National practice patterns in preoperative and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in breast procedures requiring drains

Survey of the American Society of Breast Surgeons

Rushin D. Brahmbhatt, Marianne Huebner, Jeffrey S. Scow, W. Scott Harmsen, Judy C Boughey, Ann M. Harris, Donna Goede, James W Jakub, Tina J Hieken, Amy C Degnim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. To assess national practice patterns regarding use of perioperative antibiotics by surgeons performing breast operations requiring drainage tubes. Methods. The members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) were surveyed regarding use of perioperative antibiotics for breast operations requiring drains, with or without immediate tissue expander or implant reconstruction. Results. Of 2,857 ASBrS members contacted, 917 (32 %) responded; all self-identified as surgeons. Of 905 evaluable respondents, most described themselves as general surgeons (46 %) or breast surgeons (46 %). For cases in which drains are anticipated, most respondents (86 %) reported routine use of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics, with 99 % selecting cephalosporins. Use of antibiotic >24 h postoperatively varied by whether or not reconstruction was performed. In nonreconstruction cases, the majority (76 %) reported ''never/almost never'' prescribing antibiotics beyond the 24-h postoperative period, but 16 % reported ''always/almost always.'' In reconstruction cases, the majority (58 %) reported routine antibiotic use beyond 24 h, and the primary driver of the decision to use antibiotics was reported to be the plastic surgeon (83 %). Among those reporting use at >24 h, the duration recommended for nonreconstruction cases was ''up to 1 week'' in 38 % and ''until drains removed'' in 39 %; this was similar for reconstruction cases. Conclusions. Cephalosporins are utilized uniformly as preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in breast operations requiring drains. However, use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis is strongly dependent on the presence of immediate breast reconstruction. Consensus is lacking on the role of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in breast operations utilizing drains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3205-3211
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume19
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Breast
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Cephalosporins
Tissue Expansion Devices
Mammaplasty
Surveys and Questionnaires
Postoperative Period
Surgeons
Drainage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

National practice patterns in preoperative and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in breast procedures requiring drains : Survey of the American Society of Breast Surgeons. / Brahmbhatt, Rushin D.; Huebner, Marianne; Scow, Jeffrey S.; Harmsen, W. Scott; Boughey, Judy C; Harris, Ann M.; Goede, Donna; Jakub, James W; Hieken, Tina J; Degnim, Amy C.

In: Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 19, No. 10, 10.2012, p. 3205-3211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d97393e94d724bba8a2aea95bf1934be,
title = "National practice patterns in preoperative and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in breast procedures requiring drains: Survey of the American Society of Breast Surgeons",
abstract = "Background. To assess national practice patterns regarding use of perioperative antibiotics by surgeons performing breast operations requiring drainage tubes. Methods. The members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) were surveyed regarding use of perioperative antibiotics for breast operations requiring drains, with or without immediate tissue expander or implant reconstruction. Results. Of 2,857 ASBrS members contacted, 917 (32 {\%}) responded; all self-identified as surgeons. Of 905 evaluable respondents, most described themselves as general surgeons (46 {\%}) or breast surgeons (46 {\%}). For cases in which drains are anticipated, most respondents (86 {\%}) reported routine use of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics, with 99 {\%} selecting cephalosporins. Use of antibiotic >24 h postoperatively varied by whether or not reconstruction was performed. In nonreconstruction cases, the majority (76 {\%}) reported ''never/almost never'' prescribing antibiotics beyond the 24-h postoperative period, but 16 {\%} reported ''always/almost always.'' In reconstruction cases, the majority (58 {\%}) reported routine antibiotic use beyond 24 h, and the primary driver of the decision to use antibiotics was reported to be the plastic surgeon (83 {\%}). Among those reporting use at >24 h, the duration recommended for nonreconstruction cases was ''up to 1 week'' in 38 {\%} and ''until drains removed'' in 39 {\%}; this was similar for reconstruction cases. Conclusions. Cephalosporins are utilized uniformly as preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in breast operations requiring drains. However, use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis is strongly dependent on the presence of immediate breast reconstruction. Consensus is lacking on the role of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in breast operations utilizing drains.",
author = "Brahmbhatt, {Rushin D.} and Marianne Huebner and Scow, {Jeffrey S.} and Harmsen, {W. Scott} and Boughey, {Judy C} and Harris, {Ann M.} and Donna Goede and Jakub, {James W} and Hieken, {Tina J} and Degnim, {Amy C}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1245/s10434-012-2477-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "3205--3211",
journal = "Annals of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "1068-9265",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - National practice patterns in preoperative and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in breast procedures requiring drains

