Measuring Barrett’s Epithelial Thickness with Volumetric Laser Endomicroscopy as a Biomarker to Guide Treatment

I. J.M. Levink, H. C. Wolfsen, P. D. Siersema, M. B. Wallace, G. J. Tearney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment outcomes vary for unknown reasons. One hypothesis is that variations in Barrett’s epithelial thickness (BET) are associated with reduced RFA efficacy for thicker BET and strictures for thinner BET. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is an imaging modality that acquires high-resolution, depth-resolved images of BE. However, the attenuation of light by tissue and the lack of layering in Barrett’s tissue challenge BET measurements and the study of relationships between thickness and RFA outcomes. We aimed to quantify BET and compared the reliability of standard and contrast-enhanced VLE images. Methods: Baseline VLE scans from BE patients without prior ablative therapy and a Prague (M) length of > 1 cm were obtained from the US VLE Registry. An algorithm was applied to the VLE images to flatten the mucosal surface and enhance the contrast of different esophageal wall layers. Subsequently, BET was measured by two independent VLE readers using both contrast- and non-contrast-enhanced datasets. In order to validate these adjusted images, intra- and interobserver agreements were calculated. Results: VLE scans from fifty-seven patients were included in this study. BET was measured at eight equidistant locations on the selected cross-sectional images at 0.5 cm intervals from the GEJ to the proximal-most extent of BE. The intra-observer coefficients of the two readers for the contrast-enhanced images were 0.818 (95% CI 0.798–0.836) and 0.890 (95% CI 0.878–0.900). The interobserver agreement for the contrast-enhanced images (0.880; 95% CI 0.867–0.891) was significantly better than for the original images (0.778; 95% CI 0.754–0.799). Conclusion: We developed an algorithm that improves VLE visualization of the mucosal layers of the esophageal wall and enables rapid and reliable measurement of BET. Interobserver variability measurements were significantly reduced when using contrast enhancement. Studies are underway to correlate BET with treatment response.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1579-1587
Number of pages9
JournalDigestive diseases and sciences
Volume64
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2019

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Barrett’s esophageal thickness (BET)
  • Barrett’s esophagus (BE)
  • Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
  • Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this