Longevity of sprint fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads and risk factors for failure: Implications for patient management

Robert G. Hauser, William H. Maisel, Paul A. Friedman, Linda M. Kallinen, Andrew S. Mugglin, Kapil Kumar, David O. Hodge, Thomas B. Morrison, David L. Hayes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

104 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background- Sprint Fidelis (Fidelis) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads are prone to fractures that have caused adverse events, primarily inappropriate shocks, and a few reported deaths. More than 100 000 patients have Fidelis leads. No independent multicenter long-term performance information exists for this lead, and single-center studies suggest that certain patients are at increased risk for Fidelis failure. Our aim was to assess the longevity of Fidelis leads and to evaluate clinical variables and adverse events associated with Fidelis failure. The results were compared with like data for Quattro Secure (Quattro) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads implanted at our centers. Methods and Results- This 3-center study included adults 18 years of age who received Fidelis or Quattro leads for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. From November 2001 to January 2009,1023 Fidelis and 1668 Quattro leads were implanted and followed up. The failure rate for Fidelis leads was 2.81%/y compared with 0.43%/y for Quattro leads (P<0.0001). No deaths or injuries occurred as a result of lead failure, but 42% of fractures caused inappropriate shocks. The survival of Fidelis leads at 4 years was 87.0% (95% confidence interval, 83.6 to 90.1) compared with 98.7% (95% confidence interval, 97.9 to 99.4) for Quattro leads (P<0.0001). Multivariate predictors of Fidelis failure were younger age (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 0.99), female gender (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 1.00), and cardiac disease (P=0.041). Conclusions- Compared with Quattro leads, the survival of Fidelis leads continues to decline, and Fidelis failure is notably higher in younger patients, women, individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia or channelopathies. These findings have significant implications for the management of patients who have Fidelis leads, and they demonstrate the importance of weighing clinical variables in assessments of implantable cardioverter- defibrillator lead performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)358-363
Number of pages6
JournalCirculation
Volume123
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011

Keywords

  • cardiomyopathy hypertrophic
  • channelopathies
  • implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Longevity of sprint fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads and risk factors for failure: Implications for patient management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Hauser, R. G., Maisel, W. H., Friedman, P. A., Kallinen, L. M., Mugglin, A. S., Kumar, K., Hodge, D. O., Morrison, T. B., & Hayes, D. L. (2011). Longevity of sprint fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads and risk factors for failure: Implications for patient management. Circulation, 123(4), 358-363. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.975219