T2 - Survey of the American Society of Breast Surgeons

AU - Brahmbhatt, Rushin D.

AU - Huebner, Marianne

AU - Scow, Jeffrey S.

AU - Harmsen, W. Scott

AU - Boughey, Judy C

AU - Harris, Ann M.

AU - Goede, Donna

AU - Jakub, James W

AU - Hieken, Tina J

AU - Degnim, Amy C

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Background. To assess national practice patterns regarding use of perioperative antibiotics by surgeons performing breast operations requiring drainage tubes. Methods. The members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) were surveyed regarding use of perioperative antibiotics for breast operations requiring drains, with or without immediate tissue expander or implant reconstruction. Results. Of 2,857 ASBrS members contacted, 917 (32 %) responded; all self-identified as surgeons. Of 905 evaluable respondents, most described themselves as general surgeons (46 %) or breast surgeons (46 %). For cases in which drains are anticipated, most respondents (86 %) reported routine use of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics, with 99 % selecting cephalosporins. Use of antibiotic >24 h postoperatively varied by whether or not reconstruction was performed. In nonreconstruction cases, the majority (76 %) reported ''never/almost never'' prescribing antibiotics beyond the 24-h postoperative period, but 16 % reported ''always/almost always.'' In reconstruction cases, the majority (58 %) reported routine antibiotic use beyond 24 h, and the primary driver of the decision to use antibiotics was reported to be the plastic surgeon (83 %). Among those reporting use at >24 h, the duration recommended for nonreconstruction cases was ''up to 1 week'' in 38 % and ''until drains removed'' in 39 %; this was similar for reconstruction cases. Conclusions. Cephalosporins are utilized uniformly as preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in breast operations requiring drains. However, use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis is strongly dependent on the presence of immediate breast reconstruction. Consensus is lacking on the role of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in breast operations utilizing drains.

AB - Background. To assess national practice patterns regarding use of perioperative antibiotics by surgeons performing breast operations requiring drainage tubes. Methods. The members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) were surveyed regarding use of perioperative antibiotics for breast operations requiring drains, with or without immediate tissue expander or implant reconstruction. Results. Of 2,857 ASBrS members contacted, 917 (32 %) responded; all self-identified as surgeons. Of 905 evaluable respondents, most described themselves as general surgeons (46 %) or breast surgeons (46 %). For cases in which drains are anticipated, most respondents (86 %) reported routine use of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics, with 99 % selecting cephalosporins. Use of antibiotic >24 h postoperatively varied by whether or not reconstruction was performed. In nonreconstruction cases, the majority (76 %) reported ''never/almost never'' prescribing antibiotics beyond the 24-h postoperative period, but 16 % reported ''always/almost always.'' In reconstruction cases, the majority (58 %) reported routine antibiotic use beyond 24 h, and the primary driver of the decision to use antibiotics was reported to be the plastic surgeon (83 %). Among those reporting use at >24 h, the duration recommended for nonreconstruction cases was ''up to 1 week'' in 38 % and ''until drains removed'' in 39 %; this was similar for reconstruction cases. Conclusions. Cephalosporins are utilized uniformly as preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in breast operations requiring drains. However, use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis is strongly dependent on the presence of immediate breast reconstruction. Consensus is lacking on the role of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in breast operations utilizing drains.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868212581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868212581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1245/s10434-012-2477-1

DO - 10.1245/s10434-012-2477-1

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 3205

EP - 3211

JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology

JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology

SN - 1068-9265

IS - 10

ER -