Microfracture in review: Careful evaluation and patient selection are paramount for treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee

M. H. Ansari, P. L. Sousa, M. J. Stuart, Aaron Krych

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Microfracture is a popular treatment option for articular cartilage lesions of the knee due to its cost-effectiveness, minimally invasive approach, and technical simplicity. However, the repair tissue remains limited to fibrocartilage, which is biomechanically inferior to hyaline cartilage. Microfracture requires careful patient selection based on anatomic location, lesion size, patient age, and activity level. Optimal indications are lesions ≤2-3 cm2 in high-demand patients under the age of 40 that are less than a year from injury. In addition, post-operative rehabilitation is an important consideration for optimal cartilage repair. Lesion size, location, and concomitant pathology should be assessed when formulating a rehabilitation plan. Separate protocols are established for femoral condylar and patellofemoral lesions. Results for microfracture are predominantly positive, however, long-term durability remains a concern. Studies comparing microfracture to osteochondral autograft transfer and autologous chondrocyte implantation note superior outcomes for these alternative treatments. However, there is still limited long-term data comparing the various cartilage repair techniques. Complications are rare; however, intralesional osseous overgrowth may occur. Augmentation techniques have been developed in order to improve repair tissue quality, including biomaterial scaffolds, growth factors, and stem cells.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-100
Number of pages14
JournalMinerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica
Volume66
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Stress Fractures
Articular Cartilage
Patient Selection
Knee
Cartilage
Rehabilitation
Fibrocartilage
Hyaline Cartilage
Autografts
Biocompatible Materials
Chondrocytes
Thigh
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
Stem Cells
Pathology
Wounds and Injuries
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Arthroscopy
  • Articular
  • Cartilage
  • Knee joint
  • Wounds and injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Microfracture in review : Careful evaluation and patient selection are paramount for treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee. / Ansari, M. H.; Sousa, P. L.; Stuart, M. J.; Krych, Aaron.

In: Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica, Vol. 66, No. 2, 01.04.2015, p. 87-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{e5610e8836ae4a76bf3f9bc1e44e842b,
title = "Microfracture in review: Careful evaluation and patient selection are paramount for treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee",
abstract = "Microfracture is a popular treatment option for articular cartilage lesions of the knee due to its cost-effectiveness, minimally invasive approach, and technical simplicity. However, the repair tissue remains limited to fibrocartilage, which is biomechanically inferior to hyaline cartilage. Microfracture requires careful patient selection based on anatomic location, lesion size, patient age, and activity level. Optimal indications are lesions ≤2-3 cm2 in high-demand patients under the age of 40 that are less than a year from injury. In addition, post-operative rehabilitation is an important consideration for optimal cartilage repair. Lesion size, location, and concomitant pathology should be assessed when formulating a rehabilitation plan. Separate protocols are established for femoral condylar and patellofemoral lesions. Results for microfracture are predominantly positive, however, long-term durability remains a concern. Studies comparing microfracture to osteochondral autograft transfer and autologous chondrocyte implantation note superior outcomes for these alternative treatments. However, there is still limited long-term data comparing the various cartilage repair techniques. Complications are rare; however, intralesional osseous overgrowth may occur. Augmentation techniques have been developed in order to improve repair tissue quality, including biomaterial scaffolds, growth factors, and stem cells.",
keywords = "Arthroscopy, Articular, Cartilage, Knee joint, Wounds and injuries",
author = "Ansari, {M. H.} and Sousa, {P. L.} and Stuart, {M. J.} and Aaron Krych",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "87--100",
journal = "Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica",
issn = "0394-3410",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microfracture in review

T2 - Careful evaluation and patient selection are paramount for treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee

AU - Ansari, M. H.

AU - Sousa, P. L.

AU - Stuart, M. J.

AU - Krych, Aaron

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Microfracture is a popular treatment option for articular cartilage lesions of the knee due to its cost-effectiveness, minimally invasive approach, and technical simplicity. However, the repair tissue remains limited to fibrocartilage, which is biomechanically inferior to hyaline cartilage. Microfracture requires careful patient selection based on anatomic location, lesion size, patient age, and activity level. Optimal indications are lesions ≤2-3 cm2 in high-demand patients under the age of 40 that are less than a year from injury. In addition, post-operative rehabilitation is an important consideration for optimal cartilage repair. Lesion size, location, and concomitant pathology should be assessed when formulating a rehabilitation plan. Separate protocols are established for femoral condylar and patellofemoral lesions. Results for microfracture are predominantly positive, however, long-term durability remains a concern. Studies comparing microfracture to osteochondral autograft transfer and autologous chondrocyte implantation note superior outcomes for these alternative treatments. However, there is still limited long-term data comparing the various cartilage repair techniques. Complications are rare; however, intralesional osseous overgrowth may occur. Augmentation techniques have been developed in order to improve repair tissue quality, including biomaterial scaffolds, growth factors, and stem cells.

AB - Microfracture is a popular treatment option for articular cartilage lesions of the knee due to its cost-effectiveness, minimally invasive approach, and technical simplicity. However, the repair tissue remains limited to fibrocartilage, which is biomechanically inferior to hyaline cartilage. Microfracture requires careful patient selection based on anatomic location, lesion size, patient age, and activity level. Optimal indications are lesions ≤2-3 cm2 in high-demand patients under the age of 40 that are less than a year from injury. In addition, post-operative rehabilitation is an important consideration for optimal cartilage repair. Lesion size, location, and concomitant pathology should be assessed when formulating a rehabilitation plan. Separate protocols are established for femoral condylar and patellofemoral lesions. Results for microfracture are predominantly positive, however, long-term durability remains a concern. Studies comparing microfracture to osteochondral autograft transfer and autologous chondrocyte implantation note superior outcomes for these alternative treatments. However, there is still limited long-term data comparing the various cartilage repair techniques. Complications are rare; however, intralesional osseous overgrowth may occur. Augmentation techniques have been developed in order to improve repair tissue quality, including biomaterial scaffolds, growth factors, and stem cells.

KW - Arthroscopy

KW - Articular

KW - Cartilage

KW - Knee joint

KW - Wounds and injuries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961994252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961994252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84961994252

VL - 66

SP - 87

EP - 100

JO - Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica

JF - Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica

SN - 0394-3410

IS - 2

ER -