Lack of discriminant value of dyspepsia subgroups in patients referred for upper endoscopy

Nicholas J. Talley, Amy L. Weaver, Dixie L. Tesmer, Alan R. Zinsmeister

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

223 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The subdivision of undiagnosed patients with dyspepsia into symptomatic subgroups (ulcerlike, dysmotilitylike, refluxlike, and nonspecific) may give a clue to the underlying cause; however, the value of this approach in practice is unclear. This study aimed to determine the discriminant value of dyspeptic symptoms and combinations of these symptoms. Methods: A consecutive sample of 820 outpatients (median age, 62 years; 47% male) completed, before endoscopy, a validated questionnaire that measured 46 gastrointestinal symptoms. Results: Of patients with functional dyspepsia (n = 162), 17% had ulcerlike, 9% dysmotilitylike, and 16% refluxlike dyspepsia alone; 31% fell into two or more symptom subgroups; and 27% had nonspecific symptoms. A similar distribution of the dyspepsia subgroups was observed in patients without functional dyspepsia. Younger age, female gender, frequent upper abdominal pain, no (or sometimes) pain relief with antacid use, and infrequent vomiting were predictive of functional dyspepsia vs. all other diagnoses (at a specificity of 80%, the sensitivity was 60%). The dyspepsia subgroups were poor discriminators in a separate model for functional dyspepsia vs. all other diagnoses (at a specificity of 80%, the sensitivity was only 43%). Conclusions: The dyspepsia subgroups, as currently defined, appear to have little clinical utility and may be an inappropriate way of classifying dyspepsia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1378-1386
Number of pages9
JournalGastroenterology
Volume105
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Dyspepsia
Endoscopy
Sensitivity and Specificity
Antacids
Abdominal Pain
Vomiting
Outpatients
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Lack of discriminant value of dyspepsia subgroups in patients referred for upper endoscopy. / Talley, Nicholas J.; Weaver, Amy L.; Tesmer, Dixie L.; Zinsmeister, Alan R.

In: Gastroenterology, Vol. 105, No. 5, 1993, p. 1378-1386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Talley, Nicholas J. ; Weaver, Amy L. ; Tesmer, Dixie L. ; Zinsmeister, Alan R. / Lack of discriminant value of dyspepsia subgroups in patients referred for upper endoscopy. In: Gastroenterology. 1993 ; Vol. 105, No. 5. pp. 1378-1386.
@article{a3d9cb8cec4d4028b5e1cd56f7b963d6,
title = "Lack of discriminant value of dyspepsia subgroups in patients referred for upper endoscopy",
abstract = "Background: The subdivision of undiagnosed patients with dyspepsia into symptomatic subgroups (ulcerlike, dysmotilitylike, refluxlike, and nonspecific) may give a clue to the underlying cause; however, the value of this approach in practice is unclear. This study aimed to determine the discriminant value of dyspeptic symptoms and combinations of these symptoms. Methods: A consecutive sample of 820 outpatients (median age, 62 years; 47{\%} male) completed, before endoscopy, a validated questionnaire that measured 46 gastrointestinal symptoms. Results: Of patients with functional dyspepsia (n = 162), 17{\%} had ulcerlike, 9{\%} dysmotilitylike, and 16{\%} refluxlike dyspepsia alone; 31{\%} fell into two or more symptom subgroups; and 27{\%} had nonspecific symptoms. A similar distribution of the dyspepsia subgroups was observed in patients without functional dyspepsia. Younger age, female gender, frequent upper abdominal pain, no (or sometimes) pain relief with antacid use, and infrequent vomiting were predictive of functional dyspepsia vs. all other diagnoses (at a specificity of 80{\%}, the sensitivity was 60{\%}). The dyspepsia subgroups were poor discriminators in a separate model for functional dyspepsia vs. all other diagnoses (at a specificity of 80{\%}, the sensitivity was only 43{\%}). Conclusions: The dyspepsia subgroups, as currently defined, appear to have little clinical utility and may be an inappropriate way of classifying dyspepsia.",
author = "Talley, {Nicholas J.} and Weaver, {Amy L.} and Tesmer, {Dixie L.} and Zinsmeister, {Alan R.}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/0016-5085(93)90142-Y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "1378--1386",
journal = "Gastroenterology",
issn = "0016-5085",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lack of discriminant value of dyspepsia subgroups in patients referred for upper endoscopy

AU - Talley, Nicholas J.

AU - Weaver, Amy L.

AU - Tesmer, Dixie L.

AU - Zinsmeister, Alan R.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Background: The subdivision of undiagnosed patients with dyspepsia into symptomatic subgroups (ulcerlike, dysmotilitylike, refluxlike, and nonspecific) may give a clue to the underlying cause; however, the value of this approach in practice is unclear. This study aimed to determine the discriminant value of dyspeptic symptoms and combinations of these symptoms. Methods: A consecutive sample of 820 outpatients (median age, 62 years; 47% male) completed, before endoscopy, a validated questionnaire that measured 46 gastrointestinal symptoms. Results: Of patients with functional dyspepsia (n = 162), 17% had ulcerlike, 9% dysmotilitylike, and 16% refluxlike dyspepsia alone; 31% fell into two or more symptom subgroups; and 27% had nonspecific symptoms. A similar distribution of the dyspepsia subgroups was observed in patients without functional dyspepsia. Younger age, female gender, frequent upper abdominal pain, no (or sometimes) pain relief with antacid use, and infrequent vomiting were predictive of functional dyspepsia vs. all other diagnoses (at a specificity of 80%, the sensitivity was 60%). The dyspepsia subgroups were poor discriminators in a separate model for functional dyspepsia vs. all other diagnoses (at a specificity of 80%, the sensitivity was only 43%). Conclusions: The dyspepsia subgroups, as currently defined, appear to have little clinical utility and may be an inappropriate way of classifying dyspepsia.

AB - Background: The subdivision of undiagnosed patients with dyspepsia into symptomatic subgroups (ulcerlike, dysmotilitylike, refluxlike, and nonspecific) may give a clue to the underlying cause; however, the value of this approach in practice is unclear. This study aimed to determine the discriminant value of dyspeptic symptoms and combinations of these symptoms. Methods: A consecutive sample of 820 outpatients (median age, 62 years; 47% male) completed, before endoscopy, a validated questionnaire that measured 46 gastrointestinal symptoms. Results: Of patients with functional dyspepsia (n = 162), 17% had ulcerlike, 9% dysmotilitylike, and 16% refluxlike dyspepsia alone; 31% fell into two or more symptom subgroups; and 27% had nonspecific symptoms. A similar distribution of the dyspepsia subgroups was observed in patients without functional dyspepsia. Younger age, female gender, frequent upper abdominal pain, no (or sometimes) pain relief with antacid use, and infrequent vomiting were predictive of functional dyspepsia vs. all other diagnoses (at a specificity of 80%, the sensitivity was 60%). The dyspepsia subgroups were poor discriminators in a separate model for functional dyspepsia vs. all other diagnoses (at a specificity of 80%, the sensitivity was only 43%). Conclusions: The dyspepsia subgroups, as currently defined, appear to have little clinical utility and may be an inappropriate way of classifying dyspepsia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027489972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027489972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90142-Y

DO - 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90142-Y

M3 - Article

C2 - 8224642

AN - SCOPUS:0027489972

VL - 105

SP - 1378

EP - 1386

JO - Gastroenterology

JF - Gastroenterology

SN - 0016-5085

IS - 5

ER -