Liability and Informed Consent in the Context of Shared Decision Making

Rachel A. Lindor, Marleen Kunneman, Matt Hanzel, Jeremiah D. Schuur, Victor Manuel Montori, Annie T. Sadosty, Manish N. Shah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The idea of shared decision making (SDM) is gaining traction within emergency medicine, although concerns about potential legal consequences of its use may be slowing its adoption. We describe the similarities and differences between informed consent (IC) requirements and SDM, highlighting their different purposes, scope, and implementation. We also illustrate several areas in which SDM may affect clinicians’ liability risks and suggest that while SDM is likely to reduce net liability risks, it may increase providers’ liability risks in certain situations or with select patients. Overall, engaging in SDM should be understood as clearly distinct from the process of obtaining IC and could reduce clinicians’ risk of liability when applied carefully and thoughtfully.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1428-1433
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume23
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Informed Consent
Decision Making
Emergency Medicine
Traction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Lindor, R. A., Kunneman, M., Hanzel, M., Schuur, J. D., Montori, V. M., Sadosty, A. T., & Shah, M. N. (2016). Liability and Informed Consent in the Context of Shared Decision Making. Academic Emergency Medicine, 23(12), 1428-1433. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13078

Liability and Informed Consent in the Context of Shared Decision Making. / Lindor, Rachel A.; Kunneman, Marleen; Hanzel, Matt; Schuur, Jeremiah D.; Montori, Victor Manuel; Sadosty, Annie T.; Shah, Manish N.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 12, 01.12.2016, p. 1428-1433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lindor, RA, Kunneman, M, Hanzel, M, Schuur, JD, Montori, VM, Sadosty, AT & Shah, MN 2016, 'Liability and Informed Consent in the Context of Shared Decision Making', Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1428-1433. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13078
Lindor, Rachel A. ; Kunneman, Marleen ; Hanzel, Matt ; Schuur, Jeremiah D. ; Montori, Victor Manuel ; Sadosty, Annie T. ; Shah, Manish N. / Liability and Informed Consent in the Context of Shared Decision Making. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 23, No. 12. pp. 1428-1433.
@article{e730febe88de4381a98d9e124b791547,
title = "Liability and Informed Consent in the Context of Shared Decision Making",
abstract = "The idea of shared decision making (SDM) is gaining traction within emergency medicine, although concerns about potential legal consequences of its use may be slowing its adoption. We describe the similarities and differences between informed consent (IC) requirements and SDM, highlighting their different purposes, scope, and implementation. We also illustrate several areas in which SDM may affect clinicians’ liability risks and suggest that while SDM is likely to reduce net liability risks, it may increase providers’ liability risks in certain situations or with select patients. Overall, engaging in SDM should be understood as clearly distinct from the process of obtaining IC and could reduce clinicians’ risk of liability when applied carefully and thoughtfully.",
author = "Lindor, {Rachel A.} and Marleen Kunneman and Matt Hanzel and Schuur, {Jeremiah D.} and Montori, {Victor Manuel} and Sadosty, {Annie T.} and Shah, {Manish N.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/acem.13078",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "1428--1433",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liability and Informed Consent in the Context of Shared Decision Making

AU - Lindor, Rachel A.

AU - Kunneman, Marleen

AU - Hanzel, Matt

AU - Schuur, Jeremiah D.

AU - Montori, Victor Manuel

AU - Sadosty, Annie T.

AU - Shah, Manish N.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - The idea of shared decision making (SDM) is gaining traction within emergency medicine, although concerns about potential legal consequences of its use may be slowing its adoption. We describe the similarities and differences between informed consent (IC) requirements and SDM, highlighting their different purposes, scope, and implementation. We also illustrate several areas in which SDM may affect clinicians’ liability risks and suggest that while SDM is likely to reduce net liability risks, it may increase providers’ liability risks in certain situations or with select patients. Overall, engaging in SDM should be understood as clearly distinct from the process of obtaining IC and could reduce clinicians’ risk of liability when applied carefully and thoughtfully.

AB - The idea of shared decision making (SDM) is gaining traction within emergency medicine, although concerns about potential legal consequences of its use may be slowing its adoption. We describe the similarities and differences between informed consent (IC) requirements and SDM, highlighting their different purposes, scope, and implementation. We also illustrate several areas in which SDM may affect clinicians’ liability risks and suggest that while SDM is likely to reduce net liability risks, it may increase providers’ liability risks in certain situations or with select patients. Overall, engaging in SDM should be understood as clearly distinct from the process of obtaining IC and could reduce clinicians’ risk of liability when applied carefully and thoughtfully.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002376201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002376201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/acem.13078

DO - 10.1111/acem.13078

M3 - Article

C2 - 27607573

AN - SCOPUS:85002376201

VL - 23

SP - 1428

EP - 1433

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 12

ER -