Is the Use of QOL Data Really Any Different than Other Medical Testing?

Michele Y. Halyard, Marlene H. Frost, Amylou Dueck, Jeff A Sloan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

QOL data and routine clinical data such as laboratory data, whether used in clinical practice or research, can be viewed by clinicians in the same way. Both provide important patient-related information using instruments which are reliable and valid. Both require that the clinician or researcher understand how to utilize and interpret the data and gain comfort with doing so through experience. It is through this repeated usage of QOL data that clinicians will, hopefully, come to accept QOL data as a routine and invaluable part of their practice and view it just as they view other clinical data. Whether it is a clinician looking at QOL data or laboratory data for the first time, or a clinical researcher including QOL data in a clinical trial for the first time, training, repetitive use, and experience is necessary to feel comfortable with integrating the data to recommend an appropriate clinical action or to capture the meaningful effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-271
Number of pages11
JournalCurrent Problems in Cancer
Volume30
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Clinical Trials
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Is the Use of QOL Data Really Any Different than Other Medical Testing? / Halyard, Michele Y.; Frost, Marlene H.; Dueck, Amylou; Sloan, Jeff A.

In: Current Problems in Cancer, Vol. 30, No. 6, 11.2006, p. 261-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Halyard, Michele Y. ; Frost, Marlene H. ; Dueck, Amylou ; Sloan, Jeff A. / Is the Use of QOL Data Really Any Different than Other Medical Testing?. In: Current Problems in Cancer. 2006 ; Vol. 30, No. 6. pp. 261-271.
@article{023f8ce72c6c48a2a105e028edc67b57,
title = "Is the Use of QOL Data Really Any Different than Other Medical Testing?",
abstract = "QOL data and routine clinical data such as laboratory data, whether used in clinical practice or research, can be viewed by clinicians in the same way. Both provide important patient-related information using instruments which are reliable and valid. Both require that the clinician or researcher understand how to utilize and interpret the data and gain comfort with doing so through experience. It is through this repeated usage of QOL data that clinicians will, hopefully, come to accept QOL data as a routine and invaluable part of their practice and view it just as they view other clinical data. Whether it is a clinician looking at QOL data or laboratory data for the first time, or a clinical researcher including QOL data in a clinical trial for the first time, training, repetitive use, and experience is necessary to feel comfortable with integrating the data to recommend an appropriate clinical action or to capture the meaningful effect.",
author = "Halyard, {Michele Y.} and Frost, {Marlene H.} and Amylou Dueck and Sloan, {Jeff A}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2006.08.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "261--271",
journal = "Current Problems in Cancer",
issn = "0147-0272",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the Use of QOL Data Really Any Different than Other Medical Testing?

AU - Halyard, Michele Y.

AU - Frost, Marlene H.

AU - Dueck, Amylou

AU - Sloan, Jeff A

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - QOL data and routine clinical data such as laboratory data, whether used in clinical practice or research, can be viewed by clinicians in the same way. Both provide important patient-related information using instruments which are reliable and valid. Both require that the clinician or researcher understand how to utilize and interpret the data and gain comfort with doing so through experience. It is through this repeated usage of QOL data that clinicians will, hopefully, come to accept QOL data as a routine and invaluable part of their practice and view it just as they view other clinical data. Whether it is a clinician looking at QOL data or laboratory data for the first time, or a clinical researcher including QOL data in a clinical trial for the first time, training, repetitive use, and experience is necessary to feel comfortable with integrating the data to recommend an appropriate clinical action or to capture the meaningful effect.

AB - QOL data and routine clinical data such as laboratory data, whether used in clinical practice or research, can be viewed by clinicians in the same way. Both provide important patient-related information using instruments which are reliable and valid. Both require that the clinician or researcher understand how to utilize and interpret the data and gain comfort with doing so through experience. It is through this repeated usage of QOL data that clinicians will, hopefully, come to accept QOL data as a routine and invaluable part of their practice and view it just as they view other clinical data. Whether it is a clinician looking at QOL data or laboratory data for the first time, or a clinical researcher including QOL data in a clinical trial for the first time, training, repetitive use, and experience is necessary to feel comfortable with integrating the data to recommend an appropriate clinical action or to capture the meaningful effect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751092526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751092526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2006.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2006.08.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 17123878

AN - SCOPUS:33751092526

VL - 30

SP - 261

EP - 271

JO - Current Problems in Cancer

JF - Current Problems in Cancer

SN - 0147-0272

IS - 6

ER -