Measurement of surface contact area of the ankle joint

Hideji Kura, Harold B. Kitaoka, Zong Ping Luo, Kai Nan An

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To determine the distribution of contact area of the ankle joint with axial loading and in positions of maximal dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, supination, and pronation. We also tested the effects of extrinsic tendon loading and arch instability. Design. Nine cadaveric feet were studied in the intact condition and following transection of ligaments to create arch instability. Background. Assessment of ankle contact in various joint positions and degrees of instability is difficult to accomplish with conventional methods. Methods. Displacement of the talus rotative to the tibia was measured with a magnetic tracking device and tibiotalar joint contact from proximity calculations of digitized joint surfaces. Results. Contact area did not change significantly from unloaded condition to 667 N load condition in the medial, central, and lateral zones. Central zone contact area decreased in plantar flexion by an average of 324 mm2 (SD, 165 mm2) (P = 0.0004). Medial zone contact area decreased in plantar flexion by a mean of 55 mm2 (SD, 28 mm2) (P = 0.0004), decreased in pronation by an average of 42 mm2 (SD, 36 mm2) (P = 0.0086), and increased in supination by an average of 20 mm2 (SD, 26 mm2) (P = 0.0430). Lateral zone contact decreased in plantar flexion by a mean of 124 mm2 (SD, 57 mm2) (P = 0.0002). Conclusions. In plantar flexion, there was a decrease in contact area. Loading extrinsic tendons to the foot did not significantly increase ankle contact area, but arch instability caused a decrease in central and lateral zone contact area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-370
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Biomechanics
Volume13
Issue number4-5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1998

Fingerprint

Ankle Joint
Pronation
Supination
Joints
Ankle
Tendons
Foot
Talus
Weight-Bearing
Tibia
Ligaments
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Ankle
  • Biomechanics
  • Foot
  • Joint
  • Joint contact
  • Range of motion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Kura, H., Kitaoka, H. B., Luo, Z. P., & An, K. N. (1998). Measurement of surface contact area of the ankle joint. Clinical Biomechanics, 13(4-5), 365-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00011-4

Measurement of surface contact area of the ankle joint. / Kura, Hideji; Kitaoka, Harold B.; Luo, Zong Ping; An, Kai Nan.

In: Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 13, No. 4-5, 06.1998, p. 365-370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kura, H, Kitaoka, HB, Luo, ZP & An, KN 1998, 'Measurement of surface contact area of the ankle joint', Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 13, no. 4-5, pp. 365-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00011-4
Kura, Hideji ; Kitaoka, Harold B. ; Luo, Zong Ping ; An, Kai Nan. / Measurement of surface contact area of the ankle joint. In: Clinical Biomechanics. 1998 ; Vol. 13, No. 4-5. pp. 365-370.
@article{740b10c7f3ad4752a9d5d44f75450b76,
title = "Measurement of surface contact area of the ankle joint",
abstract = "Objective. To determine the distribution of contact area of the ankle joint with axial loading and in positions of maximal dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, supination, and pronation. We also tested the effects of extrinsic tendon loading and arch instability. Design. Nine cadaveric feet were studied in the intact condition and following transection of ligaments to create arch instability. Background. Assessment of ankle contact in various joint positions and degrees of instability is difficult to accomplish with conventional methods. Methods. Displacement of the talus rotative to the tibia was measured with a magnetic tracking device and tibiotalar joint contact from proximity calculations of digitized joint surfaces. Results. Contact area did not change significantly from unloaded condition to 667 N load condition in the medial, central, and lateral zones. Central zone contact area decreased in plantar flexion by an average of 324 mm2 (SD, 165 mm2) (P = 0.0004). Medial zone contact area decreased in plantar flexion by a mean of 55 mm2 (SD, 28 mm2) (P = 0.0004), decreased in pronation by an average of 42 mm2 (SD, 36 mm2) (P = 0.0086), and increased in supination by an average of 20 mm2 (SD, 26 mm2) (P = 0.0430). Lateral zone contact decreased in plantar flexion by a mean of 124 mm2 (SD, 57 mm2) (P = 0.0002). Conclusions. In plantar flexion, there was a decrease in contact area. Loading extrinsic tendons to the foot did not significantly increase ankle contact area, but arch instability caused a decrease in central and lateral zone contact area.",
keywords = "Ankle, Biomechanics, Foot, Joint, Joint contact, Range of motion",
author = "Hideji Kura and Kitaoka, {Harold B.} and Luo, {Zong Ping} and An, {Kai Nan}",
year = "1998",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00011-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "365--370",
journal = "Clinical Biomechanics",
issn = "0268-0033",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4-5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of surface contact area of the ankle joint

