TY - JOUR
T1 - Nationally representative equations that include resistance and reactance for the prediction of percent body fat in Americans
AU - Stevens, J.
AU - Truesdale, K. P.
AU - Cai, J.
AU - Ou, F. S.
AU - Reynolds, K. R.
AU - Heymsfield, S. B.
N1 - Funding Information:
Author affiliation: Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill North Carolina (June Stevens, Kimberly P Truesdale), Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel. Hill North Carolina (June Stevens), Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public. Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill North Carolina (Jianwen Cai), Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Fang-Shu Ou). Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana (Steven B Heymsfield). This work was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01-DK097046).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/11/1
Y1 - 2017/11/1
N2 - Background/Objectives:Resistance and reactance collected by bioelectrical impedance (BIA) can be used in equations to estimate percent body fat at relatively low cost and subject burden. To our knowledge, no such equations have been developed in a nationally representative sample.Subjects/Methods:Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessed percent body fat from the 1999 to 2004 National Health and Nutrition Survey was the criterion method for development of sex-specific percent body fat equations using up to 6467 males or 4888 females 8-49 years of age. Candidate variables were studied in multiple mathematical forms and interactions using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator. Models were fit in 2/3's of the data and validated in 1/3 of the data selected at random. Final coefficients, R 2 values and root mean square error (RMSE) were estimated in the full data set.Results:Models that included age, ethnicity, height, weight, BMI and BIA assessments (resistance, reactance and height 2 /resistance) had R 2 values of 0.831 in men and 0.864 in women in the full data set. RMSE measurements were between 2 and 3 body fat percentage points, and all equations showed low bias across groups formed by age, race/ethnicity or body mass index category. The addition of triceps skinfold and waist circumference increased the R 2 to 0.905 in males and 0.883 in females. Adding other anthropometrics (plus menses in females) had little impact on performance. Reactance and resistance alone (in multiple mathematical forms) performed poorly with R 2 ∼0.2.Conclusions:Equations that included BIA assessments along with demographic and anthropometric variables provided percent body fat assessments that had high generalizability, strong predictive ability and low bias.
AB - Background/Objectives:Resistance and reactance collected by bioelectrical impedance (BIA) can be used in equations to estimate percent body fat at relatively low cost and subject burden. To our knowledge, no such equations have been developed in a nationally representative sample.Subjects/Methods:Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessed percent body fat from the 1999 to 2004 National Health and Nutrition Survey was the criterion method for development of sex-specific percent body fat equations using up to 6467 males or 4888 females 8-49 years of age. Candidate variables were studied in multiple mathematical forms and interactions using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator. Models were fit in 2/3's of the data and validated in 1/3 of the data selected at random. Final coefficients, R 2 values and root mean square error (RMSE) were estimated in the full data set.Results:Models that included age, ethnicity, height, weight, BMI and BIA assessments (resistance, reactance and height 2 /resistance) had R 2 values of 0.831 in men and 0.864 in women in the full data set. RMSE measurements were between 2 and 3 body fat percentage points, and all equations showed low bias across groups formed by age, race/ethnicity or body mass index category. The addition of triceps skinfold and waist circumference increased the R 2 to 0.905 in males and 0.883 in females. Adding other anthropometrics (plus menses in females) had little impact on performance. Reactance and resistance alone (in multiple mathematical forms) performed poorly with R 2 ∼0.2.Conclusions:Equations that included BIA assessments along with demographic and anthropometric variables provided percent body fat assessments that had high generalizability, strong predictive ability and low bias.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033212209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033212209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/ijo.2017.167
DO - 10.1038/ijo.2017.167
M3 - Article
C2 - 28736441
AN - SCOPUS:85033212209
VL - 41
SP - 1669
EP - 1675
JO - International Journal of Obesity
JF - International Journal of Obesity
SN - 0307-0565
IS - 11
ER -