Mammographic density, parity and age at first birth, and risk of breast cancer: An analysis of four case-control studies

Christy G. Woolcott, Karin Koga, Shannon M. Conroy, Celia Byrne, Chisato Nagata, Giske Ursin, Celine M Vachon, Martin J. Yaffe, Ian Pagano, Gertraud Maskarinec

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mammographic density is strongly and consistently associated with breast cancer risk. To determine if this association was modified by reproductive factors (parity and age at first birth), data were combined from four case-control studies conducted in the United States and Japan. To overcome the issue of variation in mammographic density assessment among the studies, a single observer re-read all the mammograms using one type of interactive thresholding software. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) while adjusting for other known breast cancer risk factors. Included were 1,699 breast cancer cases and 2,422 controls, 74% of whom were postmenopausal. A positive association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk was evident in every group defined by parity and age at first birth (OR per doubling of percent mammographic density ranged between 1.20 and 1.39). Nonetheless, the association appeared to be stronger among nulliparous than parous women (OR per doublingofpercent mammographic density = 1.39 vs. 1.24; P interaction = 0.054). However, when examined by study location, the effect modification by parity was apparent only in women from Hawaii and when examined by menopausal status, it was apparent in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, women. Effect modification by parity was not significant in subgroups defined by body mass index or ethnicity. Adjusting for mammographic density did not attenuate the OR for the association between parity and breast cancer risk by more than 16.4%, suggesting that mammographic density explains only a small proportion of the reduction in breast cancer risk associated with parity. In conclusion, this study did not support the hypothesis that parity modifies the breast cancer risk attributed to mammographic density. Even though an effect modification was found in Hawaiian women, no such thing was found in women from the other three locations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1163-1171
Number of pages9
JournalBreast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume132
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Birth Order
Parity
Case-Control Studies
Breast Neoplasms
Odds Ratio
Breast Density
Age Factors
Japan
Body Mass Index
Software
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • Breast neoplasms
  • Effect modification
  • Epidemiology
  • Mammographic density
  • Reproductive factors
  • Risk factor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Mammographic density, parity and age at first birth, and risk of breast cancer : An analysis of four case-control studies. / Woolcott, Christy G.; Koga, Karin; Conroy, Shannon M.; Byrne, Celia; Nagata, Chisato; Ursin, Giske; Vachon, Celine M; Yaffe, Martin J.; Pagano, Ian; Maskarinec, Gertraud.

In: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Vol. 132, No. 3, 04.2012, p. 1163-1171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Woolcott, CG, Koga, K, Conroy, SM, Byrne, C, Nagata, C, Ursin, G, Vachon, CM, Yaffe, MJ, Pagano, I & Maskarinec, G 2012, 'Mammographic density, parity and age at first birth, and risk of breast cancer: An analysis of four case-control studies', Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 1163-1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1929-9
Woolcott, Christy G. ; Koga, Karin ; Conroy, Shannon M. ; Byrne, Celia ; Nagata, Chisato ; Ursin, Giske ; Vachon, Celine M ; Yaffe, Martin J. ; Pagano, Ian ; Maskarinec, Gertraud. / Mammographic density, parity and age at first birth, and risk of breast cancer : An analysis of four case-control studies. In: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2012 ; Vol. 132, No. 3. pp. 1163-1171.
@article{dfd331be0b6a45a391e9ef1ccdaaac80,
title = "Mammographic density, parity and age at first birth, and risk of breast cancer: An analysis of four case-control studies",
abstract = "Mammographic density is strongly and consistently associated with breast cancer risk. To determine if this association was modified by reproductive factors (parity and age at first birth), data were combined from four case-control studies conducted in the United States and Japan. To overcome the issue of variation in mammographic density assessment among the studies, a single observer re-read all the mammograms using one type of interactive thresholding software. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) while adjusting for other known breast cancer risk factors. Included were 1,699 breast cancer cases and 2,422 controls, 74{\%} of whom were postmenopausal. A positive association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk was evident in every group defined by parity and age at first birth (OR per doubling of percent mammographic density ranged between 1.20 and 1.39). Nonetheless, the association appeared to be stronger among nulliparous than parous women (OR per doublingofpercent mammographic density = 1.39 vs. 1.24; P interaction = 0.054). However, when examined by study location, the effect modification by parity was apparent only in women from Hawaii and when examined by menopausal status, it was apparent in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, women. Effect modification by parity was not significant in subgroups defined by body mass index or ethnicity. Adjusting for mammographic density did not attenuate the OR for the association between parity and breast cancer risk by more than 16.4{\%}, suggesting that mammographic density explains only a small proportion of the reduction in breast cancer risk associated with parity. In conclusion, this study did not support the hypothesis that parity modifies the breast cancer risk attributed to mammographic density. Even though an effect modification was found in Hawaiian women, no such thing was found in women from the other three locations.",
keywords = "Breast neoplasms, Effect modification, Epidemiology, Mammographic density, Reproductive factors, Risk factor",
author = "Woolcott, {Christy G.} and Karin Koga and Conroy, {Shannon M.} and Celia Byrne and Chisato Nagata and Giske Ursin and Vachon, {Celine M} and Yaffe, {Martin J.} and Ian Pagano and Gertraud Maskarinec",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s10549-011-1929-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "132",
pages = "1163--1171",
journal = "Breast Cancer Research and Treatment",
issn = "0167-6806",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mammographic density, parity and age at first birth, and risk of breast cancer

