Moderators of the benefits of psychoeducational interventions for men with prostate cancer

Vicki S. Helgeson, Stephen J. Lepore, David T Eton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors examined whether 3 individual difference variables - self-esteem, self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms - interacted with psychoeducational group interventions for men with prostate cancer (n = 250) to predict general and prostate-specific quality of life. Men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer were randomly assigned to an education intervention, an education plus group discussion intervention, or usual care and followed for 12 months. Eight groups of 10 to 12 men were convened in each condition. Men who began the study with lower self-esteem, lower prostate-specific self-efficacy, and higher depressive symptoms benefited the most from the interventions. Of these 3 moderator variables, the most consistent results emerged for self-esteem. That is, the benefits of the intervention were strongest for men with low self-esteem.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)348-354
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Psychology
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
Self Concept
Self Efficacy
Prostate
Epidemiologic Effect Modifiers
Depression
Education
Individuality
Quality of Life

Keywords

  • Prostate cancer
  • Psychoeducational intervention
  • Quality of life
  • Self-efficacy
  • Self-esteem

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Moderators of the benefits of psychoeducational interventions for men with prostate cancer. / Helgeson, Vicki S.; Lepore, Stephen J.; Eton, David T.

In: Health Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 3, 05.2006, p. 348-354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Helgeson, Vicki S. ; Lepore, Stephen J. ; Eton, David T. / Moderators of the benefits of psychoeducational interventions for men with prostate cancer. In: Health Psychology. 2006 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 348-354.
@article{7fd402da4f5043cf99c6851ff844171f,
title = "Moderators of the benefits of psychoeducational interventions for men with prostate cancer",
abstract = "The authors examined whether 3 individual difference variables - self-esteem, self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms - interacted with psychoeducational group interventions for men with prostate cancer (n = 250) to predict general and prostate-specific quality of life. Men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer were randomly assigned to an education intervention, an education plus group discussion intervention, or usual care and followed for 12 months. Eight groups of 10 to 12 men were convened in each condition. Men who began the study with lower self-esteem, lower prostate-specific self-efficacy, and higher depressive symptoms benefited the most from the interventions. Of these 3 moderator variables, the most consistent results emerged for self-esteem. That is, the benefits of the intervention were strongest for men with low self-esteem.",
keywords = "Prostate cancer, Psychoeducational intervention, Quality of life, Self-efficacy, Self-esteem",
author = "Helgeson, {Vicki S.} and Lepore, {Stephen J.} and Eton, {David T}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/0278-6133.25.3.348",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "348--354",
journal = "Health Psychology",
issn = "0278-6133",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moderators of the benefits of psychoeducational interventions for men with prostate cancer

AU - Helgeson, Vicki S.

AU - Lepore, Stephen J.

AU - Eton, David T

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - The authors examined whether 3 individual difference variables - self-esteem, self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms - interacted with psychoeducational group interventions for men with prostate cancer (n = 250) to predict general and prostate-specific quality of life. Men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer were randomly assigned to an education intervention, an education plus group discussion intervention, or usual care and followed for 12 months. Eight groups of 10 to 12 men were convened in each condition. Men who began the study with lower self-esteem, lower prostate-specific self-efficacy, and higher depressive symptoms benefited the most from the interventions. Of these 3 moderator variables, the most consistent results emerged for self-esteem. That is, the benefits of the intervention were strongest for men with low self-esteem.

AB - The authors examined whether 3 individual difference variables - self-esteem, self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms - interacted with psychoeducational group interventions for men with prostate cancer (n = 250) to predict general and prostate-specific quality of life. Men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer were randomly assigned to an education intervention, an education plus group discussion intervention, or usual care and followed for 12 months. Eight groups of 10 to 12 men were convened in each condition. Men who began the study with lower self-esteem, lower prostate-specific self-efficacy, and higher depressive symptoms benefited the most from the interventions. Of these 3 moderator variables, the most consistent results emerged for self-esteem. That is, the benefits of the intervention were strongest for men with low self-esteem.

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Psychoeducational intervention

KW - Quality of life

KW - Self-efficacy

KW - Self-esteem

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746427103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746427103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0278-6133.25.3.348

DO - 10.1037/0278-6133.25.3.348

M3 - Article

C2 - 16719606

AN - SCOPUS:33746427103

VL - 25

SP - 348

EP - 354

JO - Health Psychology

JF - Health Psychology

SN - 0278-6133

IS - 3

ER -