Magnetic resonance angiography of the hand and wrist: Evaluation of patients with severe ischemic disease

Mark J. Kransdorf, Sharon Turner-Stepahin, Wyndell H. Merritt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conventional arteriography is considered the standard for the evaluation of patients with severe ischemic disease of the hand and wrist. Magnetic resonance (MR) has been shown to be a reliable non-invasive alternative to conventional arteriography. The authors prospectively evaluated this technology in 11 patients with Raynaud's syndrome and severe ischemic disease of the upper extremity. MR angiograms were compared with results from surgery in seven cases and conventional arteriography in four cases. There was excellent correlation between MR angiography and the results of surgery and conventional arteriography. In all cases, MR correctly predicted the patency or lack of patency of the distal and ulnar arteries, and superficial and deep palmar arches. In three cases, portions of the palmar arches oriented parallel to the plane were not adequately seen. Common and proper digital arteries were incompletely seen with both conventional and MR angiography. MR angiography is a reliable noninvasive method to evaluate patients with severe upper-extremity ischemic disease, accurately depicting the peripheral vessels through the level of the palmar arches. Anatomic vascular depiction is adequate for determination of patency of the major vessels for preoperative evaluation for reconstructive surgery and sympathectomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)77-81
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Volume14
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Wrist
Angiography
Hand
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Upper Extremity
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Ulnar Artery
Sympathectomy
Blood Vessels
Arteries
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Magnetic resonance angiography of the hand and wrist : Evaluation of patients with severe ischemic disease. / Kransdorf, Mark J.; Turner-Stepahin, Sharon; Merritt, Wyndell H.

In: Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Vol. 14, No. 2, 02.1998, p. 77-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kransdorf, Mark J. ; Turner-Stepahin, Sharon ; Merritt, Wyndell H. / Magnetic resonance angiography of the hand and wrist : Evaluation of patients with severe ischemic disease. In: Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. 1998 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 77-81.
@article{3bc0fb24a1e848169b327b019435aaa9,
title = "Magnetic resonance angiography of the hand and wrist: Evaluation of patients with severe ischemic disease",
abstract = "Conventional arteriography is considered the standard for the evaluation of patients with severe ischemic disease of the hand and wrist. Magnetic resonance (MR) has been shown to be a reliable non-invasive alternative to conventional arteriography. The authors prospectively evaluated this technology in 11 patients with Raynaud's syndrome and severe ischemic disease of the upper extremity. MR angiograms were compared with results from surgery in seven cases and conventional arteriography in four cases. There was excellent correlation between MR angiography and the results of surgery and conventional arteriography. In all cases, MR correctly predicted the patency or lack of patency of the distal and ulnar arteries, and superficial and deep palmar arches. In three cases, portions of the palmar arches oriented parallel to the plane were not adequately seen. Common and proper digital arteries were incompletely seen with both conventional and MR angiography. MR angiography is a reliable noninvasive method to evaluate patients with severe upper-extremity ischemic disease, accurately depicting the peripheral vessels through the level of the palmar arches. Anatomic vascular depiction is adequate for determination of patency of the major vessels for preoperative evaluation for reconstructive surgery and sympathectomy.",
author = "Kransdorf, {Mark J.} and Sharon Turner-Stepahin and Merritt, {Wyndell H.}",
year = "1998",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "77--81",
journal = "Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery",
issn = "0743-684X",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnetic resonance angiography of the hand and wrist

T2 - Evaluation of patients with severe ischemic disease

AU - Kransdorf, Mark J.

AU - Turner-Stepahin, Sharon

AU - Merritt, Wyndell H.

PY - 1998/2

Y1 - 1998/2

N2 - Conventional arteriography is considered the standard for the evaluation of patients with severe ischemic disease of the hand and wrist. Magnetic resonance (MR) has been shown to be a reliable non-invasive alternative to conventional arteriography. The authors prospectively evaluated this technology in 11 patients with Raynaud's syndrome and severe ischemic disease of the upper extremity. MR angiograms were compared with results from surgery in seven cases and conventional arteriography in four cases. There was excellent correlation between MR angiography and the results of surgery and conventional arteriography. In all cases, MR correctly predicted the patency or lack of patency of the distal and ulnar arteries, and superficial and deep palmar arches. In three cases, portions of the palmar arches oriented parallel to the plane were not adequately seen. Common and proper digital arteries were incompletely seen with both conventional and MR angiography. MR angiography is a reliable noninvasive method to evaluate patients with severe upper-extremity ischemic disease, accurately depicting the peripheral vessels through the level of the palmar arches. Anatomic vascular depiction is adequate for determination of patency of the major vessels for preoperative evaluation for reconstructive surgery and sympathectomy.

AB - Conventional arteriography is considered the standard for the evaluation of patients with severe ischemic disease of the hand and wrist. Magnetic resonance (MR) has been shown to be a reliable non-invasive alternative to conventional arteriography. The authors prospectively evaluated this technology in 11 patients with Raynaud's syndrome and severe ischemic disease of the upper extremity. MR angiograms were compared with results from surgery in seven cases and conventional arteriography in four cases. There was excellent correlation between MR angiography and the results of surgery and conventional arteriography. In all cases, MR correctly predicted the patency or lack of patency of the distal and ulnar arteries, and superficial and deep palmar arches. In three cases, portions of the palmar arches oriented parallel to the plane were not adequately seen. Common and proper digital arteries were incompletely seen with both conventional and MR angiography. MR angiography is a reliable noninvasive method to evaluate patients with severe upper-extremity ischemic disease, accurately depicting the peripheral vessels through the level of the palmar arches. Anatomic vascular depiction is adequate for determination of patency of the major vessels for preoperative evaluation for reconstructive surgery and sympathectomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031955622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031955622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9524324

AN - SCOPUS:0031955622

VL - 14

SP - 77

EP - 81

JO - Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery

JF - Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery

SN - 0743-684X

IS - 2

ER -