Narrow angles and angle closure: Anatomic reasons for earlier closure of the superior portion of the iridocorneal angle

Syril Dorairaj, Celso Tello, Jeffrey M. Liebmann, Robert Ritch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To quantitatively investigate the ultrasound biomicroscopic features of eyes with asymmetric narrowing of the iridocorneal angles. Methods: Asymmetric angles were defined as those differing by 2 or more Shaffer grades between the superior and inferior angles. We performed ultrasound biomicroscopy on 18 eyes in 18 patients. Measurements of the following were made: the angle recess area, the triangular area bordered by the anterior iris surface, the corneal endothelium, and a line drawn from 750 μm anterior to the scleral spur; the y-intercept, the estimated angle opening distance at the level of the scleral spur; acceleration, which describes how rapidly the angle widens from the iris root; trabecular-ciliary process distance, the distance between the trabecular meshwork and the ciliary body at 500 μm anterior to the scleral spur; and angle recess-iris insertion distance, the distance between the apex of the angle recess and the iris insertion on the ciliary body face. Results: In the superior angle, 11 eyes developed appositional closure, 10 with B-type (apposition beginning at the iris root) and 1 with S-type (apposition beginning at the line of Schwalbe). Four eyes also had apposition inferiorly (1 B-type and 3 S-types). The y-intercept, angle recess areas, trabecular-ciliary process distance, and angle recess-iris insertion distance were significantly smaller in the superior quadrant. S-type angles predominated in the inferior angle, and B-type angles did in the superior angle, indicating a more posterior insertion of the iris in the wider inferior angles. Conclusions: Asymmetry in eyes with narrow angles occurs because of differences in iris insertion position on the ciliary body face and from asymmetry of the ciliary body position.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)734-739
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of ophthalmology
Volume125
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Iris
Ciliary Body
Acoustic Microscopy
Trabecular Meshwork
Corneal Endothelium

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Narrow angles and angle closure : Anatomic reasons for earlier closure of the superior portion of the iridocorneal angle. / Dorairaj, Syril; Tello, Celso; Liebmann, Jeffrey M.; Ritch, Robert.

In: Archives of ophthalmology, Vol. 125, No. 6, 01.06.2007, p. 734-739.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{67ca6f9c1bfa4b5cba349428f1c286f8,
title = "Narrow angles and angle closure: Anatomic reasons for earlier closure of the superior portion of the iridocorneal angle",
abstract = "Objective: To quantitatively investigate the ultrasound biomicroscopic features of eyes with asymmetric narrowing of the iridocorneal angles. Methods: Asymmetric angles were defined as those differing by 2 or more Shaffer grades between the superior and inferior angles. We performed ultrasound biomicroscopy on 18 eyes in 18 patients. Measurements of the following were made: the angle recess area, the triangular area bordered by the anterior iris surface, the corneal endothelium, and a line drawn from 750 μm anterior to the scleral spur; the y-intercept, the estimated angle opening distance at the level of the scleral spur; acceleration, which describes how rapidly the angle widens from the iris root; trabecular-ciliary process distance, the distance between the trabecular meshwork and the ciliary body at 500 μm anterior to the scleral spur; and angle recess-iris insertion distance, the distance between the apex of the angle recess and the iris insertion on the ciliary body face. Results: In the superior angle, 11 eyes developed appositional closure, 10 with B-type (apposition beginning at the iris root) and 1 with S-type (apposition beginning at the line of Schwalbe). Four eyes also had apposition inferiorly (1 B-type and 3 S-types). The y-intercept, angle recess areas, trabecular-ciliary process distance, and angle recess-iris insertion distance were significantly smaller in the superior quadrant. S-type angles predominated in the inferior angle, and B-type angles did in the superior angle, indicating a more posterior insertion of the iris in the wider inferior angles. Conclusions: Asymmetry in eyes with narrow angles occurs because of differences in iris insertion position on the ciliary body face and from asymmetry of the ciliary body position.",
author = "Syril Dorairaj and Celso Tello and Liebmann, {Jeffrey M.} and Robert Ritch",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archopht.125.6.734",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "734--739",
journal = "JAMA Ophthalmology",
issn = "2168-6165",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Narrow angles and angle closure

T2 - Anatomic reasons for earlier closure of the superior portion of the iridocorneal angle

AU - Dorairaj, Syril

AU - Tello, Celso

AU - Liebmann, Jeffrey M.

