MELD 3.0: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Updated for the Modern Era

W. Ray Kim, Ajitha Mannalithara, Julie K. Heimbach, Patrick S. Kamath, Sumeet K. Asrani, Scott W. Biggins, Nicholas L. Wood, Sommer E. Gentry, Allison J. Kwong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background & Aims: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) has been established as a reliable indicator of short-term survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. The current version (MELDNa), consisting of the international normalized ratio and serum bilirubin, creatinine, and sodium, has been used to determine organ allocation priorities for liver transplantation in the United States. The objective was to optimize MELD further by taking into account additional variables and updating coefficients with contemporary data. Methods: All candidates registered on the liver transplant wait list in the US national registry from January 2016 through December 2018 were included. Uni- and multivariable Cox models were developed to predict survival up to 90 days after wait list registration. Model fit was tested using the concordance statistic (C-statistic) and reclassification, and the Liver Simulated Allocation Model was used to estimate the impact of replacing MELDNa with the new model. Results: The final multivariable model was characterized by (1) additional variables of female sex and serum albumin, (2) interactions between bilirubin and sodium and between albumin and creatinine, and (3) an upper bound for creatinine at 3.0 mg/dL. The final model (MELD 3.0) had better discrimination than MELDNa (C-statistic, 0.869 vs 0.862; P <.01). Importantly, MELD 3.0 correctly reclassified a net of 8.8% of decedents to a higher MELD tier, affording them a meaningfully higher chance of transplantation, particularly in women. In the Liver Simulated Allocation Model analysis, MELD 3.0 resulted in fewer wait list deaths compared to MELDNa (7788 vs 7850; P =.02). Conclusion: MELD 3.0 affords more accurate mortality prediction in general than MELDNa and addresses determinants of wait list outcomes, including the sex disparity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1887-1895.e4
JournalGastroenterology
Volume161
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Keywords

  • End-Stage Liver Disease
  • Outcome Prediction
  • Wait List Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MELD 3.0: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Updated for the Modern Era'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this