Learning curves for transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER-I trial: Technical performance, success, and safety

Rakesh M. Suri, Sa'ar Minha, Oluseun Alli, Ron Waksman, Charanjit S. Rihal, Lowell P. Satler, Kevin L. Greason, Rebecca Torguson, Augusto D. Pichard, Michael Mack, Lars G. Svensson, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, Ashley M. Lowry, John Ehrlinger, Stephanie L. Mick, E. Murat Tuzcu, Vinod H. Thourani, Raj Makkar, David Holmes, Martin B. LeonEugene H. Blackstone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives Introduction of hybrid techniques, such as transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TA-TAVR), requires skills that a heart team must master to achieve technical efficiency: the technical performance learning curve. To date, the learning curve for TA-TAVR remains unknown. We therefore evaluated the rate at which technical performance improved, assessed change in occurrence of adverse events in relation to technical performance, and determined whether adverse events after TA-TAVR were linked to acquiring technical performance efficiency (the learning curve). Methods From April 2007 to February 2012, 1100 patients, average age 85.0 ± 6.4 years, underwent TA-TAVR in the PARTNER-I trial. Learning curves were defined by institution-specific patient sequence number using nonlinear mixed modeling. Results Mean procedure time decreased from 131 to 116 minutes within 30 cases (P = .06) and device success increased to 90% by case 45 (P = .0007). Within 30 days, 354 patients experienced a major adverse event (stroke in 29, death in 96), with possibly decreased complications over time (P ∼ .08). Although longer procedure time was associated with more adverse events (P < .0001), these events were associated with change in patient risk profile, not the technical performance learning curve (P = .8). Conclusions The learning curve for TA-TAVR was 30 to 45 procedures performed, and technical efficiency was achieved without compromising patient safety. Although fewer patients are now undergoing TAVR via nontransfemoral access, understanding TA-TAVR learning curves and their relationship with outcomes is important as the field moves toward next-generation devices, such as those to replace the mitral valve, delivered via the left ventricular apex.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)773-780.e14
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume152
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Keywords

  • learning curve
  • safety
  • success
  • technical performance
  • transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Learning curves for transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER-I trial: Technical performance, success, and safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Suri, R. M., Minha, S., Alli, O., Waksman, R., Rihal, C. S., Satler, L. P., Greason, K. L., Torguson, R., Pichard, A. D., Mack, M., Svensson, L. G., Rajeswaran, J., Lowry, A. M., Ehrlinger, J., Mick, S. L., Tuzcu, E. M., Thourani, V. H., Makkar, R., Holmes, D., ... Blackstone, E. H. (2016). Learning curves for transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER-I trial: Technical performance, success, and safety. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 152(3), 773-780.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.04.028