Neurogenic orofacial weakness and speech in adults with dysarthria

Nancy Pearl Solomon, Matthew J. Makashay, Leah B. Helou, Heather Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared orofacial strength between adults with dysarthria and neurologically normal (NN) matched controls. In addition, orofacial muscle weakness was examined for potential relationships to speech impairments in adults with dysarthria. Method: Matched groups of 55 adults with dysarthria and 55 NN adults generated maximum pressure (Pmax) against an air-filled bulb during lingual elevation, protrusion and lateralization, and buccodental and labial compressions. These orofacial strength measures were compared with speech intelligibility, perceptual ratings of speech, articulation rate, and fast syllable-repetition rate. Results: The dysarthria group demonstrated significantly lower orofacial strength than the NN group on all tasks. Lingual strength correlated moderately and buccal strength correlated weakly with most ratings of speech deficits. Speech intelligibility was not sensitive to dysarthria severity. Individuals with severely reduced anterior lingual elevation Pmax (< 18 kPa) had normal to profoundly impaired sentence intelligibility (99%–6%) and moderately to severely impaired speech (26%–94% articulatory imprecision; 33%–94% overall severity). Conclusions: Results support the presence of orofacial muscle weakness in adults with dysarthrias of varying etiologies but reinforce tenuous links between orofacial strength and speech production disorders. By examining individual data, preliminary evidence emerges to suggest that speech, but not necessarily intelligibility, is likely to be impaired when lingual weakness is severe.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)951-960
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Dysarthria
Tongue
Speech Intelligibility
Muscle Weakness
Speech Disorders
Cheek
rating
Lip
Group
Research Design
etiology
Air
Pressure
deficit
air

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Neurogenic orofacial weakness and speech in adults with dysarthria. / Solomon, Nancy Pearl; Makashay, Matthew J.; Helou, Leah B.; Clark, Heather.

In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 951-960.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Solomon, Nancy Pearl ; Makashay, Matthew J. ; Helou, Leah B. ; Clark, Heather. / Neurogenic orofacial weakness and speech in adults with dysarthria. In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2017 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 951-960.
@article{355924d4fa774a10bd8d6b7a6f3de831,
title = "Neurogenic orofacial weakness and speech in adults with dysarthria",
abstract = "Purpose: This study compared orofacial strength between adults with dysarthria and neurologically normal (NN) matched controls. In addition, orofacial muscle weakness was examined for potential relationships to speech impairments in adults with dysarthria. Method: Matched groups of 55 adults with dysarthria and 55 NN adults generated maximum pressure (Pmax) against an air-filled bulb during lingual elevation, protrusion and lateralization, and buccodental and labial compressions. These orofacial strength measures were compared with speech intelligibility, perceptual ratings of speech, articulation rate, and fast syllable-repetition rate. Results: The dysarthria group demonstrated significantly lower orofacial strength than the NN group on all tasks. Lingual strength correlated moderately and buccal strength correlated weakly with most ratings of speech deficits. Speech intelligibility was not sensitive to dysarthria severity. Individuals with severely reduced anterior lingual elevation Pmax (< 18 kPa) had normal to profoundly impaired sentence intelligibility (99{\%}–6{\%}) and moderately to severely impaired speech (26{\%}–94{\%} articulatory imprecision; 33{\%}–94{\%} overall severity). Conclusions: Results support the presence of orofacial muscle weakness in adults with dysarthrias of varying etiologies but reinforce tenuous links between orofacial strength and speech production disorders. By examining individual data, preliminary evidence emerges to suggest that speech, but not necessarily intelligibility, is likely to be impaired when lingual weakness is severe.",
author = "Solomon, {Nancy Pearl} and Makashay, {Matthew J.} and Helou, {Leah B.} and Heather Clark",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0144",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "951--960",
journal = "American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology",
issn = "1058-0360",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neurogenic orofacial weakness and speech in adults with dysarthria

AU - Solomon, Nancy Pearl

AU - Makashay, Matthew J.

AU - Helou, Leah B.

AU - Clark, Heather

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Purpose: This study compared orofacial strength between adults with dysarthria and neurologically normal (NN) matched controls. In addition, orofacial muscle weakness was examined for potential relationships to speech impairments in adults with dysarthria. Method: Matched groups of 55 adults with dysarthria and 55 NN adults generated maximum pressure (Pmax) against an air-filled bulb during lingual elevation, protrusion and lateralization, and buccodental and labial compressions. These orofacial strength measures were compared with speech intelligibility, perceptual ratings of speech, articulation rate, and fast syllable-repetition rate. Results: The dysarthria group demonstrated significantly lower orofacial strength than the NN group on all tasks. Lingual strength correlated moderately and buccal strength correlated weakly with most ratings of speech deficits. Speech intelligibility was not sensitive to dysarthria severity. Individuals with severely reduced anterior lingual elevation Pmax (< 18 kPa) had normal to profoundly impaired sentence intelligibility (99%–6%) and moderately to severely impaired speech (26%–94% articulatory imprecision; 33%–94% overall severity). Conclusions: Results support the presence of orofacial muscle weakness in adults with dysarthrias of varying etiologies but reinforce tenuous links between orofacial strength and speech production disorders. By examining individual data, preliminary evidence emerges to suggest that speech, but not necessarily intelligibility, is likely to be impaired when lingual weakness is severe.

AB - Purpose: This study compared orofacial strength between adults with dysarthria and neurologically normal (NN) matched controls. In addition, orofacial muscle weakness was examined for potential relationships to speech impairments in adults with dysarthria. Method: Matched groups of 55 adults with dysarthria and 55 NN adults generated maximum pressure (Pmax) against an air-filled bulb during lingual elevation, protrusion and lateralization, and buccodental and labial compressions. These orofacial strength measures were compared with speech intelligibility, perceptual ratings of speech, articulation rate, and fast syllable-repetition rate. Results: The dysarthria group demonstrated significantly lower orofacial strength than the NN group on all tasks. Lingual strength correlated moderately and buccal strength correlated weakly with most ratings of speech deficits. Speech intelligibility was not sensitive to dysarthria severity. Individuals with severely reduced anterior lingual elevation Pmax (< 18 kPa) had normal to profoundly impaired sentence intelligibility (99%–6%) and moderately to severely impaired speech (26%–94% articulatory imprecision; 33%–94% overall severity). Conclusions: Results support the presence of orofacial muscle weakness in adults with dysarthrias of varying etiologies but reinforce tenuous links between orofacial strength and speech production disorders. By examining individual data, preliminary evidence emerges to suggest that speech, but not necessarily intelligibility, is likely to be impaired when lingual weakness is severe.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027549514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027549514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0144

DO - 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0144

M3 - Article

C2 - 28763804

AN - SCOPUS:85027549514

VL - 26

SP - 951

EP - 960

JO - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

JF - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

SN - 1058-0360

IS - 3

ER -