TY - JOUR
T1 - Molecular Classification of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Thymus
AU - Dinter, Helen
AU - Bohnenberger, Hanibal
AU - Beck, Julia
AU - Bornemann-Kolatzki, Kirsten
AU - Schütz, Ekkehard
AU - Küffer, Stefan
AU - Klein, Lukas
AU - Franks, Teri J.
AU - Roden, Anja
AU - Emmert, Alexander
AU - Hinterthaner, Marc
AU - Marino, Mirella
AU - Brcic, Luka
AU - Popper, Helmut
AU - Weis, Cleo Aron
AU - Pelosi, Giuseppe
AU - Marx, Alexander
AU - Ströbel, Philipp
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosure: Dr. Brcic has received grants from Astra Zeneca; has received personal fees from Roche, Astra Zeneca, and MSD; and has received nonfinancial support from Roche, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, MSD, and Abbvie.
Funding Information:
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Army/Navy/Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - Introduction: The WHO classification of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is also used to classify thymic NETs (TNETs) into typical and atypical carcinoid (TC and AC), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), and small cell carcinoma (SCC), but little is known about the usability of alternative classification systems. Methods: One hundred seven TNET (22 TC, 51 AC, 28 LCNEC, and 6 SCC) from 103 patients were classified according to the WHO, the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, and a grading-related PNET classification. Low coverage whole-genome sequencing and immunohistochemical studies were performed in 63 cases. A copy number instability (CNI) score was applied to compare tumors. Eleven LCNEC were further analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing. Morphologic classifications were tested against molecular features. Results: Whole-genome sequencing data fell into three clusters: CNIlow, CNIint, and CNIhigh. CNIlow and CNIint comprised not only TC and AC, but also six LCNECs. CNIhigh contained all SCC and nine LCNEC, but also three AC. No morphologic classification was able to predict the CNI cluster. Cases where primary tumors and metastases were available showed progression from low-grade to higher-grade histologies. Analysis of LCNEC revealed a subgroup of intermediate NET G3 tumors that differed from LCNEC by carcinoid morphology, expression of chromogranin, and negativity for enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (EZH2). Conclusions: TNETs fall into three molecular subgroups that are not reflected by the current WHO classification. Given the large overlap between TC and AC on the one hand, and AC and LCNEC on the other, we propose a morphomolecular grading system, Thy-NET G1-G3, instead of histologic classification for patient stratification and prognostication.
AB - Introduction: The WHO classification of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is also used to classify thymic NETs (TNETs) into typical and atypical carcinoid (TC and AC), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), and small cell carcinoma (SCC), but little is known about the usability of alternative classification systems. Methods: One hundred seven TNET (22 TC, 51 AC, 28 LCNEC, and 6 SCC) from 103 patients were classified according to the WHO, the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, and a grading-related PNET classification. Low coverage whole-genome sequencing and immunohistochemical studies were performed in 63 cases. A copy number instability (CNI) score was applied to compare tumors. Eleven LCNEC were further analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing. Morphologic classifications were tested against molecular features. Results: Whole-genome sequencing data fell into three clusters: CNIlow, CNIint, and CNIhigh. CNIlow and CNIint comprised not only TC and AC, but also six LCNECs. CNIhigh contained all SCC and nine LCNEC, but also three AC. No morphologic classification was able to predict the CNI cluster. Cases where primary tumors and metastases were available showed progression from low-grade to higher-grade histologies. Analysis of LCNEC revealed a subgroup of intermediate NET G3 tumors that differed from LCNEC by carcinoid morphology, expression of chromogranin, and negativity for enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (EZH2). Conclusions: TNETs fall into three molecular subgroups that are not reflected by the current WHO classification. Given the large overlap between TC and AC on the one hand, and AC and LCNEC on the other, we propose a morphomolecular grading system, Thy-NET G1-G3, instead of histologic classification for patient stratification and prognostication.
KW - Carcinoid
KW - Classification
KW - Genetic
KW - Molecular
KW - Neuroendocrine
KW - Thymus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067045104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067045104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.04.015
DO - 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.04.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 31042566
AN - SCOPUS:85067045104
SN - 1556-0864
VL - 14
SP - 1472
EP - 1483
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
IS - 8
ER -