TY - JOUR
T1 - Kinematics of the elbow during wheelchair propulsion
T2 - A comparison of two wheelchairs and two stroking techniques
AU - Rudins, Andrew
AU - Laskowski, Edward R.
AU - Growney, Eric S.
AU - Cahalan, Thomas D.
AU - An, Kai Nan
N1 - Funding Information:
From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Drs. Rudins, Laskowski) and the Biomechanics Laboratory (Mr. Growney, Mr. Cahalan, Dr. An), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN. Submitted for publication October 8, 1996. Accepted in revised form March 17, 1997. Supported by Research Grant AR26287 from the National Institutes of Health. No commercial party having a direct or indirect interest in the subject matter of this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated. Reprint requests to Edward R. Laskowski, MD, Department of Physical Mecl-tine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. 0 1997 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 0003-9993/97/7811-4223$3.00/O
PY - 1997/11
Y1 - 1997/11
N2 - Objective: The kinematics of the elbow joint were studied for two types of wheelchairs and during two types of propulsive strokes. Participants: Ten serially selected healthy volunteers propelled a standard and a lightweight wheelchair on a roller system with both circular and pumping strokes. Design: Kinematic data for the wheelchair and the upper extremity were collected by an optical tracking system. These kinematic descriptors were subsequently time-normalized with a spline algorithm to provide a graphic description of the wheelchair strokes. Main Outcome Measures: Thirteen discrete variables were compared for the two chairs and the two propulsive strokes. Results: Total elbow motion ranged from 60.9°of flexion to 5.2°of extension. Maximal elbow flexion velocity ranged from 515.4°to 572.8°per second. Kinematic differences between the two wheelchairs were minimal, with a trend for 8.3°to 5.2°more elbow flexion in the lightweight wheelchair (p < .05), depending on the stroke used. With the use of any one chair, the style of the stroke had no significant effect on elbow kinematics, but the use of a pumping stroke did decrease propulsion arc by 12°to 14°(p < .05). Conclusion: No major differences regarding elbow kinematics were seen between the two types of wheelchairs. The pumping-stroke technique resulted in a shortened handrim contact arc.
AB - Objective: The kinematics of the elbow joint were studied for two types of wheelchairs and during two types of propulsive strokes. Participants: Ten serially selected healthy volunteers propelled a standard and a lightweight wheelchair on a roller system with both circular and pumping strokes. Design: Kinematic data for the wheelchair and the upper extremity were collected by an optical tracking system. These kinematic descriptors were subsequently time-normalized with a spline algorithm to provide a graphic description of the wheelchair strokes. Main Outcome Measures: Thirteen discrete variables were compared for the two chairs and the two propulsive strokes. Results: Total elbow motion ranged from 60.9°of flexion to 5.2°of extension. Maximal elbow flexion velocity ranged from 515.4°to 572.8°per second. Kinematic differences between the two wheelchairs were minimal, with a trend for 8.3°to 5.2°more elbow flexion in the lightweight wheelchair (p < .05), depending on the stroke used. With the use of any one chair, the style of the stroke had no significant effect on elbow kinematics, but the use of a pumping stroke did decrease propulsion arc by 12°to 14°(p < .05). Conclusion: No major differences regarding elbow kinematics were seen between the two types of wheelchairs. The pumping-stroke technique resulted in a shortened handrim contact arc.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030829255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030829255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90333-6
DO - 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90333-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 9365350
AN - SCOPUS:0030829255
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 78
SP - 1204
EP - 1210
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 11
ER -