Marked central canal T2-hyperintensity in MOGAD myelitis and comparison to NMOSD and MS

Lauren M. Webb, Laura Cacciaguerra, Karl N. Krecke, John J. Chen, Elia Sechi, Vyanka Redenbaugh, Divyanshu Dubey, Sean J. Pittock, Eoin P. Flanagan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To assess marked central canal T2-hyperintensity in patients with myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) myelitis compared to myelitis patients with aquaporin-4-antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4 + NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS). Material/methods: Two blinded raters evaluated spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) of myelitis patients with MOGAD (n = 63), AQP4 + NMOSD (n = 37), and MS (n = 26), assessing for marked central canal T2-hyperintensity and its evolution. If there were conflicting results, a third neurologist assessed the MRI. Results: Marked central canal T2-hyperintensity was more frequent in patients with MOGAD (18/63[29%]) than MS (1/26[4%]; p = 0.01) myelitis but did not differ from AQP4 + NMOSD (13/37[35%]; p = 0.49). Marked central canal T2-hyperintensity had completely resolved on follow-up axial MRI for most MOGAD (12/14[86%]) and AQP4 + NMOSD (10/10[100%]; p = 0.49) patients. Conclusions: Marked central canal T2-hyperintensity is a common transient radiologic accompaniment of MOGAD and AQP4 + NMOSD myelitis, but not MS myelitis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number120687
JournalJournal of the neurological sciences
Volume450
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2023

Keywords

  • Bright spotty
  • Central canal
  • MOG
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder
  • myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein
  • myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Marked central canal T2-hyperintensity in MOGAD myelitis and comparison to NMOSD and MS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this