Mesial temporal sclerosis: Diagnosis with fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus spin-echo MR imaging

Clifford R Jr. Jack, Charlotte Rydberg, Karl N. Krecke, Max R. Trenerry, Joseph E Parisi, John N. Rydberg, Gregory D Cascino, Stephen J Riederer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

150 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of a fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) sequence with that of a conventional double spin-echo (SE) sequence in the identification of increased signal intensity of the hippocampus in mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three blinded reviewers independently graded the FLAIR and SE images in 36 patients with intractable complex partial seizures. Reproducibility was tested. At histopathologic examination, the criterion standard, 32 patients had MTS. RESULTS: The accuracy of FLAIR images was 97% versus 91% for SE images (P < .02). The radiologists preferred the contrast properties of FLAIR to those of SE images by a significant margin (P < .0001). Surgical to nonsurgical hippocampal contrastto-noise ratio (C/N) measurements were better for the second echo of the SE sequence than for FLAIR (P < .002). Hippocampus-to-background tissue C/N was superior with FLAIR (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: FLAIR provides images with T2-weighted contrast and complete suppression of high signal intensity of CSF. Incorporation of a FLAIR sequence into the routine MR evaluation of patients with epilepsy is recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-373
Number of pages7
JournalRadiology
Volume199
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 1996

Fingerprint

Sclerosis
Sequence Inversion
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Noise
Hippocampus
Epilepsy
Seizures

Keywords

  • Brain, diseases
  • Brain, MR, 1341.121411, 1341.121413
  • Epilepsy
  • Magnetic resonance (MR), pulse sequences, 134.121411, 134.121413
  • Seizures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Mesial temporal sclerosis : Diagnosis with fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus spin-echo MR imaging. / Jack, Clifford R Jr.; Rydberg, Charlotte; Krecke, Karl N.; Trenerry, Max R.; Parisi, Joseph E; Rydberg, John N.; Cascino, Gregory D; Riederer, Stephen J.

In: Radiology, Vol. 199, No. 2, 05.1996, p. 367-373.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2e567c6925304bebb3fc0c9c6533f1ad,
title = "Mesial temporal sclerosis: Diagnosis with fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus spin-echo MR imaging",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of a fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) sequence with that of a conventional double spin-echo (SE) sequence in the identification of increased signal intensity of the hippocampus in mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three blinded reviewers independently graded the FLAIR and SE images in 36 patients with intractable complex partial seizures. Reproducibility was tested. At histopathologic examination, the criterion standard, 32 patients had MTS. RESULTS: The accuracy of FLAIR images was 97{\%} versus 91{\%} for SE images (P < .02). The radiologists preferred the contrast properties of FLAIR to those of SE images by a significant margin (P < .0001). Surgical to nonsurgical hippocampal contrastto-noise ratio (C/N) measurements were better for the second echo of the SE sequence than for FLAIR (P < .002). Hippocampus-to-background tissue C/N was superior with FLAIR (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: FLAIR provides images with T2-weighted contrast and complete suppression of high signal intensity of CSF. Incorporation of a FLAIR sequence into the routine MR evaluation of patients with epilepsy is recommended.",
keywords = "Brain, diseases, Brain, MR, 1341.121411, 1341.121413, Epilepsy, Magnetic resonance (MR), pulse sequences, 134.121411, 134.121413, Seizures",
author = "Jack, {Clifford R Jr.} and Charlotte Rydberg and Krecke, {Karl N.} and Trenerry, {Max R.} and Parisi, {Joseph E} and Rydberg, {John N.} and Cascino, {Gregory D} and Riederer, {Stephen J}",
year = "1996",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "199",
pages = "367--373",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mesial temporal sclerosis

T2 - Diagnosis with fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus spin-echo MR imaging

AU - Jack, Clifford R Jr.

AU - Rydberg, Charlotte

AU - Krecke, Karl N.

AU - Trenerry, Max R.

AU - Parisi, Joseph E

AU - Rydberg, John N.

AU - Cascino, Gregory D

AU - Riederer, Stephen J

PY - 1996/5

Y1 - 1996/5

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of a fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) sequence with that of a conventional double spin-echo (SE) sequence in the identification of increased signal intensity of the hippocampus in mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three blinded reviewers independently graded the FLAIR and SE images in 36 patients with intractable complex partial seizures. Reproducibility was tested. At histopathologic examination, the criterion standard, 32 patients had MTS. RESULTS: The accuracy of FLAIR images was 97% versus 91% for SE images (P < .02). The radiologists preferred the contrast properties of FLAIR to those of SE images by a significant margin (P < .0001). Surgical to nonsurgical hippocampal contrastto-noise ratio (C/N) measurements were better for the second echo of the SE sequence than for FLAIR (P < .002). Hippocampus-to-background tissue C/N was superior with FLAIR (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: FLAIR provides images with T2-weighted contrast and complete suppression of high signal intensity of CSF. Incorporation of a FLAIR sequence into the routine MR evaluation of patients with epilepsy is recommended.

AB - PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of a fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) sequence with that of a conventional double spin-echo (SE) sequence in the identification of increased signal intensity of the hippocampus in mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three blinded reviewers independently graded the FLAIR and SE images in 36 patients with intractable complex partial seizures. Reproducibility was tested. At histopathologic examination, the criterion standard, 32 patients had MTS. RESULTS: The accuracy of FLAIR images was 97% versus 91% for SE images (P < .02). The radiologists preferred the contrast properties of FLAIR to those of SE images by a significant margin (P < .0001). Surgical to nonsurgical hippocampal contrastto-noise ratio (C/N) measurements were better for the second echo of the SE sequence than for FLAIR (P < .002). Hippocampus-to-background tissue C/N was superior with FLAIR (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: FLAIR provides images with T2-weighted contrast and complete suppression of high signal intensity of CSF. Incorporation of a FLAIR sequence into the routine MR evaluation of patients with epilepsy is recommended.

KW - Brain, diseases

KW - Brain, MR, 1341.121411, 1341.121413

KW - Epilepsy

KW - Magnetic resonance (MR), pulse sequences, 134.121411, 134.121413

KW - Seizures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029879593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029879593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8668780

AN - SCOPUS:0029879593

VL - 199

SP - 367

EP - 373

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -