Abstract
Purpose: Prior studies of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and ovarian cancer survival have been limited by lack of hormone regimen detail and insufficient sample sizes. To address these limitations, a comprehensive analysis of 6419 post-menopausal women with pathologically confirmed ovarian carcinoma was conducted to examine the association between MHT use prior to diagnosis and survival. Methods: Data from 15 studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium were included. MHT use was examined by type (estrogen-only (ET) or estrogen+progestin (EPT)), duration, and recency of use relative to diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between hormone therapy use and survival. Logistic regression and mediation analysis was used to explore the relationship between MHT use and residual disease following debulking surgery. Results: Use of ET or EPT for at least five years prior to diagnosis was associated with better ovarian cancer survival (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.87). Among women with advanced stage, high-grade serous carcinoma, those who used MHT were less likely to have any macroscopic residual disease at the time of primary debulking surgery (p for trend <0.01 for duration of MHT use). Residual disease mediated some (17%) of the relationship between MHT and survival. Conclusions: Pre-diagnosis MHT use for 5+ years was a favorable prognostic factor for women with ovarian cancer. This large study is consistent with prior smaller studies, and further work is needed to understand the underlying mechanism.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 702-709 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Gynecologic oncology |
Volume | 158 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2020 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oncology
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Menopausal hormone therapy prior to the diagnosis of ovarian cancer is associated with improved survival'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
In: Gynecologic oncology, Vol. 158, No. 3, 09.2020, p. 702-709.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Menopausal hormone therapy prior to the diagnosis of ovarian cancer is associated with improved survival
AU - for the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
AU - Brieger, Katharine K.
AU - Peterson, Siri
AU - Lee, Alice W.
AU - Mukherjee, Bhramar
AU - Bakulski, Kelly M.
AU - Alimujiang, Aliya
AU - Anton-Culver, Hoda
AU - Anglesio, Michael S.
AU - Bandera, Elisa V.
AU - Berchuck, Andrew
AU - Bowtell, David D.L.
AU - Chenevix-Trench, Georgia
AU - Cho, Kathleen R.
AU - Cramer, Daniel W.
AU - DeFazio, Anna
AU - Doherty, Jennifer A.
AU - Fortner, Renée T.
AU - Garsed, Dale W.
AU - Gayther, Simon A.
AU - Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
AU - Goode, Ellen L.
AU - Goodman, Marc T.
AU - Harris, Holly R.
AU - Høgdall, Estrid
AU - Huntsman, David G.
AU - Shen, Hui
AU - Jensen, Allan
AU - Johnatty, Sharon E.
AU - Jordan, Susan J.
AU - Kjaer, Susanne K.
AU - Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta
AU - Lambrechts, Diether
AU - McLean, Karen
AU - Menon, Usha
AU - Modugno, Francesmary
AU - Moysich, Kirsten
AU - Ness, Roberta
AU - Ramus, Susan J.
AU - Richardson, Jean
AU - Risch, Harvey
AU - Rossing, Mary Anne
AU - Trabert, Britton
AU - Wentzensen, Nicolas
AU - Ziogas, Argyrios
AU - Terry, Kathryn L.
AU - Wu, Anna H.
AU - Hanley, Gillian E.
AU - Pharoah, Paul
AU - Webb, Penelope M.
AU - Pike, Malcolm C.
N1 - Funding Information: Funding for individual studies : AUS: The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS) was supported by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command ( DAMD17-01-1-0729 ), National Health & Medical Research Council of Australia ( 199600 , 400413 and 400281 ), Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and Tasmania and Cancer Foundation of Western Australia (Multi-State Applications 191, 211 and 182). AOCS gratefully acknowledges additional support from Ovarian Cancer Australia and the Peter MacCallum Foundation ; CON: National Institutes of Health ( R01-CA063678 , R01-CA074850 ; R01-CA080742 ); DOV: National Institutes of Health R01-CA112523 and R01-CA87538 ; GER: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research , Programme of Clinical Biomedical Research ( 01 GB 9401 ) and the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); HAW: U.S. National Institutes of Health ( R01-CA58598 , N01-CN-55424 and N01-PC-67001 ); HOP: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Dean's Faculty Advancement Award (F. Modugno), Department of Defense ( DAMD17-02-1-0669 ) and NCI ( K07-CA080668 , R01-CA95023 , P50-CA159981 , MO1-RR000056 , R01-CA126841 ); MAL: Funding for this study was provided by research grant R01- CA61107 from the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD , research grant 94 222 52 from the Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark ; and the Mermaid I project ; MAY: National Institutes of Health ( R01-CA122443 , P30-CA15083 , P50-CA136393 ); Mayo Foundation ; Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance ; Fred C. and Katherine B. Andersen Foundation ; NEC: National Institutes of Health R01-CA54419 and P50-CA105009 and Department of Defense W81XWH-10-1-02802; NJO: National Cancer Institute ( NIH-K07 CA095666 , R01-CA83918 , NIH-K22-CA138563 , and P30-CA072720 ) and the Cancer Institute of New Jersey ; OPL: National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia ( APP1025142 , APP1120431 ) and Brisbane Women's Club ; POL: Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute ; UCI: NIH R01-CA058860 and the Lon V Smith Foundation grant LVS-39420 ; UKO: The UKOPS study was funded by The Eve Appeal (The Oak Foundation) with investigators supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre and MRC Core Funding ( MR_UU_12023 ); USC: P01CA17054, P30CA14089, R01CA61132, N01PC67010, R03CA113148, R03CA115195, N01CN025403, and California Cancer Research Program ( 00-01389V-20170 , 2II0200 ). Funding Information: OCAC funding : The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium is supported by a grant from the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund thanks to donations by the family and friends of Kathryn Sladek Smith ( PPD/RPCI.07 ). Funding Information: We are grateful to the family and friends of Kathryn Sladek Smith for their generous support of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium through their donations to the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund. We