Multitasking and the neuroethics of distraction

Williamp Cheshire

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multitasking, which requires shifting mental focus among simultaneous tasks, has become increasingly prevalent in our digitally connected culture. Whereas the clinical environment necessarily entails attending to multiple demands competing for the healthcare professional's time and attention, excessive multitasking has been shown to lead to distraction, information loss, and cognitive overload with the potential for medical error. Moral reasoning, which is essential for clinical ethics, engages brain systems that may also be susceptible to impaired performance when external streams of information intrude or interrupt. Intentionally limiting multitasking habits is important for the sake of both patient safety and medical ethics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-25
Number of pages7
JournalEthics and Medicine
Volume31
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Clinical Ethics
Medical Errors
Medical Ethics
Patient Safety
Habits
Delivery of Health Care
Brain
Neuroethics
Distraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Religious studies
  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Multitasking and the neuroethics of distraction. / Cheshire, Williamp.

In: Ethics and Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2015, p. 19-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Cheshire, W 2015, 'Multitasking and the neuroethics of distraction', Ethics and Medicine, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 19-25.
Cheshire, Williamp. / Multitasking and the neuroethics of distraction. In: Ethics and Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 19-25.
@article{3ecf5aa89e7d4d03aeb0c43a69c766a3,
title = "Multitasking and the neuroethics of distraction",
abstract = "Multitasking, which requires shifting mental focus among simultaneous tasks, has become increasingly prevalent in our digitally connected culture. Whereas the clinical environment necessarily entails attending to multiple demands competing for the healthcare professional's time and attention, excessive multitasking has been shown to lead to distraction, information loss, and cognitive overload with the potential for medical error. Moral reasoning, which is essential for clinical ethics, engages brain systems that may also be susceptible to impaired performance when external streams of information intrude or interrupt. Intentionally limiting multitasking habits is important for the sake of both patient safety and medical ethics.",
author = "Williamp Cheshire",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "19--25",
journal = "Ethics and Medicine",
issn = "0266-688X",
publisher = "Bioethics Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multitasking and the neuroethics of distraction

AU - Cheshire, Williamp

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Multitasking, which requires shifting mental focus among simultaneous tasks, has become increasingly prevalent in our digitally connected culture. Whereas the clinical environment necessarily entails attending to multiple demands competing for the healthcare professional's time and attention, excessive multitasking has been shown to lead to distraction, information loss, and cognitive overload with the potential for medical error. Moral reasoning, which is essential for clinical ethics, engages brain systems that may also be susceptible to impaired performance when external streams of information intrude or interrupt. Intentionally limiting multitasking habits is important for the sake of both patient safety and medical ethics.

AB - Multitasking, which requires shifting mental focus among simultaneous tasks, has become increasingly prevalent in our digitally connected culture. Whereas the clinical environment necessarily entails attending to multiple demands competing for the healthcare professional's time and attention, excessive multitasking has been shown to lead to distraction, information loss, and cognitive overload with the potential for medical error. Moral reasoning, which is essential for clinical ethics, engages brain systems that may also be susceptible to impaired performance when external streams of information intrude or interrupt. Intentionally limiting multitasking habits is important for the sake of both patient safety and medical ethics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978764104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978764104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84978764104

VL - 31

SP - 19

EP - 25

JO - Ethics and Medicine

JF - Ethics and Medicine

SN - 0266-688X

IS - 1

ER -