Mechanical testing for three-dimensional motion analysis reliability

Emily Miller, Kenton R Kaufman, Trevor Kingsbury, Erik Wolf, Jason Wilken, Marilynn Wyatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use simple mechanical tests to evaluate the reliability of three-dimensional motion analysis systems and biomechanical models. Three different tests were conducted at four motion analysis laboratories where clinical care and research studies are routinely performed. The laboratories had different motion capture systems, different types and number of cameras, different types and numbers of force plates and different biomechanical models. These mechanical tests evaluated the accuracy of the motion capture system, the integration of the force plate and the motion capture system, and the strength of the biomechanical model used to calculate rotational kinematics. Results of motion capture system accuracy tests showed that, for all labs, the error between the measured and calculated distances between markers was less than 2 mm and 1 ° for marker separations which ranged from 24 mm to 500 mm. Results from the force plate integration tests demonstrated errors in center of pressure calculation of less than 4 mm across all labs, despite varied force plate and motion system configurations. Finally, errors across labs for single joint rotations and for combined rotations at the hip and knee were less than 2 ° at the hip and less than 10 ° at the knee. These results demonstrate that system accuracy and reliability can be obtained allowing the collection of comparable data across different motion analysis laboratories with varying configurations and equipment. This testing is particularly important when multi-center studies are planned in order to assure data consistency across labs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-119
Number of pages4
JournalGait and Posture
Volume50
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Hip
Knee
Systems Integration
Biomechanical Phenomena
Joints
Pressure
Equipment and Supplies
Research

Keywords

  • Gait
  • Motion analysis
  • Motion capture system validation
  • Reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Medicine(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Mechanical testing for three-dimensional motion analysis reliability. / Miller, Emily; Kaufman, Kenton R; Kingsbury, Trevor; Wolf, Erik; Wilken, Jason; Wyatt, Marilynn.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 50, 01.10.2016, p. 116-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, Emily ; Kaufman, Kenton R ; Kingsbury, Trevor ; Wolf, Erik ; Wilken, Jason ; Wyatt, Marilynn. / Mechanical testing for three-dimensional motion analysis reliability. In: Gait and Posture. 2016 ; Vol. 50. pp. 116-119.
@article{a7d6bd4196f44b5ebd96127ab812a19a,
title = "Mechanical testing for three-dimensional motion analysis reliability",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to use simple mechanical tests to evaluate the reliability of three-dimensional motion analysis systems and biomechanical models. Three different tests were conducted at four motion analysis laboratories where clinical care and research studies are routinely performed. The laboratories had different motion capture systems, different types and number of cameras, different types and numbers of force plates and different biomechanical models. These mechanical tests evaluated the accuracy of the motion capture system, the integration of the force plate and the motion capture system, and the strength of the biomechanical model used to calculate rotational kinematics. Results of motion capture system accuracy tests showed that, for all labs, the error between the measured and calculated distances between markers was less than 2 mm and 1 ° for marker separations which ranged from 24 mm to 500 mm. Results from the force plate integration tests demonstrated errors in center of pressure calculation of less than 4 mm across all labs, despite varied force plate and motion system configurations. Finally, errors across labs for single joint rotations and for combined rotations at the hip and knee were less than 2 ° at the hip and less than 10 ° at the knee. These results demonstrate that system accuracy and reliability can be obtained allowing the collection of comparable data across different motion analysis laboratories with varying configurations and equipment. This testing is particularly important when multi-center studies are planned in order to assure data consistency across labs.",
keywords = "Gait, Motion analysis, Motion capture system validation, Reliability",
author = "Emily Miller and Kaufman, {Kenton R} and Trevor Kingsbury and Erik Wolf and Jason Wilken and Marilynn Wyatt",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "116--119",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanical testing for three-dimensional motion analysis reliability

AU - Miller, Emily

AU - Kaufman, Kenton R

AU - Kingsbury, Trevor

AU - Wolf, Erik

AU - Wilken, Jason

AU - Wyatt, Marilynn

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to use simple mechanical tests to evaluate the reliability of three-dimensional motion analysis systems and biomechanical models. Three different tests were conducted at four motion analysis laboratories where clinical care and research studies are routinely performed. The laboratories had different motion capture systems, different types and number of cameras, different types and numbers of force plates and different biomechanical models. These mechanical tests evaluated the accuracy of the motion capture system, the integration of the force plate and the motion capture system, and the strength of the biomechanical model used to calculate rotational kinematics. Results of motion capture system accuracy tests showed that, for all labs, the error between the measured and calculated distances between markers was less than 2 mm and 1 ° for marker separations which ranged from 24 mm to 500 mm. Results from the force plate integration tests demonstrated errors in center of pressure calculation of less than 4 mm across all labs, despite varied force plate and motion system configurations. Finally, errors across labs for single joint rotations and for combined rotations at the hip and knee were less than 2 ° at the hip and less than 10 ° at the knee. These results demonstrate that system accuracy and reliability can be obtained allowing the collection of comparable data across different motion analysis laboratories with varying configurations and equipment. This testing is particularly important when multi-center studies are planned in order to assure data consistency across labs.

AB - The purpose of this study was to use simple mechanical tests to evaluate the reliability of three-dimensional motion analysis systems and biomechanical models. Three different tests were conducted at four motion analysis laboratories where clinical care and research studies are routinely performed. The laboratories had different motion capture systems, different types and number of cameras, different types and numbers of force plates and different biomechanical models. These mechanical tests evaluated the accuracy of the motion capture system, the integration of the force plate and the motion capture system, and the strength of the biomechanical model used to calculate rotational kinematics. Results of motion capture system accuracy tests showed that, for all labs, the error between the measured and calculated distances between markers was less than 2 mm and 1 ° for marker separations which ranged from 24 mm to 500 mm. Results from the force plate integration tests demonstrated errors in center of pressure calculation of less than 4 mm across all labs, despite varied force plate and motion system configurations. Finally, errors across labs for single joint rotations and for combined rotations at the hip and knee were less than 2 ° at the hip and less than 10 ° at the knee. These results demonstrate that system accuracy and reliability can be obtained allowing the collection of comparable data across different motion analysis laboratories with varying configurations and equipment. This testing is particularly important when multi-center studies are planned in order to assure data consistency across labs.

KW - Gait

KW - Motion analysis

KW - Motion capture system validation

KW - Reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984849104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984849104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.017

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 27592076

AN - SCOPUS:84984849104

VL - 50

SP - 116

EP - 119

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

ER -