thank the study participants, doctors, nurses, clinical and scientific collaborators, health care providers and health information sources who have contributed to the many studies contributing to this manuscript. Funding Information: OCAC funding: The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium is supported by a grant from the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund thanks to donations by the family and friends of Kathryn Sladek Smith (PPD/RPCI.07).Funding for individual studies: AUS: The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS) was supported by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (DAMD17-01-1-0729), National Health & Medical Research Council of Australia (199600, 400413 and 400281), Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and Tasmania and Cancer Foundation of Western Australia (Multi-State Applications 191, 211 and 182). AOCS gratefully acknowledges additional support from Ovarian Cancer Australia and the Peter MacCallum Foundation; CON: National Institutes of Health (R01-CA063678, R01-CA074850; R01-CA080742); DOV: National Institutes of Health R01-CA112523 and R01-CA87538; GER: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Programme of Clinical Biomedical Research (01 GB 9401) and the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); HAW: U.S. National Institutes of Health (R01-CA58598, N01-CN-55424 and N01-PC-67001); HOP: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Dean's Faculty Advancement Award (F. Modugno), Department of Defense (DAMD17-02-1-0669) and NCI (K07-CA080668, R01-CA95023, P50-CA159981, MO1-RR000056, R01-CA126841); MAL: Funding for this study was provided by research grant R01- CA61107 from the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, research grant 94 222 52 from the Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark; and the Mermaid I project; MAY: National Institutes of Health (R01-CA122443, P30-CA15083, P50-CA136393); Mayo Foundation; Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance; Fred C. and Katherine B. Andersen Foundation; NEC: National Institutes of Health R01-CA54419 and P50-CA105009 and Department of Defense W81XWH-10-1-02802; NJO: National Cancer Institute (NIH-K07 CA095666, R01-CA83918, NIH-K22-CA138563, and P30-CA072720) and the Cancer Institute of New Jersey; OPL: National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (APP1025142, APP1120431) and Brisbane Women's Club; POL: Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute; UCI: NIH R01-CA058860 and the Lon V Smith Foundation grant LVS-39420; UKO: The UKOPS study was funded by The Eve Appeal (The Oak Foundation) with investigators supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre and MRC Core Funding (MR_UU_12023); USC: P01CA17054, P30CA14089, R01CA61132, N01PC67010, R03CA113148, R03CA115195, N01CN025403, and California Cancer Research Program (00-01389V-20170, 2II0200). Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - Purpose: Prior studies of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and ovarian cancer survival have been limited by lack of hormone regimen detail and insufficient sample sizes. To address these limitations, a comprehensive analysis of 6419 post-menopausal women with pathologically confirmed ovarian carcinoma was conducted to examine the association between MHT use prior to diagnosis and survival. Methods: Data from 15 studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium were included. MHT use was examined by type (estrogen-only (ET) or estrogen+progestin (EPT)), duration, and recency of use relative to diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between hormone therapy use and survival. Logistic regression and mediation analysis was used to explore the relationship between MHT use and residual disease following debulking surgery. Results: Use of ET or EPT for at least five years prior to diagnosis was associated with better ovarian cancer survival (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.87). Among women with advanced stage, high-grade serous carcinoma, those who used MHT were less likely to have any macroscopic residual disease at the time of primary debulking surgery (p for trend <0.01 for duration of MHT use). Residual disease mediated some (17%) of the relationship between MHT and survival. Conclusions: Pre-diagnosis MHT use for 5+ years was a favorable prognostic factor for women with ovarian cancer. This large study is consistent with prior smaller studies, and further work is needed to understand the underlying mechanism.
AB - Purpose: Prior studies of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and ovarian cancer survival have been limited by lack of hormone regimen detail and insufficient sample sizes. To address these limitations, a comprehensive analysis of 6419 post-menopausal women with pathologically confirmed ovarian carcinoma was conducted to examine the association between MHT use prior to diagnosis and survival. Methods: Data from 15 studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium were included. MHT use was examined by type (estrogen-only (ET) or estrogen+progestin (EPT)), duration, and recency of use relative to diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between hormone therapy use and survival. Logistic regression and mediation analysis was used to explore the relationship between MHT use and residual disease following debulking surgery. Results: Use of ET or EPT for at least five years prior to diagnosis was associated with better ovarian cancer survival (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.87). Among women with advanced stage, high-grade serous carcinoma, those who used MHT were less likely to have any macroscopic residual disease at the time of primary debulking surgery (p for trend <0.01 for duration of MHT use). Residual disease mediated some (17%) of the relationship between MHT and survival. Conclusions: Pre-diagnosis MHT use for 5+ years was a favorable prognostic factor for women with ovarian cancer. This large study is consistent with prior smaller studies, and further work is needed to understand the underlying mechanism.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087517386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087517386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.481
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.481
M3 - Article
C2 - 32641237
AN - SCOPUS:85087517386
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 158
SP - 702
EP - 709
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 3
ER -