Meld and Peld: Application of survival models to liver allocation

Russell H. Wiesner, Sue V. McDiarmid, Patrick Sequeira Kamath, Eric B. Edwards, Michael Malinchoc, Walter K Kremers, R. A F Krom, W. Ray Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

661 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Compared to the CTP score (Table 9), the MELD and PELD models provide the means to more accurately measure liver disease severity and to better predict which patients are at risk of dying on the waiting list. The relation between the MELD score and the risk of 3-month mortality is shown in Fig. 7. Most importantly, by de-emphasizing waiting time these two models will allow organ allocation based on medical urgency, as mandated in the DHHS final rule. However, while the MELD score is an extremely powerful predictor of the probability of death in patients with chronic liver disease, it does not address one of the guidelines in the final rule, that an organ allocation system should promote the most efficient use of scarce donor resources and should avoid futile transplants. Thus, a future challenge will be to modify the MELD model in order to predict the probability of death with and without a liver transplant and thus to allow further optimization of the timing of this life-saving procedure. Finally, ongoing studies are needed to further define when the severity of liver disease of a patient has deteriorated to the point that the transplant procedure itself becomes futile. Hopefully, ongoing data collection, as mandated by the Final Rule of HHS, can help us address some of these extremely complex and challenging issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)567-580
Number of pages14
JournalLiver Transplantation
Volume7
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Liver Diseases
Transplants
Survival
Liver
United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
Cytidine Triphosphate
Waiting Lists
Chronic Disease
Tissue Donors
Guidelines
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Wiesner, R. H., McDiarmid, S. V., Kamath, P. S., Edwards, E. B., Malinchoc, M., Kremers, W. K., ... Kim, W. R. (2001). Meld and Peld: Application of survival models to liver allocation. Liver Transplantation, 7(7), 567-580. https://doi.org/10.1053/jlts.2001.25879

Meld and Peld : Application of survival models to liver allocation. / Wiesner, Russell H.; McDiarmid, Sue V.; Kamath, Patrick Sequeira; Edwards, Eric B.; Malinchoc, Michael; Kremers, Walter K; Krom, R. A F; Kim, W. Ray.

In: Liver Transplantation, Vol. 7, No. 7, 2001, p. 567-580.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wiesner, RH, McDiarmid, SV, Kamath, PS, Edwards, EB, Malinchoc, M, Kremers, WK, Krom, RAF & Kim, WR 2001, 'Meld and Peld: Application of survival models to liver allocation', Liver Transplantation, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 567-580. https://doi.org/10.1053/jlts.2001.25879
Wiesner, Russell H. ; McDiarmid, Sue V. ; Kamath, Patrick Sequeira ; Edwards, Eric B. ; Malinchoc, Michael ; Kremers, Walter K ; Krom, R. A F ; Kim, W. Ray. / Meld and Peld : Application of survival models to liver allocation. In: Liver Transplantation. 2001 ; Vol. 7, No. 7. pp. 567-580.
@article{c07d842d08624ed5ae8b6e23dcb95a87,
title = "Meld and Peld: Application of survival models to liver allocation",
abstract = "Compared to the CTP score (Table 9), the MELD and PELD models provide the means to more accurately measure liver disease severity and to better predict which patients are at risk of dying on the waiting list. The relation between the MELD score and the risk of 3-month mortality is shown in Fig. 7. Most importantly, by de-emphasizing waiting time these two models will allow organ allocation based on medical urgency, as mandated in the DHHS final rule. However, while the MELD score is an extremely powerful predictor of the probability of death in patients with chronic liver disease, it does not address one of the guidelines in the final rule, that an organ allocation system should promote the most efficient use of scarce donor resources and should avoid futile transplants. Thus, a future challenge will be to modify the MELD model in order to predict the probability of death with and without a liver transplant and thus to allow further optimization of the timing of this life-saving procedure. Finally, ongoing studies are needed to further define when the severity of liver disease of a patient has deteriorated to the point that the transplant procedure itself becomes futile. Hopefully, ongoing data collection, as mandated by the Final Rule of HHS, can help us address some of these extremely complex and challenging issues.",
author = "Wiesner, {Russell H.} and McDiarmid, {Sue V.} and Kamath, {Patrick Sequeira} and Edwards, {Eric B.} and Michael Malinchoc and Kremers, {Walter K} and Krom, {R. A F} and Kim, {W. Ray}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1053/jlts.2001.25879",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "567--580",
journal = "Liver Transplantation",
issn = "1527-6465",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meld and Peld

T2 - Application of survival models to liver allocation

AU - Wiesner, Russell H.

AU - McDiarmid, Sue V.

AU - Kamath, Patrick Sequeira

AU - Edwards, Eric B.

AU - Malinchoc, Michael

AU - Kremers, Walter K

AU - Krom, R. A F

AU - Kim, W. Ray

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Compared to the CTP score (Table 9), the MELD and PELD models provide the means to more accurately measure liver disease severity and to better predict which patients are at risk of dying on the waiting list. The relation between the MELD score and the risk of 3-month mortality is shown in Fig. 7. Most importantly, by de-emphasizing waiting time these two models will allow organ allocation based on medical urgency, as mandated in the DHHS final rule. However, while the MELD score is an extremely powerful predictor of the probability of death in patients with chronic liver disease, it does not address one of the guidelines in the final rule, that an organ allocation system should promote the most efficient use of scarce donor resources and should avoid futile transplants. Thus, a future challenge will be to modify the MELD model in order to predict the probability of death with and without a liver transplant and thus to allow further optimization of the timing of this life-saving procedure. Finally, ongoing studies are needed to further define when the severity of liver disease of a patient has deteriorated to the point that the transplant procedure itself becomes futile. Hopefully, ongoing data collection, as mandated by the Final Rule of HHS, can help us address some of these extremely complex and challenging issues.

AB - Compared to the CTP score (Table 9), the MELD and PELD models provide the means to more accurately measure liver disease severity and to better predict which patients are at risk of dying on the waiting list. The relation between the MELD score and the risk of 3-month mortality is shown in Fig. 7. Most importantly, by de-emphasizing waiting time these two models will allow organ allocation based on medical urgency, as mandated in the DHHS final rule. However, while the MELD score is an extremely powerful predictor of the probability of death in patients with chronic liver disease, it does not address one of the guidelines in the final rule, that an organ allocation system should promote the most efficient use of scarce donor resources and should avoid futile transplants. Thus, a future challenge will be to modify the MELD model in order to predict the probability of death with and without a liver transplant and thus to allow further optimization of the timing of this life-saving procedure. Finally, ongoing studies are needed to further define when the severity of liver disease of a patient has deteriorated to the point that the transplant procedure itself becomes futile. Hopefully, ongoing data collection, as mandated by the Final Rule of HHS, can help us address some of these extremely complex and challenging issues.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034920207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034920207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/jlts.2001.25879

DO - 10.1053/jlts.2001.25879

M3 - Article

C2 - 11460223

AN - SCOPUS:0034920207

VL - 7

SP - 567

EP - 580

JO - Liver Transplantation

JF - Liver Transplantation

SN - 1527-6465

IS - 7

ER -