Liability and Informed Consent in the Context of Shared Decision Making

Rachel A. Lindor, Marleen Kunneman, Matt Hanzel, Jeremiah D. Schuur, Victor M. Montori, Annie T. Sadosty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations


The idea of shared decision making (SDM) is gaining traction within emergency medicine, although concerns about potential legal consequences of its use may be slowing its adoption. We describe the similarities and differences between informed consent (IC) requirements and SDM, highlighting their different purposes, scope, and implementation. We also illustrate several areas in which SDM may affect clinicians’ liability risks and suggest that while SDM is likely to reduce net liability risks, it may increase providers’ liability risks in certain situations or with select patients. Overall, engaging in SDM should be understood as clearly distinct from the process of obtaining IC and could reduce clinicians’ risk of liability when applied carefully and thoughtfully.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1428-1433
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Liability and Informed Consent in the Context of Shared Decision Making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this