TY - JOUR
T1 - National trends of 3- Versus 2-stage restorative proctocolectomy for chronic ulcerative colitis
AU - Bikhchandani, Jai
AU - Polites, Stephanie F.
AU - Wagie, Amy E.
AU - Habermann, Elizabeth B.
AU - Cima, Robert R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The ASCRS 2015.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing surgical treatment of chronic ulcerative colitis usually undergo a staged approach to IPA. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to identify the national trends in approach to IPA for chronic ulcerative colitis and to evaluate 30-day outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review study SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary care cancer center. PATIENTS: Patients with chronic ulcerative colitis who underwent IPA from 2005 to 2011 were identified. Those who underwent colectomy with pouch procedure were placed in a 2-stage cohort, and those without simultaneous colectomy were part of a 3-stage cohort. Emergent operations were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trends in procedure mix, preoperative characteristics, and postoperative 30-day outcomes were compared. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for postoperative infection. RESULTS: Of 2002 patients who underwent IPA, 1452 (72.5%) underwent 2-stage and 550 (27.5%) underwent 3-stage surgery. Since 2007, the distribution of 2- versus 3-stage procedures has not changed (p = 0.66). At the time of pouch surgery, patients who had undergone 3-stage surgery were less likely to have preoperative corticosteroid therapy, albumin <3 mg/dL, preoperative sepsis, and weight loss (all p < 0.05). Superficial surgical site infection was more common after 3-stage surgery (11.5% vs 7.3%; p < 0.01). After controlling for preoperative factors, wound classification was the only independent predictor of deep incisional or organ space infection (p < 0.01; OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.23-2.53). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: National trends of 2- versus 3-stage IPA have remained stable over the last 5 years. Patients who underwent a 3-stage approach were healthier at the time of pouch surgery, with decreased corticosteroid use, hypoalbuminemia, and weight loss. Mixed results were seen for infectious complications with either approach. Prospective research is needed to determine the best approach to IPA for chronic ulcerative colitis.
AB - BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing surgical treatment of chronic ulcerative colitis usually undergo a staged approach to IPA. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to identify the national trends in approach to IPA for chronic ulcerative colitis and to evaluate 30-day outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review study SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary care cancer center. PATIENTS: Patients with chronic ulcerative colitis who underwent IPA from 2005 to 2011 were identified. Those who underwent colectomy with pouch procedure were placed in a 2-stage cohort, and those without simultaneous colectomy were part of a 3-stage cohort. Emergent operations were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trends in procedure mix, preoperative characteristics, and postoperative 30-day outcomes were compared. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for postoperative infection. RESULTS: Of 2002 patients who underwent IPA, 1452 (72.5%) underwent 2-stage and 550 (27.5%) underwent 3-stage surgery. Since 2007, the distribution of 2- versus 3-stage procedures has not changed (p = 0.66). At the time of pouch surgery, patients who had undergone 3-stage surgery were less likely to have preoperative corticosteroid therapy, albumin <3 mg/dL, preoperative sepsis, and weight loss (all p < 0.05). Superficial surgical site infection was more common after 3-stage surgery (11.5% vs 7.3%; p < 0.01). After controlling for preoperative factors, wound classification was the only independent predictor of deep incisional or organ space infection (p < 0.01; OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.23-2.53). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: National trends of 2- versus 3-stage IPA have remained stable over the last 5 years. Patients who underwent a 3-stage approach were healthier at the time of pouch surgery, with decreased corticosteroid use, hypoalbuminemia, and weight loss. Mixed results were seen for infectious complications with either approach. Prospective research is needed to determine the best approach to IPA for chronic ulcerative colitis.
KW - Chronic ulcerative colitis
KW - Ileal pouch anal anastomosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925283951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925283951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000282
DO - 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000282
M3 - Article
C2 - 25585078
AN - SCOPUS:84925283951
SN - 0012-3706
VL - 58
SP - 199
EP - 204
JO - Diseases of the colon and rectum
JF - Diseases of the colon and rectum
IS - 2
ER -