Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of confocal laser endomicroscopy assessment of residual metaplasia after mucosal ablation or resection of GI neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus

Michael B. Wallace, Juliana Crook, Michael Saunders, Laurence Lovat, Emmanuel Coron, Irving Waxman, Prateek Sharma, Joo H. Hwang, Matthew Banks, Mathieu Depreville, Jean P. Galmiche, Vani Konda, Nancy N. Diehl, Herbert C. Wolfsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Endoscopic ablation is an accepted standard for neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE). Eradication of all glandular mucosa in the distal esophagus cannot be reliably determined at endoscopy. To assess if use of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) in addition to high-definition white light (HDWL) could aid in determination of residual BE. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, clinical trial. Academic medical centers. Patients with Barrett's esophagus undergoing ablation. After an initial attempt at ablation, patients were followed-up either with HDWL endoscopy or HDWL plus pCLE, with treatment of residual metaplasia or neoplasia based on endoscopic findings and pCLE used to avoid overtreatment. The proportion of optimally treated patients, defined as those with residual BE who were treated and had complete ablation plus those without BE who were not treated and had no evidence of disease at follow-up. The study was halted at the planned interim analysis based on a priori criteria. After enrollment was halted, all patients who had been randomized were followed to study completion. Among the 119 patients with follow-up, there was no difference in the proportion of patients achieving optimal outcomes in the two groups (15/57, 26% for HDWL; 17/62, 27% with HDWL + pCLE). Other outcomes were similar in the two groups. The study was closed after the interim analysis due to low conditional power resulting from lack of difference between groups as well as higher-than-expected residual Barrett's esophagus in both arms. This study yields no evidence that the addition of pCLE to HDWL imaging for detection of residual Barrett's esophagus or neoplasia can provide improved treatment. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01032044.)

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume76
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Barrett Esophagus
Metaplasia
Lasers
Randomized Controlled Trials
Light
Neoplasms
Endoscopy
Esophagus
Mucous Membrane
Clinical Trials
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of confocal laser endomicroscopy assessment of residual metaplasia after mucosal ablation or resection of GI neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. / Wallace, Michael B.; Crook, Juliana; Saunders, Michael; Lovat, Laurence; Coron, Emmanuel; Waxman, Irving; Sharma, Prateek; Hwang, Joo H.; Banks, Matthew; Depreville, Mathieu; Galmiche, Jean P.; Konda, Vani; Diehl, Nancy N.; Wolfsen, Herbert C.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 76, No. 3, 09.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wallace, MB, Crook, J, Saunders, M, Lovat, L, Coron, E, Waxman, I, Sharma, P, Hwang, JH, Banks, M, Depreville, M, Galmiche, JP, Konda, V, Diehl, NN & Wolfsen, HC 2012, 'Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of confocal laser endomicroscopy assessment of residual metaplasia after mucosal ablation or resection of GI neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 76, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.004
Wallace, Michael B. ; Crook, Juliana ; Saunders, Michael ; Lovat, Laurence ; Coron, Emmanuel ; Waxman, Irving ; Sharma, Prateek ; Hwang, Joo H. ; Banks, Matthew ; Depreville, Mathieu ; Galmiche, Jean P. ; Konda, Vani ; Diehl, Nancy N. ; Wolfsen, Herbert C. / Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of confocal laser endomicroscopy assessment of residual metaplasia after mucosal ablation or resection of GI neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2012 ; Vol. 76, No. 3.
@article{595412b83a5e41db92bdd4ca3df0acf8,
title = "Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of confocal laser endomicroscopy assessment of residual metaplasia after mucosal ablation or resection of GI neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus",
abstract = "Endoscopic ablation is an accepted standard for neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE). Eradication of all glandular mucosa in the distal esophagus cannot be reliably determined at endoscopy. To assess if use of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) in addition to high-definition white light (HDWL) could aid in determination of residual BE. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, clinical trial. Academic medical centers. Patients with Barrett's esophagus undergoing ablation. After an initial attempt at ablation, patients were followed-up either with HDWL endoscopy or HDWL plus pCLE, with treatment of residual metaplasia or neoplasia based on endoscopic findings and pCLE used to avoid overtreatment. The proportion of optimally treated patients, defined as those with residual BE who were treated and had complete ablation plus those without BE who were not treated and had no evidence of disease at follow-up. The study was halted at the planned interim analysis based on a priori criteria. After enrollment was halted, all patients who had been randomized were followed to study completion. Among the 119 patients with follow-up, there was no difference in the proportion of patients achieving optimal outcomes in the two groups (15/57, 26{\%} for HDWL; 17/62, 27{\%} with HDWL + pCLE). Other outcomes were similar in the two groups. The study was closed after the interim analysis due to low conditional power resulting from lack of difference between groups as well as higher-than-expected residual Barrett's esophagus in both arms. This study yields no evidence that the addition of pCLE to HDWL imaging for detection of residual Barrett's esophagus or neoplasia can provide improved treatment. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01032044.)",
author = "Wallace, {Michael B.} and Juliana Crook and Michael Saunders and Laurence Lovat and Emmanuel Coron and Irving Waxman and Prateek Sharma and Hwang, {Joo H.} and Matthew Banks and Mathieu Depreville and Galmiche, {Jean P.} and Vani Konda and Diehl, {Nancy N.} and Wolfsen, {Herbert C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of confocal laser endomicroscopy assessment of residual metaplasia after mucosal ablation or resection of GI neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus

