MR Imaging of the Meniscus

Review, Current Trends, and Clinical Implications

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

MR imaging is the preferred imaging modality for evaluating the meniscus. Overall, when strict criteria are followed, it is accurate in diagnosing meniscal tears in patients who have not had prior meniscal surgery. However, an accurate interpretation requires a through knowledge of the normal meniscal anatomy, common meniscal variants, and common diagnostic pitfalls. In this article, the author emphasizes the importance of describing meniscal tears properly and discusses treatment options. Diagnosing a recurrent tear is more complicated in patients who have had prior partial meniscal resection or repair, and the use of MR arthrography in this group of patients is discussed. Recent developments in areas such as 3 T and parallel imaging offer promise for accurate meniscal evaluation with even shorter scan times.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-123
Number of pages21
JournalMagnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tears
Arthrography
Anatomy
Meniscus
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

MR Imaging of the Meniscus : Review, Current Trends, and Clinical Implications. / Fox, Michael.

In: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.02.2007, p. 103-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{6a1874f41580446bba240a8422bc465e,
title = "MR Imaging of the Meniscus: Review, Current Trends, and Clinical Implications",
abstract = "MR imaging is the preferred imaging modality for evaluating the meniscus. Overall, when strict criteria are followed, it is accurate in diagnosing meniscal tears in patients who have not had prior meniscal surgery. However, an accurate interpretation requires a through knowledge of the normal meniscal anatomy, common meniscal variants, and common diagnostic pitfalls. In this article, the author emphasizes the importance of describing meniscal tears properly and discusses treatment options. Diagnosing a recurrent tear is more complicated in patients who have had prior partial meniscal resection or repair, and the use of MR arthrography in this group of patients is discussed. Recent developments in areas such as 3 T and parallel imaging offer promise for accurate meniscal evaluation with even shorter scan times.",
author = "Michael Fox",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.mric.2007.02.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "103--123",
journal = "Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America",
issn = "1064-9689",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MR Imaging of the Meniscus

T2 - Review, Current Trends, and Clinical Implications

AU - Fox, Michael

PY - 2007/2/1

Y1 - 2007/2/1

N2 - MR imaging is the preferred imaging modality for evaluating the meniscus. Overall, when strict criteria are followed, it is accurate in diagnosing meniscal tears in patients who have not had prior meniscal surgery. However, an accurate interpretation requires a through knowledge of the normal meniscal anatomy, common meniscal variants, and common diagnostic pitfalls. In this article, the author emphasizes the importance of describing meniscal tears properly and discusses treatment options. Diagnosing a recurrent tear is more complicated in patients who have had prior partial meniscal resection or repair, and the use of MR arthrography in this group of patients is discussed. Recent developments in areas such as 3 T and parallel imaging offer promise for accurate meniscal evaluation with even shorter scan times.

AB - MR imaging is the preferred imaging modality for evaluating the meniscus. Overall, when strict criteria are followed, it is accurate in diagnosing meniscal tears in patients who have not had prior meniscal surgery. However, an accurate interpretation requires a through knowledge of the normal meniscal anatomy, common meniscal variants, and common diagnostic pitfalls. In this article, the author emphasizes the importance of describing meniscal tears properly and discusses treatment options. Diagnosing a recurrent tear is more complicated in patients who have had prior partial meniscal resection or repair, and the use of MR arthrography in this group of patients is discussed. Recent developments in areas such as 3 T and parallel imaging offer promise for accurate meniscal evaluation with even shorter scan times.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247872962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247872962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.mric.2007.02.004

DO - 10.1016/j.mric.2007.02.004

M3 - Review article

VL - 15

SP - 103

EP - 123

JO - Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

JF - Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

SN - 1064-9689

IS - 1

ER -