Is Speed a Desirable Difficulty for Learning Procedures? An Initial Exploration of the Effects of Chronometric Pressure

Becca L. Gas, Eeeln H. Buckarma, David Allan Cook, David R. Farley, Martin V. Pusic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether "chronometric pressure" (i.e., a verbal prompt to increase speed) could predictably alter medical learners' speed-accuracy trade-off during a simulated surgical task, thus modifying the challenge. Method The authors performed a single-task, interrupted time-series study, enrolling surgery residents and medical students from two institutions in September and October 2015. Participants completed 10 repetitions of a simulated blood vessel ligation (placement of two ligatures 1 cm apart). Between repetitions 5 and 6, participants were verbally encouraged to complete the next repetition 20% faster than the previous one. Outcomes included time and accuracy (ligature tightness, placement distance). Data were analyzed using random-coefficients spline models. Results The authors analyzed data from 78 participants (25 medical students, 16 first-year residents, 37 senior [second-year or higher] residents). Overall, time decreased from the 1st (mean [standard deviation] 39.8 seconds [18.4]) to the 10th (29.6 [12.5]) repetition. The spline model showed a decrease in time between repetitions 5 and 6 of 8.6 seconds (95% confidence interval: -11.1, -6.1). The faster time corresponded with declines in ligature tightness (unadjusted difference -19%; decrease in odds 0.86 [0.76, 0.98]) and placement accuracy (unadjusted difference -5%; decrease in odds 0.86 [0.75, 0.99]). Significant differences in the speed-accuracy trade-off were seen by training level, with senior residents demonstrating the greatest decline in accuracy as speed increased. Conclusions Chronometric pressure influenced the speed-accuracy trade-off and modified the challenge level in a simulated surgical task. It may help unmask correctable deficiencies or false plateaus in learners' skill development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)920-928
Number of pages9
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume93
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

resident
learning
medical student
surgery
time series
confidence
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Is Speed a Desirable Difficulty for Learning Procedures? An Initial Exploration of the Effects of Chronometric Pressure. / Gas, Becca L.; Buckarma, Eeeln H.; Cook, David Allan; Farley, David R.; Pusic, Martin V.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 93, No. 6, 01.06.2018, p. 920-928.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gas, Becca L. ; Buckarma, Eeeln H. ; Cook, David Allan ; Farley, David R. ; Pusic, Martin V. / Is Speed a Desirable Difficulty for Learning Procedures? An Initial Exploration of the Effects of Chronometric Pressure. In: Academic Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 93, No. 6. pp. 920-928.
@article{50d271225ea04922988209f157a1c144,
title = "Is Speed a Desirable Difficulty for Learning Procedures? An Initial Exploration of the Effects of Chronometric Pressure",
abstract = "Purpose To determine whether {"}chronometric pressure{"} (i.e., a verbal prompt to increase speed) could predictably alter medical learners' speed-accuracy trade-off during a simulated surgical task, thus modifying the challenge. Method The authors performed a single-task, interrupted time-series study, enrolling surgery residents and medical students from two institutions in September and October 2015. Participants completed 10 repetitions of a simulated blood vessel ligation (placement of two ligatures 1 cm apart). Between repetitions 5 and 6, participants were verbally encouraged to complete the next repetition 20{\%} faster than the previous one. Outcomes included time and accuracy (ligature tightness, placement distance). Data were analyzed using random-coefficients spline models. Results The authors analyzed data from 78 participants (25 medical students, 16 first-year residents, 37 senior [second-year or higher] residents). Overall, time decreased from the 1st (mean [standard deviation] 39.8 seconds [18.4]) to the 10th (29.6 [12.5]) repetition. The spline model showed a decrease in time between repetitions 5 and 6 of 8.6 seconds (95{\%} confidence interval: -11.1, -6.1). The faster time corresponded with declines in ligature tightness (unadjusted difference -19{\%}; decrease in odds 0.86 [0.76, 0.98]) and placement accuracy (unadjusted difference -5{\%}; decrease in odds 0.86 [0.75, 0.99]). Significant differences in the speed-accuracy trade-off were seen by training level, with senior residents demonstrating the greatest decline in accuracy as speed increased. Conclusions Chronometric pressure influenced the speed-accuracy trade-off and modified the challenge level in a simulated surgical task. It may help unmask correctable deficiencies or false plateaus in learners' skill development.",
author = "Gas, {Becca L.} and Buckarma, {Eeeln H.} and Cook, {David Allan} and Farley, {David R.} and Pusic, {Martin V.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000002167",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "920--928",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is Speed a Desirable Difficulty for Learning Procedures? An Initial Exploration of the Effects of Chronometric Pressure

AU - Gas, Becca L.

AU - Buckarma, Eeeln H.

AU - Cook, David Allan

AU - Farley, David R.

AU - Pusic, Martin V.

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Purpose To determine whether "chronometric pressure" (i.e., a verbal prompt to increase speed) could predictably alter medical learners' speed-accuracy trade-off during a simulated surgical task, thus modifying the challenge. Method The authors performed a single-task, interrupted time-series study, enrolling surgery residents and medical students from two institutions in September and October 2015. Participants completed 10 repetitions of a simulated blood vessel ligation (placement of two ligatures 1 cm apart). Between repetitions 5 and 6, participants were verbally encouraged to complete the next repetition 20% faster than the previous one. Outcomes included time and accuracy (ligature tightness, placement distance). Data were analyzed using random-coefficients spline models. Results The authors analyzed data from 78 participants (25 medical students, 16 first-year residents, 37 senior [second-year or higher] residents). Overall, time decreased from the 1st (mean [standard deviation] 39.8 seconds [18.4]) to the 10th (29.6 [12.5]) repetition. The spline model showed a decrease in time between repetitions 5 and 6 of 8.6 seconds (95% confidence interval: -11.1, -6.1). The faster time corresponded with declines in ligature tightness (unadjusted difference -19%; decrease in odds 0.86 [0.76, 0.98]) and placement accuracy (unadjusted difference -5%; decrease in odds 0.86 [0.75, 0.99]). Significant differences in the speed-accuracy trade-off were seen by training level, with senior residents demonstrating the greatest decline in accuracy as speed increased. Conclusions Chronometric pressure influenced the speed-accuracy trade-off and modified the challenge level in a simulated surgical task. It may help unmask correctable deficiencies or false plateaus in learners' skill development.

AB - Purpose To determine whether "chronometric pressure" (i.e., a verbal prompt to increase speed) could predictably alter medical learners' speed-accuracy trade-off during a simulated surgical task, thus modifying the challenge. Method The authors performed a single-task, interrupted time-series study, enrolling surgery residents and medical students from two institutions in September and October 2015. Participants completed 10 repetitions of a simulated blood vessel ligation (placement of two ligatures 1 cm apart). Between repetitions 5 and 6, participants were verbally encouraged to complete the next repetition 20% faster than the previous one. Outcomes included time and accuracy (ligature tightness, placement distance). Data were analyzed using random-coefficients spline models. Results The authors analyzed data from 78 participants (25 medical students, 16 first-year residents, 37 senior [second-year or higher] residents). Overall, time decreased from the 1st (mean [standard deviation] 39.8 seconds [18.4]) to the 10th (29.6 [12.5]) repetition. The spline model showed a decrease in time between repetitions 5 and 6 of 8.6 seconds (95% confidence interval: -11.1, -6.1). The faster time corresponded with declines in ligature tightness (unadjusted difference -19%; decrease in odds 0.86 [0.76, 0.98]) and placement accuracy (unadjusted difference -5%; decrease in odds 0.86 [0.75, 0.99]). Significant differences in the speed-accuracy trade-off were seen by training level, with senior residents demonstrating the greatest decline in accuracy as speed increased. Conclusions Chronometric pressure influenced the speed-accuracy trade-off and modified the challenge level in a simulated surgical task. It may help unmask correctable deficiencies or false plateaus in learners' skill development.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053899630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053899630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002167

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002167

M3 - Article

C2 - 29419552

AN - SCOPUS:85053899630

VL - 93

SP - 920

EP - 928

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 6

ER -