Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk

Celine M Vachon, V. Shane Pankratz, Christopher G. Scott, Shaun D. Maloney, Karthik Ghosh, Kathleen R Brandt, Tia Milanese, Michael J. Carston, Thomas A. Sellers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. However, whether changes in mammographic density are associated with risk remains unclear. Materials and Methods: A study of 372 incident breast cancer cases and 713 matched controls was conducted within the Mayo Clinic mammography screening practice. Controls were matched on age, exam date, residence, menopause, interval between, and number of mammograms. All serial craniocaudal mammograms 10 years before ascertainment were digitized, and quantitative measures of percent density (PD) were estimated using a thresholding method. Data on potential confounders were abstracted from medical records. Logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the interactions among PD at earliest mammogram, time from earliest to each serial mammogram, and absolute change in PD between the earliest and subsequent mammograms. Analyses were done separately for PD measures from the ipsilateral and contralateral breast and also by use of hormone therapy (HT). Results: Subjects had an average of five mammograms available, were primarily postmenopausal (83%), and averaged 61 years at the earliest mammogram. Mean PD at earliest mammogram was higher for cases (31%) than controls (27%; ipsilateral side). There was no evidence of an association between change in PD and breast cancer risk by time. Compared with no change, an overall reduction of 10% PD (lowest quartile of change) was associated with an odds ratio of 0.9997 and an increase of 6.5% PD (highest quartile of change) with an odds ratio of 1.002. The same results held within the group of 220 cases and 340 controls never using HT. Among the 124 cases and 337 controls known to use HT during the interval, there was a statistically significant interaction between change in PD and time since the earliest mammogram (P = 0.01). However, in all groups, the risk associated with the earliest PD remained a stronger predictor of risk than change in PD. Conclusion: We observed no association between change in PD with breast cancer risk among all women and those never using HT. However, the interaction between change in PD and time should be evaluated in other populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)921-928
Number of pages8
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

Breast Neoplasms
Hormones
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Mammography
Therapeutics
Menopause
Medical Records
Breast
Breast Density
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk. / Vachon, Celine M; Pankratz, V. Shane; Scott, Christopher G.; Maloney, Shaun D.; Ghosh, Karthik; Brandt, Kathleen R; Milanese, Tia; Carston, Michael J.; Sellers, Thomas A.

In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, Vol. 16, No. 5, 05.2007, p. 921-928.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vachon, Celine M ; Pankratz, V. Shane ; Scott, Christopher G. ; Maloney, Shaun D. ; Ghosh, Karthik ; Brandt, Kathleen R ; Milanese, Tia ; Carston, Michael J. ; Sellers, Thomas A. / Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk. In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2007 ; Vol. 16, No. 5. pp. 921-928.
@article{fb8064f594cc4b8fa8cbdc877f6b1e1e,
title = "Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk",
abstract = "Background: Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. However, whether changes in mammographic density are associated with risk remains unclear. Materials and Methods: A study of 372 incident breast cancer cases and 713 matched controls was conducted within the Mayo Clinic mammography screening practice. Controls were matched on age, exam date, residence, menopause, interval between, and number of mammograms. All serial craniocaudal mammograms 10 years before ascertainment were digitized, and quantitative measures of percent density (PD) were estimated using a thresholding method. Data on potential confounders were abstracted from medical records. Logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the interactions among PD at earliest mammogram, time from earliest to each serial mammogram, and absolute change in PD between the earliest and subsequent mammograms. Analyses were done separately for PD measures from the ipsilateral and contralateral breast and also by use of hormone therapy (HT). Results: Subjects had an average of five mammograms available, were primarily postmenopausal (83{\%}), and averaged 61 years at the earliest mammogram. Mean PD at earliest mammogram was higher for cases (31{\%}) than controls (27{\%}; ipsilateral side). There was no evidence of an association between change in PD and breast cancer risk by time. Compared with no change, an overall reduction of 10{\%} PD (lowest quartile of change) was associated with an odds ratio of 0.9997 and an increase of 6.5{\%} PD (highest quartile of change) with an odds ratio of 1.002. The same results held within the group of 220 cases and 340 controls never using HT. Among the 124 cases and 337 controls known to use HT during the interval, there was a statistically significant interaction between change in PD and time since the earliest mammogram (P = 0.01). However, in all groups, the risk associated with the earliest PD remained a stronger predictor of risk than change in PD. Conclusion: We observed no association between change in PD with breast cancer risk among all women and those never using HT. However, the interaction between change in PD and time should be evaluated in other populations.",
author = "Vachon, {Celine M} and Pankratz, {V. Shane} and Scott, {Christopher G.} and Maloney, {Shaun D.} and Karthik Ghosh and Brandt, {Kathleen R} and Tia Milanese and Carston, {Michael J.} and Sellers, {Thomas A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-1047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "921--928",
journal = "Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention",
issn = "1055-9965",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk

AU - Vachon, Celine M

AU - Pankratz, V. Shane

AU - Scott, Christopher G.

