sara E. Hocker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: A 62-year-old man with severe traumatic brain injury developed postsurgical anisocoria in which there was a discrepancy between pupillometer and manual testing.

Methods: Case report.

Results: The patient’s larger pupil was read as unreactive by the pupillometer but constricted 1 mm over 7–9 s of continuous light stimulation.

Conclusions: While pupillometry assessment is a valuable adjunct to the manual pupillary assessment, this case demonstrates that nonreactive pupils read on the pupillometer should be confirmed with the manual examination because it can miss very slowly reacting pupils.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-311
Number of pages3
JournalNeurocritical Care
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Pupil
Anisocoria
Light
Neurologists

Keywords

  • Brain death
  • Neurocritical care
  • Neurological examination
  • Pupillary reactivity
  • Pupillometer
  • Uncal herniation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Neurologist Versus Machine : Is the Pupillometer Better than the Naked Eye in Detecting Pupillary Reactivity. / Kramer, Christopher L.; Rabinstein, Alejandro; Wijdicks, Eelco F M; Hocker, Sara E.

In: Neurocritical Care, Vol. 21, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 309-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kramer, Christopher L. ; Rabinstein, Alejandro ; Wijdicks, Eelco F M ; Hocker, Sara E. / Neurologist Versus Machine : Is the Pupillometer Better than the Naked Eye in Detecting Pupillary Reactivity. In: Neurocritical Care. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 309-311.
@article{7ff0eae4ead04a4cacbad65a70d38ed8,
title = "Neurologist Versus Machine: Is the Pupillometer Better than the Naked Eye in Detecting Pupillary Reactivity",
abstract = "Background: A 62-year-old man with severe traumatic brain injury developed postsurgical anisocoria in which there was a discrepancy between pupillometer and manual testing.Methods: Case report.Results: The patient’s larger pupil was read as unreactive by the pupillometer but constricted 1 mm over 7–9 s of continuous light stimulation.Conclusions: While pupillometry assessment is a valuable adjunct to the manual pupillary assessment, this case demonstrates that nonreactive pupils read on the pupillometer should be confirmed with the manual examination because it can miss very slowly reacting pupils.",
keywords = "Brain death, Neurocritical care, Neurological examination, Pupillary reactivity, Pupillometer, Uncal herniation",
author = "Kramer, {Christopher L.} and Alejandro Rabinstein and Wijdicks, {Eelco F M} and Hocker, {Sara E.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12028-014-9988-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "309--311",
journal = "Neurocritical Care",
issn = "1541-6933",
publisher = "Humana Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neurologist Versus Machine

T2 - Is the Pupillometer Better than the Naked Eye in Detecting Pupillary Reactivity

AU - Kramer, Christopher L.

AU - Rabinstein, Alejandro

AU - Wijdicks, Eelco F M

AU - Hocker, Sara E.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Background: A 62-year-old man with severe traumatic brain injury developed postsurgical anisocoria in which there was a discrepancy between pupillometer and manual testing.Methods: Case report.Results: The patient’s larger pupil was read as unreactive by the pupillometer but constricted 1 mm over 7–9 s of continuous light stimulation.Conclusions: While pupillometry assessment is a valuable adjunct to the manual pupillary assessment, this case demonstrates that nonreactive pupils read on the pupillometer should be confirmed with the manual examination because it can miss very slowly reacting pupils.

AB - Background: A 62-year-old man with severe traumatic brain injury developed postsurgical anisocoria in which there was a discrepancy between pupillometer and manual testing.Methods: Case report.Results: The patient’s larger pupil was read as unreactive by the pupillometer but constricted 1 mm over 7–9 s of continuous light stimulation.Conclusions: While pupillometry assessment is a valuable adjunct to the manual pupillary assessment, this case demonstrates that nonreactive pupils read on the pupillometer should be confirmed with the manual examination because it can miss very slowly reacting pupils.

KW - Brain death

KW - Neurocritical care

KW - Neurological examination

KW - Pupillary reactivity

KW - Pupillometer

KW - Uncal herniation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911004191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911004191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12028-014-9988-5

DO - 10.1007/s12028-014-9988-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 24865269

AN - SCOPUS:84911004191

VL - 21

SP - 309

EP - 311

JO - Neurocritical Care

JF - Neurocritical Care

SN - 1541-6933

IS - 2

ER -