Major depression and dysthymia in children and adolescents: Discriminant validity and differential consequences in a community sample

Sherryl H. Goodman, Mary Schwab-Stone, Benjamin B. Lahey, David Shaffer, Peter S. Jensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate evidence, in a community sample, for discriminant validity between major depression (MDD) and dysthymia (Dy) in children and adolescents and to examine differential consequences of the 2 disorders for functioning. Method: The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) study consists of probability samples of youths. Data for this study are derived from interviews with 1,285 complete parent-youth pairs aged 9 to 17 years from 4 geographic areas in the United States Youths with MDD were contrasted with those with Dy and those with both (MDD-Dy) on the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Non-Clinician Children's Global Assessment Scale, Columbia Impairment Scale, and the Service Utilization and Risk Factors Module. Results: Groups with MDD, Dy, or MDD-Dy did not differ on sociodemographic, clinical, or family and life event variables. Youths with combined MDD-Dy were significantly less competent and more impaired than youths with either disorder alone. Conclusions: The findings do not provide support for the differentiation of MDD and Dy but strongly suggest the importance of addressing the needs of youths who meet criteria for both MDD and Dy because this combination is likely to be both serious and disruptive of normal developmental processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)761-770
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume39
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Depression
National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Interviews
Sampling Studies
Appointments and Schedules
Epidemiology

Keywords

  • Discriminant validity
  • Dysthymia
  • Impairment
  • Major depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Major depression and dysthymia in children and adolescents : Discriminant validity and differential consequences in a community sample. / Goodman, Sherryl H.; Schwab-Stone, Mary; Lahey, Benjamin B.; Shaffer, David; Jensen, Peter S.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2000, p. 761-770.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goodman, Sherryl H. ; Schwab-Stone, Mary ; Lahey, Benjamin B. ; Shaffer, David ; Jensen, Peter S. / Major depression and dysthymia in children and adolescents : Discriminant validity and differential consequences in a community sample. In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2000 ; Vol. 39, No. 6. pp. 761-770.
@article{31254537fc0b46828df434b2221accda,
title = "Major depression and dysthymia in children and adolescents: Discriminant validity and differential consequences in a community sample",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate evidence, in a community sample, for discriminant validity between major depression (MDD) and dysthymia (Dy) in children and adolescents and to examine differential consequences of the 2 disorders for functioning. Method: The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) study consists of probability samples of youths. Data for this study are derived from interviews with 1,285 complete parent-youth pairs aged 9 to 17 years from 4 geographic areas in the United States Youths with MDD were contrasted with those with Dy and those with both (MDD-Dy) on the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Non-Clinician Children's Global Assessment Scale, Columbia Impairment Scale, and the Service Utilization and Risk Factors Module. Results: Groups with MDD, Dy, or MDD-Dy did not differ on sociodemographic, clinical, or family and life event variables. Youths with combined MDD-Dy were significantly less competent and more impaired than youths with either disorder alone. Conclusions: The findings do not provide support for the differentiation of MDD and Dy but strongly suggest the importance of addressing the needs of youths who meet criteria for both MDD and Dy because this combination is likely to be both serious and disruptive of normal developmental processes.",
keywords = "Discriminant validity, Dysthymia, Impairment, Major depression",
author = "Goodman, {Sherryl H.} and Mary Schwab-Stone and Lahey, {Benjamin B.} and David Shaffer and Jensen, {Peter S.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "761--770",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry",
issn = "0890-8567",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Major depression and dysthymia in children and adolescents

T2 - Discriminant validity and differential consequences in a community sample

AU - Goodman, Sherryl H.

AU - Schwab-Stone, Mary

AU - Lahey, Benjamin B.

AU - Shaffer, David

AU - Jensen, Peter S.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate evidence, in a community sample, for discriminant validity between major depression (MDD) and dysthymia (Dy) in children and adolescents and to examine differential consequences of the 2 disorders for functioning. Method: The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) study consists of probability samples of youths. Data for this study are derived from interviews with 1,285 complete parent-youth pairs aged 9 to 17 years from 4 geographic areas in the United States Youths with MDD were contrasted with those with Dy and those with both (MDD-Dy) on the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Non-Clinician Children's Global Assessment Scale, Columbia Impairment Scale, and the Service Utilization and Risk Factors Module. Results: Groups with MDD, Dy, or MDD-Dy did not differ on sociodemographic, clinical, or family and life event variables. Youths with combined MDD-Dy were significantly less competent and more impaired than youths with either disorder alone. Conclusions: The findings do not provide support for the differentiation of MDD and Dy but strongly suggest the importance of addressing the needs of youths who meet criteria for both MDD and Dy because this combination is likely to be both serious and disruptive of normal developmental processes.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate evidence, in a community sample, for discriminant validity between major depression (MDD) and dysthymia (Dy) in children and adolescents and to examine differential consequences of the 2 disorders for functioning. Method: The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) study consists of probability samples of youths. Data for this study are derived from interviews with 1,285 complete parent-youth pairs aged 9 to 17 years from 4 geographic areas in the United States Youths with MDD were contrasted with those with Dy and those with both (MDD-Dy) on the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Non-Clinician Children's Global Assessment Scale, Columbia Impairment Scale, and the Service Utilization and Risk Factors Module. Results: Groups with MDD, Dy, or MDD-Dy did not differ on sociodemographic, clinical, or family and life event variables. Youths with combined MDD-Dy were significantly less competent and more impaired than youths with either disorder alone. Conclusions: The findings do not provide support for the differentiation of MDD and Dy but strongly suggest the importance of addressing the needs of youths who meet criteria for both MDD and Dy because this combination is likely to be both serious and disruptive of normal developmental processes.

KW - Discriminant validity

KW - Dysthymia

KW - Impairment

KW - Major depression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034075364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034075364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10846311

AN - SCOPUS:0034075364

VL - 39

SP - 761

EP - 770

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

SN - 0890-8567

IS - 6

ER -