Mechanical circulatory support and simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation: An outcome analysis

Sandip K. Zalawadiya, Mark Wigger, Thomas Disalvo, Nicholas Haglund, Simon Maltais, Jo Ann Lindenfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Single-donor simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHKT) can significantly improve the survival of those with advanced heart failure and advanced renal insufficiency. Data on pre-transplant use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and outcomes after SHKT are limited and conflicting. Methods Using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry data, we evaluated 749 adults undergoing SHKT after January 1, 2000. Patients were categorized into the following groups according to their type of pre-transplant MCS device: none (n = 568), pulsatile-flow left (n = 28), continuous-flow left (n = 68), temporary (n = 12), biventricular (n = 19), total artificial heart (n = 20), and unknown (n = 34). Regression analyses were performed to assess the association between types of MCS and post-transplant outcomes. Results Pre-transplant MCS was not associated with in-hospital mortality (univariate odds ratio [OR], 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-2.97; p = 0.170) or post-discharge mortality (univariate hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.58-1.47; p = 0.733). Patients supported with pre-transplant temporary MCS devices were more likely to suffer from serious complications (composite of cardiac or non-cardiac surgeries, stroke, any drug-treated infection, and permanent pacemaker; multivariable adjusted OR, 10.0; 95% CI, 2.77-36.0; p < 0.001) after SHKT. Pre-transplant MCS did not increase risk of post-transplant dialysis (multivariable adjusted OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.81-1.75; p = 0.375) or cardiac rejection (univariate OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.34-1.51; p = 0.382), and did not prolong the length of hospital stay (≥ 4 weeks; multivariable adjusted OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.69-1.59; p = 0.832). Post-transplant dialysis status was a major determinant of adverse in-hospital (multivariable adjusted OR, 6.17; 95% CI, 3.14-12.1; p < 0.001) and post-discharge (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.02-2.39; p = 0.041) mortality after SHKT. Conclusions In the current transplant era, survival after SHKT in patients with pre-transplant MCS was equivalent to that of conventional SHKT. Pre-transplant dialysis, and not MCS status, determined the need for post-SHKT dialysis, which in-turn was a major risk factor for in-hospital and long-term mortality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-212
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • heart failure
  • heart-kidney transplantation
  • mechanical circulatory support
  • post-transplant outcome
  • pre-transplant
  • renal insufficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Transplantation

Cite this