Midterm Outcomes of Reverse (Anteverting) Periacetabular Osteotomy in Patients with Hip Impingement Secondary to Acetabular Retroversion

Joshua A. Parry, Russell P. Swann, Jill A. Erickson, Christopher L. Peters, Robert T. Trousdale, Rafael J. Sierra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of data on the results of reverse (anteverting) periacetabular osteotomy (RPAO) for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) secondary to acetabular retroversion. Purpose: To evaluate the midterm outcomes of RPAO for FAI secondary to acetabular retroversion in those with and without hip dysplasia. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review identified RPAOs performed on patients with acetabular retroversion in isolation or in the setting of dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] ≤19°). Acetabular retroversion with FAI was diagnosed clinically and radiographically, with a positive crossover and posterior wall signs on pelvic radiographs. Twenty-three patients (30 hips) met the inclusion criteria; 20 hips with isolated retroversion and 10 hips with retroversion and hip dysplasia. The average age at the time of the procedure was 26 years (range, 13-45 years). The average length of follow-up was 5 years (range, 2-19 years). Harris Hip Score (HHS) and radiographs were evaluated preoperatively and at last follow-up. Results: The mean preoperative LCEA was 31° (range, 22°-49°) in the isolated retroversion group and 9° (range, -4° to 17°) in the dysplastic group. Postoperatively, the LCEA in the dysplastic group increased to 35° (range, 15°-46°) (P =.0001). The crossover sign corrected in 55% (11/20) of the isolated retroversion group and 80% (8/10) of the dysplastic group. The acetabular index (mean ± SD) improved from 1.3 ± 0.3 to 1.7 ± 0.6 (P =.0001), indicating improved anteversion. At the latest follow-up, the average HHS in the isolated retroversion group increased from 58 preoperatively (range, 23-77) to 93 (range, 68-100) (P =.0001); the HHS in the dysplastic group improved from 49 (range, 20-74) to 92 (range, 77-100) (P <.0001). Complication rates were similar in both groups. Excluding hardware removal, additional surgeries were performed in 13% (4/30). Conclusion: RPAO performed for FAI in the young patient with isolated acetabular retroversion or retroversion in the setting of dysplasia successfully improved clinical and radiographic results at mid- to long-term follow-up.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)672-676
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Osteotomy
Femoracetabular Impingement
Hip
Hip Dislocation
Cohort Studies

Keywords

  • acetabular retroversion
  • femoroacetabular impingement
  • hip dysplasia
  • periacetabular osteotomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Midterm Outcomes of Reverse (Anteverting) Periacetabular Osteotomy in Patients with Hip Impingement Secondary to Acetabular Retroversion. / Parry, Joshua A.; Swann, Russell P.; Erickson, Jill A.; Peters, Christopher L.; Trousdale, Robert T.; Sierra, Rafael J.

In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 44, No. 3, 01.03.2016, p. 672-676.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Parry, Joshua A. ; Swann, Russell P. ; Erickson, Jill A. ; Peters, Christopher L. ; Trousdale, Robert T. ; Sierra, Rafael J. / Midterm Outcomes of Reverse (Anteverting) Periacetabular Osteotomy in Patients with Hip Impingement Secondary to Acetabular Retroversion. In: American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 672-676.
@article{77473d3088fb4a098a75f54883200215,
title = "Midterm Outcomes of Reverse (Anteverting) Periacetabular Osteotomy in Patients with Hip Impingement Secondary to Acetabular Retroversion",
abstract = "Background: There is a paucity of data on the results of reverse (anteverting) periacetabular osteotomy (RPAO) for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) secondary to acetabular retroversion. Purpose: To evaluate the midterm outcomes of RPAO for FAI secondary to acetabular retroversion in those with and without hip dysplasia. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review identified RPAOs performed on patients with acetabular retroversion in isolation or in the setting of dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] ≤19°). Acetabular retroversion with FAI was diagnosed clinically and radiographically, with a positive crossover and posterior wall signs on pelvic radiographs. Twenty-three patients (30 hips) met the inclusion criteria; 20 hips with isolated retroversion and 10 hips with retroversion and hip dysplasia. The average age at the time of the procedure was 26 years (range, 13-45 years). The average length of follow-up was 5 years (range, 2-19 years). Harris Hip Score (HHS) and radiographs were evaluated preoperatively and at last follow-up. Results: The mean preoperative LCEA was 31° (range, 22°-49°) in the isolated retroversion group and 9° (range, -4° to 17°) in the dysplastic group. Postoperatively, the LCEA in the dysplastic group increased to 35° (range, 15°-46°) (P =.0001). The crossover sign corrected in 55{\%} (11/20) of the isolated retroversion group and 80{\%} (8/10) of the dysplastic group. The acetabular index (mean ± SD) improved from 1.3 ± 0.3 to 1.7 ± 0.6 (P =.0001), indicating improved anteversion. At the latest follow-up, the average HHS in the isolated retroversion group increased from 58 preoperatively (range, 23-77) to 93 (range, 68-100) (P =.0001); the HHS in the dysplastic group improved from 49 (range, 20-74) to 92 (range, 77-100) (P <.0001). Complication rates were similar in both groups. Excluding hardware removal, additional surgeries were performed in 13{\%} (4/30). Conclusion: RPAO performed for FAI in the young patient with isolated acetabular retroversion or retroversion in the setting of dysplasia successfully improved clinical and radiographic results at mid- to long-term follow-up.",
keywords = "acetabular retroversion, femoroacetabular impingement, hip dysplasia, periacetabular osteotomy",
author = "Parry, {Joshua A.} and Swann, {Russell P.} and Erickson, {Jill A.} and Peters, {Christopher L.} and Trousdale, {Robert T.} and Sierra, {Rafael J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0363546515620382",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "672--676",
journal = "American Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0363-5465",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Midterm Outcomes of Reverse (Anteverting) Periacetabular Osteotomy in Patients with Hip Impingement Secondary to Acetabular Retroversion

AU - Parry, Joshua A.