AU - Wallace, Michael B.

AU - Crook, Juliana

AU - Saunders, Michael

AU - Lovat, Laurence

AU - Coron, Emmanuel

AU - Waxman, Irving

AU - Sharma, Prateek

AU - Hwang, Joo H.

AU - Banks, Matthew

AU - Depreville, Mathieu

AU - Galmiche, Jean P.

AU - Konda, Vani

AU - Diehl, Nancy N.

AU - Wolfsen, Herbert C.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Endoscopic ablation is an accepted standard for neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE). Eradication of all glandular mucosa in the distal esophagus cannot be reliably determined at endoscopy. To assess if use of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) in addition to high-definition white light (HDWL) could aid in determination of residual BE. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, clinical trial. Academic medical centers. Patients with Barrett's esophagus undergoing ablation. After an initial attempt at ablation, patients were followed-up either with HDWL endoscopy or HDWL plus pCLE, with treatment of residual metaplasia or neoplasia based on endoscopic findings and pCLE used to avoid overtreatment. The proportion of optimally treated patients, defined as those with residual BE who were treated and had complete ablation plus those without BE who were not treated and had no evidence of disease at follow-up. The study was halted at the planned interim analysis based on a priori criteria. After enrollment was halted, all patients who had been randomized were followed to study completion. Among the 119 patients with follow-up, there was no difference in the proportion of patients achieving optimal outcomes in the two groups (15/57, 26% for HDWL; 17/62, 27% with HDWL + pCLE). Other outcomes were similar in the two groups. The study was closed after the interim analysis due to low conditional power resulting from lack of difference between groups as well as higher-than-expected residual Barrett's esophagus in both arms. This study yields no evidence that the addition of pCLE to HDWL imaging for detection of residual Barrett's esophagus or neoplasia can provide improved treatment. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01032044.)

AB - Endoscopic ablation is an accepted standard for neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE). Eradication of all glandular mucosa in the distal esophagus cannot be reliably determined at endoscopy. To assess if use of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) in addition to high-definition white light (HDWL) could aid in determination of residual BE. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, clinical trial. Academic medical centers. Patients with Barrett's esophagus undergoing ablation. After an initial attempt at ablation, patients were followed-up either with HDWL endoscopy or HDWL plus pCLE, with treatment of residual metaplasia or neoplasia based on endoscopic findings and pCLE used to avoid overtreatment. The proportion of optimally treated patients, defined as those with residual BE who were treated and had complete ablation plus those without BE who were not treated and had no evidence of disease at follow-up. The study was halted at the planned interim analysis based on a priori criteria. After enrollment was halted, all patients who had been randomized were followed to study completion. Among the 119 patients with follow-up, there was no difference in the proportion of patients achieving optimal outcomes in the two groups (15/57, 26% for HDWL; 17/62, 27% with HDWL + pCLE). Other outcomes were similar in the two groups. The study was closed after the interim analysis due to low conditional power resulting from lack of difference between groups as well as higher-than-expected residual Barrett's esophagus in both arms. This study yields no evidence that the addition of pCLE to HDWL imaging for detection of residual Barrett's esophagus or neoplasia can provide improved treatment. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01032044.)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865128576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865128576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.004

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.004

M3 - Article

VL - 76

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 3

ER -