Mail surveys resulted in more reports of substance use than telephone surveys

Timothy J. Beebe, James A. McRae, Patricia A. Harrison, Michael E. Davern, Kathryn B. Quinlan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine to what extent the substance-use information obtained in surveys is affected by method of data collection. Study Design and Setting: Questions on the use of alcohol and drugs were administered to samples of Minnesota adults assigned to one of two conditions to test the effect of mode of administration (mail and telephone); 816 persons completed the survey, roughly one half by mail and one half by telephone. Results: Those interviewed by telephone revealed more heavy use of alcohol, but the mail sample includes disproportionate numbers of respondents from demographic groups that exhibit less use. Controlling for these differences across modes, as well as the differential use of listed telephone numbers and addresses, reduces the effect of mode on one measure of heavy alcohol use to nonsignificance but yields significant effects of mode on others. Specifically, those in the mail condition reported higher levels of illicit drug use in the last year, alcohol use in the last month, and heavy alcohol use in the last 2 weeks. Conclusions: The greater, and arguably more accurate, reporting of substance use, coupled with potential cost savings, suggests that researchers should consider using mail surveys for investigating substance use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)421-424
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume58
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005

Fingerprint

Postal Service
Telephone
Alcohols
Cost Savings
Street Drugs
Research Personnel
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • Mail surveys
  • Method of questionnaire administration
  • Mode effects
  • Substance use
  • Telephone surveys

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Beebe, T. J., McRae, J. A., Harrison, P. A., Davern, M. E., & Quinlan, K. B. (2005). Mail surveys resulted in more reports of substance use than telephone surveys. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(4), 421-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.007

Mail surveys resulted in more reports of substance use than telephone surveys. / Beebe, Timothy J.; McRae, James A.; Harrison, Patricia A.; Davern, Michael E.; Quinlan, Kathryn B.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 58, No. 4, 04.2005, p. 421-424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beebe, Timothy J. ; McRae, James A. ; Harrison, Patricia A. ; Davern, Michael E. ; Quinlan, Kathryn B. / Mail surveys resulted in more reports of substance use than telephone surveys. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2005 ; Vol. 58, No. 4. pp. 421-424.
@article{333b3200d2fe4daa891637a50fde8ba0,
title = "Mail surveys resulted in more reports of substance use than telephone surveys",
abstract = "Objective: To determine to what extent the substance-use information obtained in surveys is affected by method of data collection. Study Design and Setting: Questions on the use of alcohol and drugs were administered to samples of Minnesota adults assigned to one of two conditions to test the effect of mode of administration (mail and telephone); 816 persons completed the survey, roughly one half by mail and one half by telephone. Results: Those interviewed by telephone revealed more heavy use of alcohol, but the mail sample includes disproportionate numbers of respondents from demographic groups that exhibit less use. Controlling for these differences across modes, as well as the differential use of listed telephone numbers and addresses, reduces the effect of mode on one measure of heavy alcohol use to nonsignificance but yields significant effects of mode on others. Specifically, those in the mail condition reported higher levels of illicit drug use in the last year, alcohol use in the last month, and heavy alcohol use in the last 2 weeks. Conclusions: The greater, and arguably more accurate, reporting of substance use, coupled with potential cost savings, suggests that researchers should consider using mail surveys for investigating substance use.",
keywords = "Mail surveys, Method of questionnaire administration, Mode effects, Substance use, Telephone surveys",
author = "Beebe, {Timothy J.} and McRae, {James A.} and Harrison, {Patricia A.} and Davern, {Michael E.} and Quinlan, {Kathryn B.}",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "421--424",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mail surveys resulted in more reports of substance use than telephone surveys

AU - Beebe, Timothy J.

AU - McRae, James A.

AU - Harrison, Patricia A.

AU - Davern, Michael E.

AU - Quinlan, Kathryn B.

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - Objective: To determine to what extent the substance-use information obtained in surveys is affected by method of data collection. Study Design and Setting: Questions on the use of alcohol and drugs were administered to samples of Minnesota adults assigned to one of two conditions to test the effect of mode of administration (mail and telephone); 816 persons completed the survey, roughly one half by mail and one half by telephone. Results: Those interviewed by telephone revealed more heavy use of alcohol, but the mail sample includes disproportionate numbers of respondents from demographic groups that exhibit less use. Controlling for these differences across modes, as well as the differential use of listed telephone numbers and addresses, reduces the effect of mode on one measure of heavy alcohol use to nonsignificance but yields significant effects of mode on others. Specifically, those in the mail condition reported higher levels of illicit drug use in the last year, alcohol use in the last month, and heavy alcohol use in the last 2 weeks. Conclusions: The greater, and arguably more accurate, reporting of substance use, coupled with potential cost savings, suggests that researchers should consider using mail surveys for investigating substance use.

AB - Objective: To determine to what extent the substance-use information obtained in surveys is affected by method of data collection. Study Design and Setting: Questions on the use of alcohol and drugs were administered to samples of Minnesota adults assigned to one of two conditions to test the effect of mode of administration (mail and telephone); 816 persons completed the survey, roughly one half by mail and one half by telephone. Results: Those interviewed by telephone revealed more heavy use of alcohol, but the mail sample includes disproportionate numbers of respondents from demographic groups that exhibit less use. Controlling for these differences across modes, as well as the differential use of listed telephone numbers and addresses, reduces the effect of mode on one measure of heavy alcohol use to nonsignificance but yields significant effects of mode on others. Specifically, those in the mail condition reported higher levels of illicit drug use in the last year, alcohol use in the last month, and heavy alcohol use in the last 2 weeks. Conclusions: The greater, and arguably more accurate, reporting of substance use, coupled with potential cost savings, suggests that researchers should consider using mail surveys for investigating substance use.

KW - Mail surveys

KW - Method of questionnaire administration

KW - Mode effects

KW - Substance use

KW - Telephone surveys

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18044367986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18044367986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 15868697

AN - SCOPUS:18044367986

VL - 58

SP - 421

EP - 424

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 4

ER -