Purpose We assess the impact of obesity, as measured conventionally by body mass index vs excess adiposity as measured by fat mass index, on mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer, adjusting for the presence of skeletal muscle wasting. Materials and Methods This retrospective cohort study included 262 patients treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer between 2000 and 2008 at the Mayo Clinic. Lumbar skeletal muscle and adipose compartment areas were measured on preoperative imaging. Overall survival was compared according to gender specific consensus fat mass index and skeletal muscle index thresholds as well as conventional body mass index based criteria. Predictors of all cause mortality were assessed by multivariable modeling. Results Increasing body mass index correlated with improved overall survival (p=0.03) while fat mass index based obesity did not (p=0.08). After stratification by sarcopenia, no obesity related 5-year overall survival benefit was observed (68% vs 51.4%, p=0.2 obese vs normal and 40% vs 37.4%, p=0.7 sarcopenia vs sarcopenic/obese). On multivariable analysis class I obesity according to body mass index (HR 0.79, p=0.33) or fat mass index criteria (HR 0.85, p=0.45) was not independently associated with all cause mortality after adjusting for sarcopenia (HR 1.7, p=0.01) as well as age, performance status, pTN stage and smoking status. However, in patients with normal lean muscle mass each 1 kg/m<sup>2</sup> increase in weight or adipose mass was associated with a 7% to 14% decrease in all cause mortality. Conclusions After adjusting for lean muscle wasting, neither measurements of obesity nor adiposity were significantly associated with all cause mortality in patients treated with radical cystectomy, although subanalyses suggest a potential benefit among those with normal lean muscle mass.
- body mass index
ASJC Scopus subject areas