AU - Kura, Hideji

AU - Kitaoka, Harold B.

AU - Luo, Zong Ping

AU - An, Kai Nan

PY - 1998/6

Y1 - 1998/6

N2 - Objective. To determine the distribution of contact area of the ankle joint with axial loading and in positions of maximal dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, supination, and pronation. We also tested the effects of extrinsic tendon loading and arch instability. Design. Nine cadaveric feet were studied in the intact condition and following transection of ligaments to create arch instability. Background. Assessment of ankle contact in various joint positions and degrees of instability is difficult to accomplish with conventional methods. Methods. Displacement of the talus rotative to the tibia was measured with a magnetic tracking device and tibiotalar joint contact from proximity calculations of digitized joint surfaces. Results. Contact area did not change significantly from unloaded condition to 667 N load condition in the medial, central, and lateral zones. Central zone contact area decreased in plantar flexion by an average of 324 mm2 (SD, 165 mm2) (P = 0.0004). Medial zone contact area decreased in plantar flexion by a mean of 55 mm2 (SD, 28 mm2) (P = 0.0004), decreased in pronation by an average of 42 mm2 (SD, 36 mm2) (P = 0.0086), and increased in supination by an average of 20 mm2 (SD, 26 mm2) (P = 0.0430). Lateral zone contact decreased in plantar flexion by a mean of 124 mm2 (SD, 57 mm2) (P = 0.0002). Conclusions. In plantar flexion, there was a decrease in contact area. Loading extrinsic tendons to the foot did not significantly increase ankle contact area, but arch instability caused a decrease in central and lateral zone contact area.

AB - Objective. To determine the distribution of contact area of the ankle joint with axial loading and in positions of maximal dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, supination, and pronation. We also tested the effects of extrinsic tendon loading and arch instability. Design. Nine cadaveric feet were studied in the intact condition and following transection of ligaments to create arch instability. Background. Assessment of ankle contact in various joint positions and degrees of instability is difficult to accomplish with conventional methods. Methods. Displacement of the talus rotative to the tibia was measured with a magnetic tracking device and tibiotalar joint contact from proximity calculations of digitized joint surfaces. Results. Contact area did not change significantly from unloaded condition to 667 N load condition in the medial, central, and lateral zones. Central zone contact area decreased in plantar flexion by an average of 324 mm2 (SD, 165 mm2) (P = 0.0004). Medial zone contact area decreased in plantar flexion by a mean of 55 mm2 (SD, 28 mm2) (P = 0.0004), decreased in pronation by an average of 42 mm2 (SD, 36 mm2) (P = 0.0086), and increased in supination by an average of 20 mm2 (SD, 26 mm2) (P = 0.0430). Lateral zone contact decreased in plantar flexion by a mean of 124 mm2 (SD, 57 mm2) (P = 0.0002). Conclusions. In plantar flexion, there was a decrease in contact area. Loading extrinsic tendons to the foot did not significantly increase ankle contact area, but arch instability caused a decrease in central and lateral zone contact area.

KW - Ankle

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Foot

KW - Joint

KW - Joint contact

KW - Range of motion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032102406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032102406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00011-4

DO - 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00011-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032102406

VL - 13

SP - 365

EP - 370

JO - Clinical Biomechanics

JF - Clinical Biomechanics

SN - 0268-0033

IS - 4-5

ER -