AU - Maloney, Shaun D.

AU - Ghosh, Karthik

AU - Brandt, Kathleen R

AU - Milanese, Tia

AU - Carston, Michael J.

AU - Sellers, Thomas A.

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Background: Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. However, whether changes in mammographic density are associated with risk remains unclear. Materials and Methods: A study of 372 incident breast cancer cases and 713 matched controls was conducted within the Mayo Clinic mammography screening practice. Controls were matched on age, exam date, residence, menopause, interval between, and number of mammograms. All serial craniocaudal mammograms 10 years before ascertainment were digitized, and quantitative measures of percent density (PD) were estimated using a thresholding method. Data on potential confounders were abstracted from medical records. Logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the interactions among PD at earliest mammogram, time from earliest to each serial mammogram, and absolute change in PD between the earliest and subsequent mammograms. Analyses were done separately for PD measures from the ipsilateral and contralateral breast and also by use of hormone therapy (HT). Results: Subjects had an average of five mammograms available, were primarily postmenopausal (83%), and averaged 61 years at the earliest mammogram. Mean PD at earliest mammogram was higher for cases (31%) than controls (27%; ipsilateral side). There was no evidence of an association between change in PD and breast cancer risk by time. Compared with no change, an overall reduction of 10% PD (lowest quartile of change) was associated with an odds ratio of 0.9997 and an increase of 6.5% PD (highest quartile of change) with an odds ratio of 1.002. The same results held within the group of 220 cases and 340 controls never using HT. Among the 124 cases and 337 controls known to use HT during the interval, there was a statistically significant interaction between change in PD and time since the earliest mammogram (P = 0.01). However, in all groups, the risk associated with the earliest PD remained a stronger predictor of risk than change in PD. Conclusion: We observed no association between change in PD with breast cancer risk among all women and those never using HT. However, the interaction between change in PD and time should be evaluated in other populations.

AB - Background: Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. However, whether changes in mammographic density are associated with risk remains unclear. Materials and Methods: A study of 372 incident breast cancer cases and 713 matched controls was conducted within the Mayo Clinic mammography screening practice. Controls were matched on age, exam date, residence, menopause, interval between, and number of mammograms. All serial craniocaudal mammograms 10 years before ascertainment were digitized, and quantitative measures of percent density (PD) were estimated using a thresholding method. Data on potential confounders were abstracted from medical records. Logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the interactions among PD at earliest mammogram, time from earliest to each serial mammogram, and absolute change in PD between the earliest and subsequent mammograms. Analyses were done separately for PD measures from the ipsilateral and contralateral breast and also by use of hormone therapy (HT). Results: Subjects had an average of five mammograms available, were primarily postmenopausal (83%), and averaged 61 years at the earliest mammogram. Mean PD at earliest mammogram was higher for cases (31%) than controls (27%; ipsilateral side). There was no evidence of an association between change in PD and breast cancer risk by time. Compared with no change, an overall reduction of 10% PD (lowest quartile of change) was associated with an odds ratio of 0.9997 and an increase of 6.5% PD (highest quartile of change) with an odds ratio of 1.002. The same results held within the group of 220 cases and 340 controls never using HT. Among the 124 cases and 337 controls known to use HT during the interval, there was a statistically significant interaction between change in PD and time since the earliest mammogram (P = 0.01). However, in all groups, the risk associated with the earliest PD remained a stronger predictor of risk than change in PD. Conclusion: We observed no association between change in PD with breast cancer risk among all women and those never using HT. However, the interaction between change in PD and time should be evaluated in other populations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250366942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250366942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-1047

DO - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-1047

M3 - Article

C2 - 17507617

AN - SCOPUS:34250366942

VL - 16

SP - 921

EP - 928

JO - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

JF - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

SN - 1055-9965

IS - 5

ER -