AU - Ritch, Robert

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - Objective: To quantitatively investigate the ultrasound biomicroscopic features of eyes with asymmetric narrowing of the iridocorneal angles. Methods: Asymmetric angles were defined as those differing by 2 or more Shaffer grades between the superior and inferior angles. We performed ultrasound biomicroscopy on 18 eyes in 18 patients. Measurements of the following were made: the angle recess area, the triangular area bordered by the anterior iris surface, the corneal endothelium, and a line drawn from 750 μm anterior to the scleral spur; the y-intercept, the estimated angle opening distance at the level of the scleral spur; acceleration, which describes how rapidly the angle widens from the iris root; trabecular-ciliary process distance, the distance between the trabecular meshwork and the ciliary body at 500 μm anterior to the scleral spur; and angle recess-iris insertion distance, the distance between the apex of the angle recess and the iris insertion on the ciliary body face. Results: In the superior angle, 11 eyes developed appositional closure, 10 with B-type (apposition beginning at the iris root) and 1 with S-type (apposition beginning at the line of Schwalbe). Four eyes also had apposition inferiorly (1 B-type and 3 S-types). The y-intercept, angle recess areas, trabecular-ciliary process distance, and angle recess-iris insertion distance were significantly smaller in the superior quadrant. S-type angles predominated in the inferior angle, and B-type angles did in the superior angle, indicating a more posterior insertion of the iris in the wider inferior angles. Conclusions: Asymmetry in eyes with narrow angles occurs because of differences in iris insertion position on the ciliary body face and from asymmetry of the ciliary body position.

AB - Objective: To quantitatively investigate the ultrasound biomicroscopic features of eyes with asymmetric narrowing of the iridocorneal angles. Methods: Asymmetric angles were defined as those differing by 2 or more Shaffer grades between the superior and inferior angles. We performed ultrasound biomicroscopy on 18 eyes in 18 patients. Measurements of the following were made: the angle recess area, the triangular area bordered by the anterior iris surface, the corneal endothelium, and a line drawn from 750 μm anterior to the scleral spur; the y-intercept, the estimated angle opening distance at the level of the scleral spur; acceleration, which describes how rapidly the angle widens from the iris root; trabecular-ciliary process distance, the distance between the trabecular meshwork and the ciliary body at 500 μm anterior to the scleral spur; and angle recess-iris insertion distance, the distance between the apex of the angle recess and the iris insertion on the ciliary body face. Results: In the superior angle, 11 eyes developed appositional closure, 10 with B-type (apposition beginning at the iris root) and 1 with S-type (apposition beginning at the line of Schwalbe). Four eyes also had apposition inferiorly (1 B-type and 3 S-types). The y-intercept, angle recess areas, trabecular-ciliary process distance, and angle recess-iris insertion distance were significantly smaller in the superior quadrant. S-type angles predominated in the inferior angle, and B-type angles did in the superior angle, indicating a more posterior insertion of the iris in the wider inferior angles. Conclusions: Asymmetry in eyes with narrow angles occurs because of differences in iris insertion position on the ciliary body face and from asymmetry of the ciliary body position.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250353984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250353984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archopht.125.6.734

DO - 10.1001/archopht.125.6.734

M3 - Article

C2 - 17562981

AN - SCOPUS:34250353984

VL - 125

SP - 734

EP - 739

JO - JAMA Ophthalmology

JF - JAMA Ophthalmology

SN - 2168-6165

IS - 6

ER -