Long-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair

Juliane Bingener, Lauren Buck, Melanie Richards, Joel Michalek, Wayne Schwesinger, Kenneth Sirinek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether there was a difference in morbidity, recurrence rate, and length of hospital stay between patients undergoing open or laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Design and Setting: Single-institution cohort study. We compared prospectively collected patient cohorts undergoing laparoscopic or open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. Statistical analysis was performed by Fisher exact test and analysis of variance. Patients: Between October 1995 and December 2005, data from 360 consecutive patients who had undergone open or laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair of a ventral hernia were prospectively collected in a database and were supplemented by record review. Main Outcome Measures: Morbidity, hernia recurrence, and length of hospital stay. Postoperative complications of Clavien grade II or greater were considered major complications. Results: Intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair was performed in 233 patients by the open approach and in 127 patients using the laparoscopic approach. The groups were similar for sex and body mass index (calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared); the mean age of the laparoscopic group was 3 years younger; and the mesh was larger in the laparoscopic group. Mean follow-up was 30 and 36 months for the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively; the conversion rate was 4%. Major morbidities were 15% in the open group vs 7% in the laparoscopic group (P=.01). Recurrence rates were 9% in the open group vs 12% in the laparoscopic group (P=.36). Postoperative inpatient admission was more frequent after the open procedure than after the laparoscopic procedure (28% vs 16%, respectively; P<05). Conclusions: Outcomes did not differ with respect to recurrence rates after long-term follow-up; however, the lower rate of major morbidity and increased outpatient-based procedure rates favor laparoscopic repair in this study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)562-566
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume142
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ventral Hernia
Herniorrhaphy
Inlays
Length of Stay
Morbidity
Recurrence
Hernia
Inpatients
Analysis of Variance
Body Mass Index
Cohort Studies
Outpatients
Age Groups
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Weights and Measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Bingener, J., Buck, L., Richards, M., Michalek, J., Schwesinger, W., & Sirinek, K. (2007). Long-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair. Archives of Surgery, 142(6), 562-566. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.142.6.562

Long-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair. / Bingener, Juliane; Buck, Lauren; Richards, Melanie; Michalek, Joel; Schwesinger, Wayne; Sirinek, Kenneth.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 142, No. 6, 06.2007, p. 562-566.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bingener, J, Buck, L, Richards, M, Michalek, J, Schwesinger, W & Sirinek, K 2007, 'Long-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair', Archives of Surgery, vol. 142, no. 6, pp. 562-566. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.142.6.562
Bingener J, Buck L, Richards M, Michalek J, Schwesinger W, Sirinek K. Long-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair. Archives of Surgery. 2007 Jun;142(6):562-566. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.142.6.562
Bingener, Juliane ; Buck, Lauren ; Richards, Melanie ; Michalek, Joel ; Schwesinger, Wayne ; Sirinek, Kenneth. / Long-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair. In: Archives of Surgery. 2007 ; Vol. 142, No. 6. pp. 562-566.
@article{faa4868cc71e4387819cc2c4f6fc2728,
title = "Long-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate whether there was a difference in morbidity, recurrence rate, and length of hospital stay between patients undergoing open or laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Design and Setting: Single-institution cohort study. We compared prospectively collected patient cohorts undergoing laparoscopic or open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. Statistical analysis was performed by Fisher exact test and analysis of variance. Patients: Between October 1995 and December 2005, data from 360 consecutive patients who had undergone open or laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair of a ventral hernia were prospectively collected in a database and were supplemented by record review. Main Outcome Measures: Morbidity, hernia recurrence, and length of hospital stay. Postoperative complications of Clavien grade II or greater were considered major complications. Results: Intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair was performed in 233 patients by the open approach and in 127 patients using the laparoscopic approach. The groups were similar for sex and body mass index (calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared); the mean age of the laparoscopic group was 3 years younger; and the mesh was larger in the laparoscopic group. Mean follow-up was 30 and 36 months for the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively; the conversion rate was 4{\%}. Major morbidities were 15{\%} in the open group vs 7{\%} in the laparoscopic group (P=.01). Recurrence rates were 9{\%} in the open group vs 12{\%} in the laparoscopic group (P=.36). Postoperative inpatient admission was more frequent after the open procedure than after the laparoscopic procedure (28{\%} vs 16{\%}, respectively; P<05). Conclusions: Outcomes did not differ with respect to recurrence rates after long-term follow-up; however, the lower rate of major morbidity and increased outpatient-based procedure rates favor laparoscopic repair in this study.",
author = "Juliane Bingener and Lauren Buck and Melanie Richards and Joel Michalek and Wayne Schwesinger and Kenneth Sirinek",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.142.6.562",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "562--566",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair

AU - Bingener, Juliane

AU - Buck, Lauren

AU - Richards, Melanie

AU - Michalek, Joel

AU - Schwesinger, Wayne

AU - Sirinek, Kenneth

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Objective: To investigate whether there was a difference in morbidity, recurrence rate, and length of hospital stay between patients undergoing open or laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Design and Setting: Single-institution cohort study. We compared prospectively collected patient cohorts undergoing laparoscopic or open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. Statistical analysis was performed by Fisher exact test and analysis of variance. Patients: Between October 1995 and December 2005, data from 360 consecutive patients who had undergone open or laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair of a ventral hernia were prospectively collected in a database and were supplemented by record review. Main Outcome Measures: Morbidity, hernia recurrence, and length of hospital stay. Postoperative complications of Clavien grade II or greater were considered major complications. Results: Intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair was performed in 233 patients by the open approach and in 127 patients using the laparoscopic approach. The groups were similar for sex and body mass index (calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared); the mean age of the laparoscopic group was 3 years younger; and the mesh was larger in the laparoscopic group. Mean follow-up was 30 and 36 months for the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively; the conversion rate was 4%. Major morbidities were 15% in the open group vs 7% in the laparoscopic group (P=.01). Recurrence rates were 9% in the open group vs 12% in the laparoscopic group (P=.36). Postoperative inpatient admission was more frequent after the open procedure than after the laparoscopic procedure (28% vs 16%, respectively; P<05). Conclusions: Outcomes did not differ with respect to recurrence rates after long-term follow-up; however, the lower rate of major morbidity and increased outpatient-based procedure rates favor laparoscopic repair in this study.

AB - Objective: To investigate whether there was a difference in morbidity, recurrence rate, and length of hospital stay between patients undergoing open or laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Design and Setting: Single-institution cohort study. We compared prospectively collected patient cohorts undergoing laparoscopic or open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. Statistical analysis was performed by Fisher exact test and analysis of variance. Patients: Between October 1995 and December 2005, data from 360 consecutive patients who had undergone open or laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair of a ventral hernia were prospectively collected in a database and were supplemented by record review. Main Outcome Measures: Morbidity, hernia recurrence, and length of hospital stay. Postoperative complications of Clavien grade II or greater were considered major complications. Results: Intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair was performed in 233 patients by the open approach and in 127 patients using the laparoscopic approach. The groups were similar for sex and body mass index (calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared); the mean age of the laparoscopic group was 3 years younger; and the mesh was larger in the laparoscopic group. Mean follow-up was 30 and 36 months for the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively; the conversion rate was 4%. Major morbidities were 15% in the open group vs 7% in the laparoscopic group (P=.01). Recurrence rates were 9% in the open group vs 12% in the laparoscopic group (P=.36). Postoperative inpatient admission was more frequent after the open procedure than after the laparoscopic procedure (28% vs 16%, respectively; P<05). Conclusions: Outcomes did not differ with respect to recurrence rates after long-term follow-up; however, the lower rate of major morbidity and increased outpatient-based procedure rates favor laparoscopic repair in this study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250692050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250692050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.142.6.562

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.142.6.562

M3 - Article

VL - 142

SP - 562

EP - 566

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 6

ER -