TY - JOUR
T1 - IV fosphenytoin in obese patients
AU - Clark, Sarah L.
AU - Leloux, Megan R.
AU - Dierkhising, Ross A.
AU - Cascino, Gregory D.
AU - Hocker, Sara E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Academy of Neurology.
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - Background: Previous studies evaluated the disposition of IV phenytoin loading doses and found that obese patients had increased drug distribution into excess body weight, larger volumes of distribution, and longer half-lives when compared to their nonobese counterparts. We assess the safety and efficacy of fosphenytoin loading doses in patients with different body mass indices (BMIs). Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted in 410 patients who received fosphenytoin. Patients were divided into 2 groups: BMI <30 (nonobese) and BMI ≥30 (obese). Patient demographics, fosphenytoin dose administered in mg/kg body weight, renal and liver function tests, fosphenytoin drug levels, and pre- and post-fosphenytoin administration vital signs were collected to assess for adverse events. Necessity of additional antiepileptic loading doses was used as a surrogate for clinical efficacy. Results: The median dose of fosphenytoin administered was 19 mg/kg (interquartile range 15-20). The most frequently encountered adverse event was hypotension, which occurred in 39% of the cohort. Using a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons, there were no differences in adverse events between the 2 groups. The need for additional antiepileptic loading doses was not different between the 2 groups (p = 0.07). Conclusions: The incidence of adverse events and the need for repeat loading antiepileptic medications was similar between the 2 groups. From our findings, the patients in our study did not receive empiric loading dose adjustments and the current method of loading fosphenytoin achieves similar outcomes, regardless of the patient's BMI.
AB - Background: Previous studies evaluated the disposition of IV phenytoin loading doses and found that obese patients had increased drug distribution into excess body weight, larger volumes of distribution, and longer half-lives when compared to their nonobese counterparts. We assess the safety and efficacy of fosphenytoin loading doses in patients with different body mass indices (BMIs). Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted in 410 patients who received fosphenytoin. Patients were divided into 2 groups: BMI <30 (nonobese) and BMI ≥30 (obese). Patient demographics, fosphenytoin dose administered in mg/kg body weight, renal and liver function tests, fosphenytoin drug levels, and pre- and post-fosphenytoin administration vital signs were collected to assess for adverse events. Necessity of additional antiepileptic loading doses was used as a surrogate for clinical efficacy. Results: The median dose of fosphenytoin administered was 19 mg/kg (interquartile range 15-20). The most frequently encountered adverse event was hypotension, which occurred in 39% of the cohort. Using a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons, there were no differences in adverse events between the 2 groups. The need for additional antiepileptic loading doses was not different between the 2 groups (p = 0.07). Conclusions: The incidence of adverse events and the need for repeat loading antiepileptic medications was similar between the 2 groups. From our findings, the patients in our study did not receive empiric loading dose adjustments and the current method of loading fosphenytoin achieves similar outcomes, regardless of the patient's BMI.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012900091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012900091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000322
DO - 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000322
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85012900091
SN - 2163-0402
VL - 7
SP - 45
EP - 52
JO - Neurology: Clinical Practice
JF - Neurology: Clinical Practice
IS - 1
ER -