AU - Swann, Russell P.

AU - Erickson, Jill A.

AU - Peters, Christopher L.

AU - Trousdale, Robert T.

AU - Sierra, Rafael J.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Background: There is a paucity of data on the results of reverse (anteverting) periacetabular osteotomy (RPAO) for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) secondary to acetabular retroversion. Purpose: To evaluate the midterm outcomes of RPAO for FAI secondary to acetabular retroversion in those with and without hip dysplasia. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review identified RPAOs performed on patients with acetabular retroversion in isolation or in the setting of dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] ≤19°). Acetabular retroversion with FAI was diagnosed clinically and radiographically, with a positive crossover and posterior wall signs on pelvic radiographs. Twenty-three patients (30 hips) met the inclusion criteria; 20 hips with isolated retroversion and 10 hips with retroversion and hip dysplasia. The average age at the time of the procedure was 26 years (range, 13-45 years). The average length of follow-up was 5 years (range, 2-19 years). Harris Hip Score (HHS) and radiographs were evaluated preoperatively and at last follow-up. Results: The mean preoperative LCEA was 31° (range, 22°-49°) in the isolated retroversion group and 9° (range, -4° to 17°) in the dysplastic group. Postoperatively, the LCEA in the dysplastic group increased to 35° (range, 15°-46°) (P =.0001). The crossover sign corrected in 55% (11/20) of the isolated retroversion group and 80% (8/10) of the dysplastic group. The acetabular index (mean ± SD) improved from 1.3 ± 0.3 to 1.7 ± 0.6 (P =.0001), indicating improved anteversion. At the latest follow-up, the average HHS in the isolated retroversion group increased from 58 preoperatively (range, 23-77) to 93 (range, 68-100) (P =.0001); the HHS in the dysplastic group improved from 49 (range, 20-74) to 92 (range, 77-100) (P <.0001). Complication rates were similar in both groups. Excluding hardware removal, additional surgeries were performed in 13% (4/30). Conclusion: RPAO performed for FAI in the young patient with isolated acetabular retroversion or retroversion in the setting of dysplasia successfully improved clinical and radiographic results at mid- to long-term follow-up.

AB - Background: There is a paucity of data on the results of reverse (anteverting) periacetabular osteotomy (RPAO) for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) secondary to acetabular retroversion. Purpose: To evaluate the midterm outcomes of RPAO for FAI secondary to acetabular retroversion in those with and without hip dysplasia. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review identified RPAOs performed on patients with acetabular retroversion in isolation or in the setting of dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] ≤19°). Acetabular retroversion with FAI was diagnosed clinically and radiographically, with a positive crossover and posterior wall signs on pelvic radiographs. Twenty-three patients (30 hips) met the inclusion criteria; 20 hips with isolated retroversion and 10 hips with retroversion and hip dysplasia. The average age at the time of the procedure was 26 years (range, 13-45 years). The average length of follow-up was 5 years (range, 2-19 years). Harris Hip Score (HHS) and radiographs were evaluated preoperatively and at last follow-up. Results: The mean preoperative LCEA was 31° (range, 22°-49°) in the isolated retroversion group and 9° (range, -4° to 17°) in the dysplastic group. Postoperatively, the LCEA in the dysplastic group increased to 35° (range, 15°-46°) (P =.0001). The crossover sign corrected in 55% (11/20) of the isolated retroversion group and 80% (8/10) of the dysplastic group. The acetabular index (mean ± SD) improved from 1.3 ± 0.3 to 1.7 ± 0.6 (P =.0001), indicating improved anteversion. At the latest follow-up, the average HHS in the isolated retroversion group increased from 58 preoperatively (range, 23-77) to 93 (range, 68-100) (P =.0001); the HHS in the dysplastic group improved from 49 (range, 20-74) to 92 (range, 77-100) (P <.0001). Complication rates were similar in both groups. Excluding hardware removal, additional surgeries were performed in 13% (4/30). Conclusion: RPAO performed for FAI in the young patient with isolated acetabular retroversion or retroversion in the setting of dysplasia successfully improved clinical and radiographic results at mid- to long-term follow-up.

KW - acetabular retroversion

KW - femoroacetabular impingement

KW - hip dysplasia

KW - periacetabular osteotomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960153110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960153110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0363546515620382

DO - 10.1177/0363546515620382

M3 - Article

C2 - 26712890

AN - SCOPUS:84960153110

VL - 44

SP - 672

EP - 676

JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0363-5465

IS - 3

ER -