Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: The need for trials

T. M. Young-fadok, R. Talac, Heidi Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Laparoscopic approaches are increasingly being applied to colorectal surgical procedures. This is particularly true of benign disease indications. Colon and rectal cancer is the only intra-abdominal malignancy that is knowingly resected using laparoscopic techniques. Concerns initially existed regarding the magnitude of benefits from the laparoscopic approach. Even as these were being addressed, further concerns arose regarding the appropriateness of this technique in malignancy. This controversy was highlighted by reports of early tumor implants in trocar wounds. With careful technique, training, and experience, however, wound recurrences are rarely seen, suggesting that this phenomenon, in the clinical setting, is primarily technique-related. The ultimate measures of oncological outcomes are 5-year measures of overall survival and disease-free survival. Lack of rigorous evidence either condemning or supporting the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resulted in the establishment of several large-scale randomized prospective trials, all currently in progress, that aim to determine whether laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer results in oncological outcomes comparable with those of the open approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)94-101
Number of pages8
JournalSeminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Volume10
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Colectomy
Colorectal Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Wounds and Injuries
Rectal Neoplasms
Surgical Instruments
Colonic Neoplasms
Disease-Free Survival
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Recurrence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer : The need for trials. / Young-fadok, T. M.; Talac, R.; Nelson, Heidi.

In: Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1999, p. 94-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Young-fadok, T. M. ; Talac, R. ; Nelson, Heidi. / Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer : The need for trials. In: Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 1999 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 94-101.
@article{d963fef5d66c48529a97e217490d0499,
title = "Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: The need for trials",
abstract = "Laparoscopic approaches are increasingly being applied to colorectal surgical procedures. This is particularly true of benign disease indications. Colon and rectal cancer is the only intra-abdominal malignancy that is knowingly resected using laparoscopic techniques. Concerns initially existed regarding the magnitude of benefits from the laparoscopic approach. Even as these were being addressed, further concerns arose regarding the appropriateness of this technique in malignancy. This controversy was highlighted by reports of early tumor implants in trocar wounds. With careful technique, training, and experience, however, wound recurrences are rarely seen, suggesting that this phenomenon, in the clinical setting, is primarily technique-related. The ultimate measures of oncological outcomes are 5-year measures of overall survival and disease-free survival. Lack of rigorous evidence either condemning or supporting the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resulted in the establishment of several large-scale randomized prospective trials, all currently in progress, that aim to determine whether laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer results in oncological outcomes comparable with those of the open approach.",
author = "Young-fadok, {T. M.} and R. Talac and Heidi Nelson",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "94--101",
journal = "Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery",
issn = "1043-1489",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer

T2 - The need for trials

AU - Young-fadok, T. M.

AU - Talac, R.

AU - Nelson, Heidi

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Laparoscopic approaches are increasingly being applied to colorectal surgical procedures. This is particularly true of benign disease indications. Colon and rectal cancer is the only intra-abdominal malignancy that is knowingly resected using laparoscopic techniques. Concerns initially existed regarding the magnitude of benefits from the laparoscopic approach. Even as these were being addressed, further concerns arose regarding the appropriateness of this technique in malignancy. This controversy was highlighted by reports of early tumor implants in trocar wounds. With careful technique, training, and experience, however, wound recurrences are rarely seen, suggesting that this phenomenon, in the clinical setting, is primarily technique-related. The ultimate measures of oncological outcomes are 5-year measures of overall survival and disease-free survival. Lack of rigorous evidence either condemning or supporting the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resulted in the establishment of several large-scale randomized prospective trials, all currently in progress, that aim to determine whether laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer results in oncological outcomes comparable with those of the open approach.

AB - Laparoscopic approaches are increasingly being applied to colorectal surgical procedures. This is particularly true of benign disease indications. Colon and rectal cancer is the only intra-abdominal malignancy that is knowingly resected using laparoscopic techniques. Concerns initially existed regarding the magnitude of benefits from the laparoscopic approach. Even as these were being addressed, further concerns arose regarding the appropriateness of this technique in malignancy. This controversy was highlighted by reports of early tumor implants in trocar wounds. With careful technique, training, and experience, however, wound recurrences are rarely seen, suggesting that this phenomenon, in the clinical setting, is primarily technique-related. The ultimate measures of oncological outcomes are 5-year measures of overall survival and disease-free survival. Lack of rigorous evidence either condemning or supporting the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resulted in the establishment of several large-scale randomized prospective trials, all currently in progress, that aim to determine whether laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer results in oncological outcomes comparable with those of the open approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032976184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032976184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032976184

VL - 10

SP - 94

EP - 101

JO - Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery

JF - Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery

SN - 1043-1489

IS - 2

ER -