Multicenter trial of the clinical activities tool to document the comparability of clinical experiences in obstetrics-gynecology clerkships

Annamarie Connolly, Katrina Davis, Petra Marcela Casey, Lisa Keder, Archana Pradhan, Renee Page, Marilyn Raymond, John Dalrymple

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the implementation of the Clinical Activities Tool (CAT) for facilitating Liaison Committee on Medical Education-required documentation of the comparability of obstetrics-gynecology (ob/gyn) clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback at multiple sites during one academic year. Method: Ob/gyn clerkship students at six U.S. medical schools were given CATs to guide and document clinical experiences from June 2006 to June 2007. Students used a paper CAT at five institutions and an electronic version at one. CATs listed procedures, skills, and topics recommended by the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics and included a midclerkship feedback section. Resident/faculty signatures documented completion of items for paper CATs. Electronic CAT item completion was self-documented by students. Students completed a questionnaire on CAT use. Results: At the six schools, 876 medical students rotated on ob/gyn clerkships; 808 (92%) submitted CATs. Mean item completion rate was 72%. Five of six schools achieved ≥70% completion rates. Midclerkship feedback signature rates ranged from 0% to 97.8% with four of six schools reporting ≥65% feedback. Comparability of clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback was successfully documented across sites for each institution (number of sites: range = 1-9; median = 5). Questionnaires on CAT use were submitted by 231 students (26%). Students using paper CATs reported that doing so clarified course objectives (93%), provided clerkship guidance/structure (93%), and facilitated interaction with faculty/residents (76%/74%). Students rated the electronic CAT significantly less favorably. Conclusions: CAT implementation at multiple institutions for documentation of student clinical experience comparability and midclerkship feedback was successful. Students evaluated the paper CAT positively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)716-720
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume85
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

gynecology
obstetrics
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Multicenter Studies
CAT
Students
experience
student
electronics
Documentation
school
documentation
resident
questionnaire
Medical Education
Medical Schools
Medical Students
medical student
university teacher

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Multicenter trial of the clinical activities tool to document the comparability of clinical experiences in obstetrics-gynecology clerkships. / Connolly, Annamarie; Davis, Katrina; Casey, Petra Marcela; Keder, Lisa; Pradhan, Archana; Page, Renee; Raymond, Marilyn; Dalrymple, John.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 85, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 716-720.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Connolly, Annamarie ; Davis, Katrina ; Casey, Petra Marcela ; Keder, Lisa ; Pradhan, Archana ; Page, Renee ; Raymond, Marilyn ; Dalrymple, John. / Multicenter trial of the clinical activities tool to document the comparability of clinical experiences in obstetrics-gynecology clerkships. In: Academic Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 85, No. 4. pp. 716-720.
@article{2db3cd4ccfdb40b7b44967e73036633d,
title = "Multicenter trial of the clinical activities tool to document the comparability of clinical experiences in obstetrics-gynecology clerkships",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the implementation of the Clinical Activities Tool (CAT) for facilitating Liaison Committee on Medical Education-required documentation of the comparability of obstetrics-gynecology (ob/gyn) clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback at multiple sites during one academic year. Method: Ob/gyn clerkship students at six U.S. medical schools were given CATs to guide and document clinical experiences from June 2006 to June 2007. Students used a paper CAT at five institutions and an electronic version at one. CATs listed procedures, skills, and topics recommended by the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics and included a midclerkship feedback section. Resident/faculty signatures documented completion of items for paper CATs. Electronic CAT item completion was self-documented by students. Students completed a questionnaire on CAT use. Results: At the six schools, 876 medical students rotated on ob/gyn clerkships; 808 (92{\%}) submitted CATs. Mean item completion rate was 72{\%}. Five of six schools achieved ≥70{\%} completion rates. Midclerkship feedback signature rates ranged from 0{\%} to 97.8{\%} with four of six schools reporting ≥65{\%} feedback. Comparability of clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback was successfully documented across sites for each institution (number of sites: range = 1-9; median = 5). Questionnaires on CAT use were submitted by 231 students (26{\%}). Students using paper CATs reported that doing so clarified course objectives (93{\%}), provided clerkship guidance/structure (93{\%}), and facilitated interaction with faculty/residents (76{\%}/74{\%}). Students rated the electronic CAT significantly less favorably. Conclusions: CAT implementation at multiple institutions for documentation of student clinical experience comparability and midclerkship feedback was successful. Students evaluated the paper CAT positively.",
author = "Annamarie Connolly and Katrina Davis and Casey, {Petra Marcela} and Lisa Keder and Archana Pradhan and Renee Page and Marilyn Raymond and John Dalrymple",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d2a535",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "716--720",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multicenter trial of the clinical activities tool to document the comparability of clinical experiences in obstetrics-gynecology clerkships

