Navigating a research partnership between academia and industry to assess the impact of personalized genetic testing

Lisa Soleymani Lehmann, David J. Kaufman, Richard R Sharp, Tanya A. Moreno, Joanna L. Mountain, J. Scott Roberts, Robert C. Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the process of structuring a partnership between academic researchers and two personalized genetic testing companies that would manage conflicts of interest while allowing researchers to study the impact of this nascent industry. Methods: We developed a transparent process of ongoing communication about the interests of all research partners to address challenges in establishing study goals, survey development, data collection, analysis, and manuscript preparation. Using the existing literature on conflicts of interest and our experience, we created a checklist for academic and industry researchers seeking to structure research partnerships. Results: Our checklist includes questions about the risk to research participants, sponsorship of the study, control of data analysis, freedom to publish results, the impact of the research on industry customers, openness to input from all partners, sharing results before publication, and publication of industry-specific data. Transparency is critical to building trust between partners. Involving all partners in the research development enhanced the quality of our research and provided an opportunity to manage conflicts early in the research process. Conclusion: Navigating relationships between academia and industry is complex and requires strategies that are transparent and responsive to the concerns of all. Employing a checklist of questions prior to beginning a research partnership may help to manage conflicts of interest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)268-273
Number of pages6
JournalGenetics in Medicine
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Genetic Testing
Industry
Research
Conflict of Interest
Checklist
Research Personnel
Publications
Manuscripts
Communication

Keywords

  • conflicts of interest
  • direct-to-consumer
  • partnership
  • personalized genetic testing
  • personalized medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Navigating a research partnership between academia and industry to assess the impact of personalized genetic testing. / Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani; Kaufman, David J.; Sharp, Richard R; Moreno, Tanya A.; Mountain, Joanna L.; Roberts, J. Scott; Green, Robert C.

In: Genetics in Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 2, 02.2012, p. 268-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani ; Kaufman, David J. ; Sharp, Richard R ; Moreno, Tanya A. ; Mountain, Joanna L. ; Roberts, J. Scott ; Green, Robert C. / Navigating a research partnership between academia and industry to assess the impact of personalized genetic testing. In: Genetics in Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 268-273.
@article{28ea08b1aad04a79b58a4b20dc453476,
title = "Navigating a research partnership between academia and industry to assess the impact of personalized genetic testing",
abstract = "Purpose: To describe the process of structuring a partnership between academic researchers and two personalized genetic testing companies that would manage conflicts of interest while allowing researchers to study the impact of this nascent industry. Methods: We developed a transparent process of ongoing communication about the interests of all research partners to address challenges in establishing study goals, survey development, data collection, analysis, and manuscript preparation. Using the existing literature on conflicts of interest and our experience, we created a checklist for academic and industry researchers seeking to structure research partnerships. Results: Our checklist includes questions about the risk to research participants, sponsorship of the study, control of data analysis, freedom to publish results, the impact of the research on industry customers, openness to input from all partners, sharing results before publication, and publication of industry-specific data. Transparency is critical to building trust between partners. Involving all partners in the research development enhanced the quality of our research and provided an opportunity to manage conflicts early in the research process. Conclusion: Navigating relationships between academia and industry is complex and requires strategies that are transparent and responsive to the concerns of all. Employing a checklist of questions prior to beginning a research partnership may help to manage conflicts of interest.",
keywords = "conflicts of interest, direct-to-consumer, partnership, personalized genetic testing, personalized medicine",
author = "Lehmann, {Lisa Soleymani} and Kaufman, {David J.} and Sharp, {Richard R} and Moreno, {Tanya A.} and Mountain, {Joanna L.} and Roberts, {J. Scott} and Green, {Robert C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1038/gim.2011.59",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "268--273",
journal = "Genetics in Medicine",
issn = "1098-3600",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Navigating a research partnership between academia and industry to assess the impact of personalized genetic testing

AU - Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani

AU - Kaufman, David J.

AU - Sharp, Richard R

AU - Moreno, Tanya A.

AU - Mountain, Joanna L.

AU - Roberts, J. Scott

AU - Green, Robert C.

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Purpose: To describe the process of structuring a partnership between academic researchers and two personalized genetic testing companies that would manage conflicts of interest while allowing researchers to study the impact of this nascent industry. Methods: We developed a transparent process of ongoing communication about the interests of all research partners to address challenges in establishing study goals, survey development, data collection, analysis, and manuscript preparation. Using the existing literature on conflicts of interest and our experience, we created a checklist for academic and industry researchers seeking to structure research partnerships. Results: Our checklist includes questions about the risk to research participants, sponsorship of the study, control of data analysis, freedom to publish results, the impact of the research on industry customers, openness to input from all partners, sharing results before publication, and publication of industry-specific data. Transparency is critical to building trust between partners. Involving all partners in the research development enhanced the quality of our research and provided an opportunity to manage conflicts early in the research process. Conclusion: Navigating relationships between academia and industry is complex and requires strategies that are transparent and responsive to the concerns of all. Employing a checklist of questions prior to beginning a research partnership may help to manage conflicts of interest.

AB - Purpose: To describe the process of structuring a partnership between academic researchers and two personalized genetic testing companies that would manage conflicts of interest while allowing researchers to study the impact of this nascent industry. Methods: We developed a transparent process of ongoing communication about the interests of all research partners to address challenges in establishing study goals, survey development, data collection, analysis, and manuscript preparation. Using the existing literature on conflicts of interest and our experience, we created a checklist for academic and industry researchers seeking to structure research partnerships. Results: Our checklist includes questions about the risk to research participants, sponsorship of the study, control of data analysis, freedom to publish results, the impact of the research on industry customers, openness to input from all partners, sharing results before publication, and publication of industry-specific data. Transparency is critical to building trust between partners. Involving all partners in the research development enhanced the quality of our research and provided an opportunity to manage conflicts early in the research process. Conclusion: Navigating relationships between academia and industry is complex and requires strategies that are transparent and responsive to the concerns of all. Employing a checklist of questions prior to beginning a research partnership may help to manage conflicts of interest.

KW - conflicts of interest

KW - direct-to-consumer

KW - partnership

KW - personalized genetic testing

KW - personalized medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856707405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856707405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/gim.2011.59

DO - 10.1038/gim.2011.59

M3 - Article

C2 - 22241103

AN - SCOPUS:84856707405

VL - 14

SP - 268

EP - 273

JO - Genetics in Medicine

JF - Genetics in Medicine

SN - 1098-3600

IS - 2

ER -