T2 - An analysis of four case-control studies

AU - Woolcott, Christy G.

AU - Koga, Karin

AU - Conroy, Shannon M.

AU - Byrne, Celia

AU - Nagata, Chisato

AU - Ursin, Giske

AU - Vachon, Celine M

AU - Yaffe, Martin J.

AU - Pagano, Ian

AU - Maskarinec, Gertraud

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Mammographic density is strongly and consistently associated with breast cancer risk. To determine if this association was modified by reproductive factors (parity and age at first birth), data were combined from four case-control studies conducted in the United States and Japan. To overcome the issue of variation in mammographic density assessment among the studies, a single observer re-read all the mammograms using one type of interactive thresholding software. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) while adjusting for other known breast cancer risk factors. Included were 1,699 breast cancer cases and 2,422 controls, 74% of whom were postmenopausal. A positive association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk was evident in every group defined by parity and age at first birth (OR per doubling of percent mammographic density ranged between 1.20 and 1.39). Nonetheless, the association appeared to be stronger among nulliparous than parous women (OR per doublingofpercent mammographic density = 1.39 vs. 1.24; P interaction = 0.054). However, when examined by study location, the effect modification by parity was apparent only in women from Hawaii and when examined by menopausal status, it was apparent in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, women. Effect modification by parity was not significant in subgroups defined by body mass index or ethnicity. Adjusting for mammographic density did not attenuate the OR for the association between parity and breast cancer risk by more than 16.4%, suggesting that mammographic density explains only a small proportion of the reduction in breast cancer risk associated with parity. In conclusion, this study did not support the hypothesis that parity modifies the breast cancer risk attributed to mammographic density. Even though an effect modification was found in Hawaiian women, no such thing was found in women from the other three locations.

AB - Mammographic density is strongly and consistently associated with breast cancer risk. To determine if this association was modified by reproductive factors (parity and age at first birth), data were combined from four case-control studies conducted in the United States and Japan. To overcome the issue of variation in mammographic density assessment among the studies, a single observer re-read all the mammograms using one type of interactive thresholding software. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) while adjusting for other known breast cancer risk factors. Included were 1,699 breast cancer cases and 2,422 controls, 74% of whom were postmenopausal. A positive association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk was evident in every group defined by parity and age at first birth (OR per doubling of percent mammographic density ranged between 1.20 and 1.39). Nonetheless, the association appeared to be stronger among nulliparous than parous women (OR per doublingofpercent mammographic density = 1.39 vs. 1.24; P interaction = 0.054). However, when examined by study location, the effect modification by parity was apparent only in women from Hawaii and when examined by menopausal status, it was apparent in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, women. Effect modification by parity was not significant in subgroups defined by body mass index or ethnicity. Adjusting for mammographic density did not attenuate the OR for the association between parity and breast cancer risk by more than 16.4%, suggesting that mammographic density explains only a small proportion of the reduction in breast cancer risk associated with parity. In conclusion, this study did not support the hypothesis that parity modifies the breast cancer risk attributed to mammographic density. Even though an effect modification was found in Hawaiian women, no such thing was found in women from the other three locations.

KW - Breast neoplasms

KW - Effect modification

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Mammographic density

KW - Reproductive factors

KW - Risk factor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865175083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865175083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10549-011-1929-9

DO - 10.1007/s10549-011-1929-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 22222356

AN - SCOPUS:84865175083

VL - 132

SP - 1163

EP - 1171

JO - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

JF - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

SN - 0167-6806

IS - 3

ER -