AU - Connolly, Annamarie

AU - Davis, Katrina

AU - Casey, Petra Marcela

AU - Keder, Lisa

AU - Pradhan, Archana

AU - Page, Renee

AU - Raymond, Marilyn

AU - Dalrymple, John

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Purpose: To assess the implementation of the Clinical Activities Tool (CAT) for facilitating Liaison Committee on Medical Education-required documentation of the comparability of obstetrics-gynecology (ob/gyn) clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback at multiple sites during one academic year. Method: Ob/gyn clerkship students at six U.S. medical schools were given CATs to guide and document clinical experiences from June 2006 to June 2007. Students used a paper CAT at five institutions and an electronic version at one. CATs listed procedures, skills, and topics recommended by the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics and included a midclerkship feedback section. Resident/faculty signatures documented completion of items for paper CATs. Electronic CAT item completion was self-documented by students. Students completed a questionnaire on CAT use. Results: At the six schools, 876 medical students rotated on ob/gyn clerkships; 808 (92%) submitted CATs. Mean item completion rate was 72%. Five of six schools achieved ≥70% completion rates. Midclerkship feedback signature rates ranged from 0% to 97.8% with four of six schools reporting ≥65% feedback. Comparability of clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback was successfully documented across sites for each institution (number of sites: range = 1-9; median = 5). Questionnaires on CAT use were submitted by 231 students (26%). Students using paper CATs reported that doing so clarified course objectives (93%), provided clerkship guidance/structure (93%), and facilitated interaction with faculty/residents (76%/74%). Students rated the electronic CAT significantly less favorably. Conclusions: CAT implementation at multiple institutions for documentation of student clinical experience comparability and midclerkship feedback was successful. Students evaluated the paper CAT positively.

AB - Purpose: To assess the implementation of the Clinical Activities Tool (CAT) for facilitating Liaison Committee on Medical Education-required documentation of the comparability of obstetrics-gynecology (ob/gyn) clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback at multiple sites during one academic year. Method: Ob/gyn clerkship students at six U.S. medical schools were given CATs to guide and document clinical experiences from June 2006 to June 2007. Students used a paper CAT at five institutions and an electronic version at one. CATs listed procedures, skills, and topics recommended by the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics and included a midclerkship feedback section. Resident/faculty signatures documented completion of items for paper CATs. Electronic CAT item completion was self-documented by students. Students completed a questionnaire on CAT use. Results: At the six schools, 876 medical students rotated on ob/gyn clerkships; 808 (92%) submitted CATs. Mean item completion rate was 72%. Five of six schools achieved ≥70% completion rates. Midclerkship feedback signature rates ranged from 0% to 97.8% with four of six schools reporting ≥65% feedback. Comparability of clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback was successfully documented across sites for each institution (number of sites: range = 1-9; median = 5). Questionnaires on CAT use were submitted by 231 students (26%). Students using paper CATs reported that doing so clarified course objectives (93%), provided clerkship guidance/structure (93%), and facilitated interaction with faculty/residents (76%/74%). Students rated the electronic CAT significantly less favorably. Conclusions: CAT implementation at multiple institutions for documentation of student clinical experience comparability and midclerkship feedback was successful. Students evaluated the paper CAT positively.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951674905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951674905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d2a535

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d2a535

M3 - Article

C2 - 20354394

AN - SCOPUS:77951674905

VL - 85

SP - 716

EP - 720

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 4

ER -