TY - JOUR
T1 - Minimal residual disease in Myeloma
T2 - Application for clinical care and new drug registration
AU - Anderson, Kenneth C.
AU - Auclair, Daniel
AU - Adam, Stacey J.
AU - Agarwal, Amit
AU - Anderson, Melissa
AU - Avet-Loiseau, Herve
AU - Bustoros, Mark
AU - Chapman, Jessica
AU - Connors, Dana E.
AU - Dash, Ajeeta
AU - Bacco, Alessandra Di
AU - Du, Ling
AU - Facon, Thierry
AU - Flores-Montero, Juan
AU - Gay, Francesca
AU - Ghobrial, Irene M.
AU - Gormley, Nicole J.
AU - Gupta, Ira
AU - Higley, Howard
AU - Hillengass, Jens
AU - Kanapuru, Bindu
AU - Kazandjian, Dickran
AU - Kelloff, Gary J.
AU - Kirsch, Ilan R.
AU - Kremer, Brandon
AU - Landgren, Ola
AU - Lightbody, Elizabeth
AU - Lomas, Oliver C.
AU - Lonial, Sagar
AU - Mateos, María Victoria
AU - de Oca, Rocio Montes
AU - Mukundan, Lata
AU - Munshi, Nikhil C.
AU - Odonnell, Elizabeth K.
AU - Orfao, Alberto
AU - Paiva, Bruno
AU - Patel, Reshma
AU - Pugh, Trevor J.
AU - Ramasamy, Karthik
AU - Ray, Jill
AU - Roshal, Mikhail
AU - Ross, Jeremy A.
AU - Sigman, Caroline C.
AU - Thoren, Katie L.
AU - Trudel, Suzanne
AU - Ulaner, Gary
AU - Valente, Nancy
AU - Weiss, Brendan M.
AU - Zamagni, Elena
AU - Kumar, Shaji K.
N1 - Funding Information:
K.C. Anderson reports personal fees from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Precision Biosciences, Amgen, Windmill, Mana, Starton, Raqia, Oncopep, and C4Therapeutics outside the submitted work. A. Agarwal reports other support from BMS outside the submitted work, and A. Agarwal is an employee of BMS. M. Anderson reports personal fees from Takeda Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. M. Bustoros reports personal fees from Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Axiom Healthcare outside the submitted work. D.E. Connors reports stock ownership with Adaptive Biotechnologies. A. Dash reports other support from Takeda Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. A. Di Bacco reports other support from Takeda Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. L. Du reports other support from GlaxoSmithKline outside the submitted work. T. Facon reports personal fees from BMS, Takeda, Janssen, Karyopharm, Roche, Amgen, Oncopeptides, and AbbVie outside the submitted work. J. Flores-Montero reports grants from International Myeloma Foundation during the conduct of the study; in addition, J. Flores-Montero has a patent for Methods reagents, and kit for detecting minimal residual disease issued, licensed, and with royalties paid from Cytognos SL. F. Gay reports personal fees from Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, GSK, Roche, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Oncopeptides, and Bluebird Bio outside the submitted work. I.M. Ghobrial reports grants and personal fees from BMS, Janssen, Takeda, and Sanofi and personal fees from GSK during the conduct of the study. I. Gupta reports other support from GlaxoSmithKline during the conduct of the study, as well as other support from GlaxoSmithKline outside the submitted work. H. Higley reports other support from CCS Associates outside the submitted work. J. Hillengass reports personal fees from Amgen, Adaptive, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Oncopep-tides, Oncotracker, Sanofi, Skyline, and Takeda outside the submitted work. D. Kazandjian reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb outside the submitted work. I.R. Kirsch reports personal fees from Adaptive Biotechnologies during the conduct of the study, as well as personal fees from Adaptive Biotechnologies outside the submitted work; in addition, I.R. Kirsch is full-time employee of Adaptive Biotechnologies. B. Kremer reports other support from GlaxoSmithKline during the conduct of the study, as well as other support from GlaxoSmithKline outside the submitted work. O. Landgren reports grants and personal fees from Amgen, Celgene, and Janssen; other support from Takeda, Janssen, and Merck; personal fees from Glenmark, Seattle Genetics, Karyopharm, Adaptive Biotech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cellectis, and Oncopeptides; and grants from Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Perelman Family Foundation, NCI, and FDA outside the submitted work. S. Lonial reports personal fees from Takeda, Celgene, BMS, Amgen, Janssen,
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - The development of novel agents has transformed the treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma, with minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity now achievable across the entire disease spectrum. Bone marrow–based technologies to assess MRD, including approaches using next-generation flow and next-generation sequencing, have provided real-time clinical tools for the sensitive detection and monitoring of MRD in patients with multiple myeloma. Complementary liquid biopsy–based assays are now quickly progressing with some, such as mass spectrometry methods, being very close to clinical use, while others utilizing nucleic acid–based technologies are still developing and will prove important to further our understanding of the biology of MRD. On the regulatory front, multiple retrospective individual patient and clinical trial level meta-analyses have already shown and will continue to assess the potential of MRD as a surrogate for patient outcome. Given all this progress, it is not surprising that a number of clinicians are now considering using MRD to inform real-world clinical care of patients across the spectrum from smoldering myeloma to relapsed refractory multiple myeloma, with each disease setting presenting key challenges and questions that will need to be addressed through clinical trials. The pace of advances in targeted and immune therapies in multiple myeloma is unprecedented, and novel MRD-driven biomarker strategies are essential to accelerate innovative clinical trials leading to regulatory approval of novel treatments and continued improvement in patient outcomes.
AB - The development of novel agents has transformed the treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma, with minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity now achievable across the entire disease spectrum. Bone marrow–based technologies to assess MRD, including approaches using next-generation flow and next-generation sequencing, have provided real-time clinical tools for the sensitive detection and monitoring of MRD in patients with multiple myeloma. Complementary liquid biopsy–based assays are now quickly progressing with some, such as mass spectrometry methods, being very close to clinical use, while others utilizing nucleic acid–based technologies are still developing and will prove important to further our understanding of the biology of MRD. On the regulatory front, multiple retrospective individual patient and clinical trial level meta-analyses have already shown and will continue to assess the potential of MRD as a surrogate for patient outcome. Given all this progress, it is not surprising that a number of clinicians are now considering using MRD to inform real-world clinical care of patients across the spectrum from smoldering myeloma to relapsed refractory multiple myeloma, with each disease setting presenting key challenges and questions that will need to be addressed through clinical trials. The pace of advances in targeted and immune therapies in multiple myeloma is unprecedented, and novel MRD-driven biomarker strategies are essential to accelerate innovative clinical trials leading to regulatory approval of novel treatments and continued improvement in patient outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117279747&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85117279747&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1059
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1059
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34321279
AN - SCOPUS:85117279747
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 27
SP - 5195
EP - 5212
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 19
ER -