Neck neoplasms: MR imaging. Part I. Initial evaluation

H. S. Glazer, J. H. Niemeyer, D. M. Balfe, V. R. Devineni, B. Emami, Richard E Hayden, D. J. Aronberg, R. G. Levitt, M. P. Ward, S. S. Sagel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Untreated neoplasms of the neck (tumors of the oropharynx, supraglottic area, carotid body, and thyroid, in addition to malignant lymphadenopathy) were evaluated in 23 patients with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The results were compared with computed tomographic (CT) scans in 20 patients. Contrast between tumor and fat was best on relatively T1-weighted images (500/30-35 [TR msec/TE msec]), whereas separation of tumor and muscle was best with relatively T2-weighted pulse sequences (1,500/90). Balanced images (1,500/30-35) provided best overall image quality and best demonstrated vascular anatomy. MR imaging was usually superior to CT in showing the relationship of tumor mass to muscle. MR imaging and contrast material-enhanced CT were equivalent in most patients in defining vascular anatomy, but MR imaging was superior when intravenous contrast material was not administered. However, CT was more helpful in showing bone and cartilage anatomy, and in some patients CT also was better in showing airway abnormalities. Despite these limitations, MR imaging is a promising imaging technique for studying neoplasms of the neck.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-348
Number of pages6
JournalRadiology
Volume160
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Head and Neck Neoplasms
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Anatomy
Contrast Media
Blood Vessels
Neoplasms
Carotid Body
Muscles
Oropharynx
Cartilage
Thyroid Gland
Fats
Bone and Bones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Glazer, H. S., Niemeyer, J. H., Balfe, D. M., Devineni, V. R., Emami, B., Hayden, R. E., ... Sagel, S. S. (1986). Neck neoplasms: MR imaging. Part I. Initial evaluation. Radiology, 160(2), 343-348.

Neck neoplasms : MR imaging. Part I. Initial evaluation. / Glazer, H. S.; Niemeyer, J. H.; Balfe, D. M.; Devineni, V. R.; Emami, B.; Hayden, Richard E; Aronberg, D. J.; Levitt, R. G.; Ward, M. P.; Sagel, S. S.

In: Radiology, Vol. 160, No. 2, 1986, p. 343-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Glazer, HS, Niemeyer, JH, Balfe, DM, Devineni, VR, Emami, B, Hayden, RE, Aronberg, DJ, Levitt, RG, Ward, MP & Sagel, SS 1986, 'Neck neoplasms: MR imaging. Part I. Initial evaluation', Radiology, vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 343-348.
Glazer HS, Niemeyer JH, Balfe DM, Devineni VR, Emami B, Hayden RE et al. Neck neoplasms: MR imaging. Part I. Initial evaluation. Radiology. 1986;160(2):343-348.
Glazer, H. S. ; Niemeyer, J. H. ; Balfe, D. M. ; Devineni, V. R. ; Emami, B. ; Hayden, Richard E ; Aronberg, D. J. ; Levitt, R. G. ; Ward, M. P. ; Sagel, S. S. / Neck neoplasms : MR imaging. Part I. Initial evaluation. In: Radiology. 1986 ; Vol. 160, No. 2. pp. 343-348.
@article{23a5f1c53936430bb8a5f8969e833c6f,
title = "Neck neoplasms: MR imaging. Part I. Initial evaluation",
abstract = "Untreated neoplasms of the neck (tumors of the oropharynx, supraglottic area, carotid body, and thyroid, in addition to malignant lymphadenopathy) were evaluated in 23 patients with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The results were compared with computed tomographic (CT) scans in 20 patients. Contrast between tumor and fat was best on relatively T1-weighted images (500/30-35 [TR msec/TE msec]), whereas separation of tumor and muscle was best with relatively T2-weighted pulse sequences (1,500/90). Balanced images (1,500/30-35) provided best overall image quality and best demonstrated vascular anatomy. MR imaging was usually superior to CT in showing the relationship of tumor mass to muscle. MR imaging and contrast material-enhanced CT were equivalent in most patients in defining vascular anatomy, but MR imaging was superior when intravenous contrast material was not administered. However, CT was more helpful in showing bone and cartilage anatomy, and in some patients CT also was better in showing airway abnormalities. Despite these limitations, MR imaging is a promising imaging technique for studying neoplasms of the neck.",
author = "Glazer, {H. S.} and Niemeyer, {J. H.} and Balfe, {D. M.} and Devineni, {V. R.} and B. Emami and Hayden, {Richard E} and Aronberg, {D. J.} and Levitt, {R. G.} and Ward, {M. P.} and Sagel, {S. S.}",
year = "1986",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "160",
pages = "343--348",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neck neoplasms

T2 - MR imaging. Part I. Initial evaluation

AU - Glazer, H. S.

AU - Niemeyer, J. H.

AU - Balfe, D. M.

AU - Devineni, V. R.

AU - Emami, B.

AU - Hayden, Richard E

AU - Aronberg, D. J.

AU - Levitt, R. G.

AU - Ward, M. P.

AU - Sagel, S. S.

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - Untreated neoplasms of the neck (tumors of the oropharynx, supraglottic area, carotid body, and thyroid, in addition to malignant lymphadenopathy) were evaluated in 23 patients with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The results were compared with computed tomographic (CT) scans in 20 patients. Contrast between tumor and fat was best on relatively T1-weighted images (500/30-35 [TR msec/TE msec]), whereas separation of tumor and muscle was best with relatively T2-weighted pulse sequences (1,500/90). Balanced images (1,500/30-35) provided best overall image quality and best demonstrated vascular anatomy. MR imaging was usually superior to CT in showing the relationship of tumor mass to muscle. MR imaging and contrast material-enhanced CT were equivalent in most patients in defining vascular anatomy, but MR imaging was superior when intravenous contrast material was not administered. However, CT was more helpful in showing bone and cartilage anatomy, and in some patients CT also was better in showing airway abnormalities. Despite these limitations, MR imaging is a promising imaging technique for studying neoplasms of the neck.

AB - Untreated neoplasms of the neck (tumors of the oropharynx, supraglottic area, carotid body, and thyroid, in addition to malignant lymphadenopathy) were evaluated in 23 patients with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The results were compared with computed tomographic (CT) scans in 20 patients. Contrast between tumor and fat was best on relatively T1-weighted images (500/30-35 [TR msec/TE msec]), whereas separation of tumor and muscle was best with relatively T2-weighted pulse sequences (1,500/90). Balanced images (1,500/30-35) provided best overall image quality and best demonstrated vascular anatomy. MR imaging was usually superior to CT in showing the relationship of tumor mass to muscle. MR imaging and contrast material-enhanced CT were equivalent in most patients in defining vascular anatomy, but MR imaging was superior when intravenous contrast material was not administered. However, CT was more helpful in showing bone and cartilage anatomy, and in some patients CT also was better in showing airway abnormalities. Despite these limitations, MR imaging is a promising imaging technique for studying neoplasms of the neck.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022469398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022469398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3726111

AN - SCOPUS:0022469398

VL - 160

SP - 343

EP - 348

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -