Lack of differential motor outcome with subthalamic nucleus region stimulation in Parkinson's disease

Aimen Kasasbeh, Osama A. Abulseoud, Joseph Y. Matsumoto, Squire Matthew Stead, Stephan J. Goerss, Bryan Klassen, John III Huston, Hoon Ki Min, Kendall H Lee, Mark A Frye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a viable therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). The impact of subthalamic nucleus (STN) lead placement (lateral versus medial) on motor outcome, however, has not been systematically evaluated. Forty-eight patients with PD underwent STN-DBS surgery and were evaluated postoperatively for 48 weeks for motor improvement as measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III (standardized motor examination) and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD). Postoperative MRI was used to identify the location of the active stimulating contact and motor outcome was analyzed. STN-DBS was associated with significant improvement in motor outcome as determined by a reduction in the UPDRS part III subscore from 34.44 ± 1.29 at baseline to 18.76 ± 1.06 at end visit (p < 0.0001) and a reduction in LEDD from 1721 ± 152 mg/day at baseline to 1134 ± 119 mg/day at end visit (p = 0.0024). Patients with stimulating contacts in the medial STN compared to the lateral STN did not demonstrate any significant differences in motor outcome (UPDRS, p = 0.5811; LEDD, p = 0.7341). No significant differences were found in motor outcome between patients with STN stimulation compared to stimulation of surrounding fiber tracts (p = 0.80). No significant difference in stimulation voltage was noted with respect to lead location. Our study did not find a significant effect for the location of active contact and motor outcome neither within the subregions of the STN nor between the STN and surrounding fibers. Further research is needed to better understand the neurophysiological basis for these results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1520-1526
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Neuroscience
Volume20
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Subthalamic Nucleus
Parkinson Disease
Deep Brain Stimulation
Levodopa

Keywords

  • Deep brain stimulation
  • Motor outcome
  • Subthalamic nucleus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Lack of differential motor outcome with subthalamic nucleus region stimulation in Parkinson's disease. / Kasasbeh, Aimen; Abulseoud, Osama A.; Matsumoto, Joseph Y.; Stead, Squire Matthew; Goerss, Stephan J.; Klassen, Bryan; Huston, John III; Min, Hoon Ki; Lee, Kendall H; Frye, Mark A.

In: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 20, No. 11, 11.2013, p. 1520-1526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9f7f7bf50c324be4940446071a66405d,
title = "Lack of differential motor outcome with subthalamic nucleus region stimulation in Parkinson's disease",
abstract = "Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a viable therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). The impact of subthalamic nucleus (STN) lead placement (lateral versus medial) on motor outcome, however, has not been systematically evaluated. Forty-eight patients with PD underwent STN-DBS surgery and were evaluated postoperatively for 48 weeks for motor improvement as measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III (standardized motor examination) and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD). Postoperative MRI was used to identify the location of the active stimulating contact and motor outcome was analyzed. STN-DBS was associated with significant improvement in motor outcome as determined by a reduction in the UPDRS part III subscore from 34.44 ± 1.29 at baseline to 18.76 ± 1.06 at end visit (p < 0.0001) and a reduction in LEDD from 1721 ± 152 mg/day at baseline to 1134 ± 119 mg/day at end visit (p = 0.0024). Patients with stimulating contacts in the medial STN compared to the lateral STN did not demonstrate any significant differences in motor outcome (UPDRS, p = 0.5811; LEDD, p = 0.7341). No significant differences were found in motor outcome between patients with STN stimulation compared to stimulation of surrounding fiber tracts (p = 0.80). No significant difference in stimulation voltage was noted with respect to lead location. Our study did not find a significant effect for the location of active contact and motor outcome neither within the subregions of the STN nor between the STN and surrounding fibers. Further research is needed to better understand the neurophysiological basis for these results.",
keywords = "Deep brain stimulation, Motor outcome, Subthalamic nucleus",
author = "Aimen Kasasbeh and Abulseoud, {Osama A.} and Matsumoto, {Joseph Y.} and Stead, {Squire Matthew} and Goerss, {Stephan J.} and Bryan Klassen and Huston, {John III} and Min, {Hoon Ki} and Lee, {Kendall H} and Frye, {Mark A}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jocn.2013.02.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1520--1526",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Neuroscience",
issn = "0967-5868",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lack of differential motor outcome with subthalamic nucleus region stimulation in Parkinson's disease

AU - Kasasbeh, Aimen

AU - Abulseoud, Osama A.

AU - Matsumoto, Joseph Y.

AU - Stead, Squire Matthew

AU - Goerss, Stephan J.

AU - Klassen, Bryan

AU - Huston, John III

AU - Min, Hoon Ki

AU - Lee, Kendall H

AU - Frye, Mark A

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a viable therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). The impact of subthalamic nucleus (STN) lead placement (lateral versus medial) on motor outcome, however, has not been systematically evaluated. Forty-eight patients with PD underwent STN-DBS surgery and were evaluated postoperatively for 48 weeks for motor improvement as measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III (standardized motor examination) and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD). Postoperative MRI was used to identify the location of the active stimulating contact and motor outcome was analyzed. STN-DBS was associated with significant improvement in motor outcome as determined by a reduction in the UPDRS part III subscore from 34.44 ± 1.29 at baseline to 18.76 ± 1.06 at end visit (p < 0.0001) and a reduction in LEDD from 1721 ± 152 mg/day at baseline to 1134 ± 119 mg/day at end visit (p = 0.0024). Patients with stimulating contacts in the medial STN compared to the lateral STN did not demonstrate any significant differences in motor outcome (UPDRS, p = 0.5811; LEDD, p = 0.7341). No significant differences were found in motor outcome between patients with STN stimulation compared to stimulation of surrounding fiber tracts (p = 0.80). No significant difference in stimulation voltage was noted with respect to lead location. Our study did not find a significant effect for the location of active contact and motor outcome neither within the subregions of the STN nor between the STN and surrounding fibers. Further research is needed to better understand the neurophysiological basis for these results.

AB - Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a viable therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). The impact of subthalamic nucleus (STN) lead placement (lateral versus medial) on motor outcome, however, has not been systematically evaluated. Forty-eight patients with PD underwent STN-DBS surgery and were evaluated postoperatively for 48 weeks for motor improvement as measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III (standardized motor examination) and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD). Postoperative MRI was used to identify the location of the active stimulating contact and motor outcome was analyzed. STN-DBS was associated with significant improvement in motor outcome as determined by a reduction in the UPDRS part III subscore from 34.44 ± 1.29 at baseline to 18.76 ± 1.06 at end visit (p < 0.0001) and a reduction in LEDD from 1721 ± 152 mg/day at baseline to 1134 ± 119 mg/day at end visit (p = 0.0024). Patients with stimulating contacts in the medial STN compared to the lateral STN did not demonstrate any significant differences in motor outcome (UPDRS, p = 0.5811; LEDD, p = 0.7341). No significant differences were found in motor outcome between patients with STN stimulation compared to stimulation of surrounding fiber tracts (p = 0.80). No significant difference in stimulation voltage was noted with respect to lead location. Our study did not find a significant effect for the location of active contact and motor outcome neither within the subregions of the STN nor between the STN and surrounding fibers. Further research is needed to better understand the neurophysiological basis for these results.

KW - Deep brain stimulation

KW - Motor outcome

KW - Subthalamic nucleus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886097109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886097109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.02.006

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1520

EP - 1526

JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

SN - 0967-5868

IS - 11

ER -