Measurement of myocardium at risk by technetium-99m sestamibi: Correlation with coronary angiography

Kenneth C. Huber, John F. Bresnahan, Dennis R. Bresnahan, Patricia Pellikka, Thomas Behrenbeck, Raymond J Gibbons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that tomographic perfusion imaging with technetium-99m sestamibi (RP-30A) can accurately measure the myocardium at risk during acute myocardial infarction. The ability of coronary angiography to predict the wide variability in myocardium at risk was studied in 21 patients with their first acute myocardial infarction. In blinded fashion, two experienced angiographers provided an overall "best estimate" of the percent of left ventricular myocardium at risk considering multiple angiographic variables-infarct-related artery, location of stenosis (proximal or nonproximal), vessel diameter, length, territory and the number and size of proximal branches and collateral vessels. Many of these individual variables showed a significant association with myocardium at risk. The most important angiographic variable was the mean best estimate of the two angiographers (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001). However, the SEE was large (8.6% of the left ventricle) and angiography significantly (p < 0.002) overestimated myocardium at risk. When patients with an anterior or an inferior infarct were considered separately, the angiographic best estimate had a weaker correlation with myocardium at risk measured by technetium-99m sestamibi in patients in both groups (anterior infarction r = 0.65, p = 0.04; inferior infarction r = 0.65, p = 0.04. Seven patients with an inferior infarct and myocardium at risk ranging from 7% to 32% of the left ventricle had identical angiographic best estimates. Although angiographic estimates correlate closely with measurements of myocardium at risk in groups of patients, their ability to predict the myocardium at risk in individual patients is limited.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-73
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi
Coronary Angiography
Myocardium
Infarction
Heart Ventricles
Myocardial Infarction
Perfusion Imaging
Angiography
Pathologic Constriction
Arteries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Measurement of myocardium at risk by technetium-99m sestamibi : Correlation with coronary angiography. / Huber, Kenneth C.; Bresnahan, John F.; Bresnahan, Dennis R.; Pellikka, Patricia; Behrenbeck, Thomas; Gibbons, Raymond J.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1992, p. 67-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huber, Kenneth C. ; Bresnahan, John F. ; Bresnahan, Dennis R. ; Pellikka, Patricia ; Behrenbeck, Thomas ; Gibbons, Raymond J. / Measurement of myocardium at risk by technetium-99m sestamibi : Correlation with coronary angiography. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1992 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 67-73.
@article{8d3b133c7c284088b2c92db772a6e2e7,
title = "Measurement of myocardium at risk by technetium-99m sestamibi: Correlation with coronary angiography",
abstract = "Previous studies have shown that tomographic perfusion imaging with technetium-99m sestamibi (RP-30A) can accurately measure the myocardium at risk during acute myocardial infarction. The ability of coronary angiography to predict the wide variability in myocardium at risk was studied in 21 patients with their first acute myocardial infarction. In blinded fashion, two experienced angiographers provided an overall {"}best estimate{"} of the percent of left ventricular myocardium at risk considering multiple angiographic variables-infarct-related artery, location of stenosis (proximal or nonproximal), vessel diameter, length, territory and the number and size of proximal branches and collateral vessels. Many of these individual variables showed a significant association with myocardium at risk. The most important angiographic variable was the mean best estimate of the two angiographers (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001). However, the SEE was large (8.6{\%} of the left ventricle) and angiography significantly (p < 0.002) overestimated myocardium at risk. When patients with an anterior or an inferior infarct were considered separately, the angiographic best estimate had a weaker correlation with myocardium at risk measured by technetium-99m sestamibi in patients in both groups (anterior infarction r = 0.65, p = 0.04; inferior infarction r = 0.65, p = 0.04. Seven patients with an inferior infarct and myocardium at risk ranging from 7{\%} to 32{\%} of the left ventricle had identical angiographic best estimates. Although angiographic estimates correlate closely with measurements of myocardium at risk in groups of patients, their ability to predict the myocardium at risk in individual patients is limited.",
author = "Huber, {Kenneth C.} and Bresnahan, {John F.} and Bresnahan, {Dennis R.} and Patricia Pellikka and Thomas Behrenbeck and Gibbons, {Raymond J}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1016/0735-1097(92)90053-P",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "67--73",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of myocardium at risk by technetium-99m sestamibi

T2 - Correlation with coronary angiography

AU - Huber, Kenneth C.

AU - Bresnahan, John F.

AU - Bresnahan, Dennis R.

AU - Pellikka, Patricia

AU - Behrenbeck, Thomas

AU - Gibbons, Raymond J

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Previous studies have shown that tomographic perfusion imaging with technetium-99m sestamibi (RP-30A) can accurately measure the myocardium at risk during acute myocardial infarction. The ability of coronary angiography to predict the wide variability in myocardium at risk was studied in 21 patients with their first acute myocardial infarction. In blinded fashion, two experienced angiographers provided an overall "best estimate" of the percent of left ventricular myocardium at risk considering multiple angiographic variables-infarct-related artery, location of stenosis (proximal or nonproximal), vessel diameter, length, territory and the number and size of proximal branches and collateral vessels. Many of these individual variables showed a significant association with myocardium at risk. The most important angiographic variable was the mean best estimate of the two angiographers (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001). However, the SEE was large (8.6% of the left ventricle) and angiography significantly (p < 0.002) overestimated myocardium at risk. When patients with an anterior or an inferior infarct were considered separately, the angiographic best estimate had a weaker correlation with myocardium at risk measured by technetium-99m sestamibi in patients in both groups (anterior infarction r = 0.65, p = 0.04; inferior infarction r = 0.65, p = 0.04. Seven patients with an inferior infarct and myocardium at risk ranging from 7% to 32% of the left ventricle had identical angiographic best estimates. Although angiographic estimates correlate closely with measurements of myocardium at risk in groups of patients, their ability to predict the myocardium at risk in individual patients is limited.

AB - Previous studies have shown that tomographic perfusion imaging with technetium-99m sestamibi (RP-30A) can accurately measure the myocardium at risk during acute myocardial infarction. The ability of coronary angiography to predict the wide variability in myocardium at risk was studied in 21 patients with their first acute myocardial infarction. In blinded fashion, two experienced angiographers provided an overall "best estimate" of the percent of left ventricular myocardium at risk considering multiple angiographic variables-infarct-related artery, location of stenosis (proximal or nonproximal), vessel diameter, length, territory and the number and size of proximal branches and collateral vessels. Many of these individual variables showed a significant association with myocardium at risk. The most important angiographic variable was the mean best estimate of the two angiographers (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001). However, the SEE was large (8.6% of the left ventricle) and angiography significantly (p < 0.002) overestimated myocardium at risk. When patients with an anterior or an inferior infarct were considered separately, the angiographic best estimate had a weaker correlation with myocardium at risk measured by technetium-99m sestamibi in patients in both groups (anterior infarction r = 0.65, p = 0.04; inferior infarction r = 0.65, p = 0.04. Seven patients with an inferior infarct and myocardium at risk ranging from 7% to 32% of the left ventricle had identical angiographic best estimates. Although angiographic estimates correlate closely with measurements of myocardium at risk in groups of patients, their ability to predict the myocardium at risk in individual patients is limited.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026595531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026595531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90053-P

DO - 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90053-P

M3 - Article

C2 - 1530856

AN - SCOPUS:0026595531

VL - 19

SP - 67

EP - 73

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 1

ER -