Meaningful conversations in living with and treating chronic conditions: Development of the ICAN discussion aid

Kasey R. Boehmer, Ian G. Hargraves, Summer Allen, Marc R. Matthews, Christina Maher, Victor Manuel Montori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The needs of the growing population of complex patients with multiple chronic conditions calls for a different approach to care. Clinical teams need to acknowledge, respect, and support the work that patients do and the capacity they mobilize to enact this work, and to adapt and self-manage. Tools that enable this approach to care are needed. Methods: Using user-centered design principles, we set out to create a discussion aid for use by patients, clinicians, and other health professionals during clinical encounters. We observed clinical encounters, visited patient homes, and dialogued with patient support groups. We then developed and tested prototypes in routine clinical practice. Then we refined a final prototype with extensive stakeholder feedback. Results: From this process resulted the ICAN Discussion Aid, a tool completed by the patient and reviewed during the consultation in which patients classified domains that contribute to capacity as sources of burden or satisfaction; clinical demands were also classified as sources of help or burden. The clinical review facilitated by ICAN generates hypotheses regarding why some treatment plans may be problematic and may not be enacted in the patient's situation. Conclusion: We successfully created a discussion aid to elucidate and share insights about the capacity patients have to enact the treatment plan and hypotheses as to why this plan may or may not be enacted. Next steps involve the evaluation of the impact of the ICAN Discussion Aid on clinical encounters with a variety of health professionals and the impact of ICAN-informed treatment plans on patient-important outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number514
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 23 2016

Fingerprint

Self-Help Groups
Health
Therapeutics
Referral and Consultation
Population
Multiple Chronic Conditions

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Minimally disruptive medicine
  • Multiple chronic conditions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Meaningful conversations in living with and treating chronic conditions : Development of the ICAN discussion aid. / Boehmer, Kasey R.; Hargraves, Ian G.; Allen, Summer; Matthews, Marc R.; Maher, Christina; Montori, Victor Manuel.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, 514, 23.09.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd2a17f936da4139bec3b432475b666e,
title = "Meaningful conversations in living with and treating chronic conditions: Development of the ICAN discussion aid",
abstract = "Background: The needs of the growing population of complex patients with multiple chronic conditions calls for a different approach to care. Clinical teams need to acknowledge, respect, and support the work that patients do and the capacity they mobilize to enact this work, and to adapt and self-manage. Tools that enable this approach to care are needed. Methods: Using user-centered design principles, we set out to create a discussion aid for use by patients, clinicians, and other health professionals during clinical encounters. We observed clinical encounters, visited patient homes, and dialogued with patient support groups. We then developed and tested prototypes in routine clinical practice. Then we refined a final prototype with extensive stakeholder feedback. Results: From this process resulted the ICAN Discussion Aid, a tool completed by the patient and reviewed during the consultation in which patients classified domains that contribute to capacity as sources of burden or satisfaction; clinical demands were also classified as sources of help or burden. The clinical review facilitated by ICAN generates hypotheses regarding why some treatment plans may be problematic and may not be enacted in the patient's situation. Conclusion: We successfully created a discussion aid to elucidate and share insights about the capacity patients have to enact the treatment plan and hypotheses as to why this plan may or may not be enacted. Next steps involve the evaluation of the impact of the ICAN Discussion Aid on clinical encounters with a variety of health professionals and the impact of ICAN-informed treatment plans on patient-important outcomes.",
keywords = "Communication, Minimally disruptive medicine, Multiple chronic conditions",
author = "Boehmer, {Kasey R.} and Hargraves, {Ian G.} and Summer Allen and Matthews, {Marc R.} and Christina Maher and Montori, {Victor Manuel}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1186/s12913-016-1742-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meaningful conversations in living with and treating chronic conditions

T2 - Development of the ICAN discussion aid

AU - Boehmer, Kasey R.

AU - Hargraves, Ian G.

AU - Allen, Summer

AU - Matthews, Marc R.

AU - Maher, Christina

AU - Montori, Victor Manuel

PY - 2016/9/23

Y1 - 2016/9/23

N2 - Background: The needs of the growing population of complex patients with multiple chronic conditions calls for a different approach to care. Clinical teams need to acknowledge, respect, and support the work that patients do and the capacity they mobilize to enact this work, and to adapt and self-manage. Tools that enable this approach to care are needed. Methods: Using user-centered design principles, we set out to create a discussion aid for use by patients, clinicians, and other health professionals during clinical encounters. We observed clinical encounters, visited patient homes, and dialogued with patient support groups. We then developed and tested prototypes in routine clinical practice. Then we refined a final prototype with extensive stakeholder feedback. Results: From this process resulted the ICAN Discussion Aid, a tool completed by the patient and reviewed during the consultation in which patients classified domains that contribute to capacity as sources of burden or satisfaction; clinical demands were also classified as sources of help or burden. The clinical review facilitated by ICAN generates hypotheses regarding why some treatment plans may be problematic and may not be enacted in the patient's situation. Conclusion: We successfully created a discussion aid to elucidate and share insights about the capacity patients have to enact the treatment plan and hypotheses as to why this plan may or may not be enacted. Next steps involve the evaluation of the impact of the ICAN Discussion Aid on clinical encounters with a variety of health professionals and the impact of ICAN-informed treatment plans on patient-important outcomes.

AB - Background: The needs of the growing population of complex patients with multiple chronic conditions calls for a different approach to care. Clinical teams need to acknowledge, respect, and support the work that patients do and the capacity they mobilize to enact this work, and to adapt and self-manage. Tools that enable this approach to care are needed. Methods: Using user-centered design principles, we set out to create a discussion aid for use by patients, clinicians, and other health professionals during clinical encounters. We observed clinical encounters, visited patient homes, and dialogued with patient support groups. We then developed and tested prototypes in routine clinical practice. Then we refined a final prototype with extensive stakeholder feedback. Results: From this process resulted the ICAN Discussion Aid, a tool completed by the patient and reviewed during the consultation in which patients classified domains that contribute to capacity as sources of burden or satisfaction; clinical demands were also classified as sources of help or burden. The clinical review facilitated by ICAN generates hypotheses regarding why some treatment plans may be problematic and may not be enacted in the patient's situation. Conclusion: We successfully created a discussion aid to elucidate and share insights about the capacity patients have to enact the treatment plan and hypotheses as to why this plan may or may not be enacted. Next steps involve the evaluation of the impact of the ICAN Discussion Aid on clinical encounters with a variety of health professionals and the impact of ICAN-informed treatment plans on patient-important outcomes.

KW - Communication

KW - Minimally disruptive medicine

KW - Multiple chronic conditions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992715413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992715413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12913-016-1742-6

DO - 10.1186/s12913-016-1742-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84992715413

VL - 16

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

IS - 1

M1 - 514

ER -