Is “Rb3C60” really Rb3C60? The NMR T, T′ problem

K. Gorny, C. Hahm, J. A. Martindale, S. Yu, C. H. Pennington, D. R. Buffinger, R. P. Ziebarth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

A priori theoretical considerations lead one to expect that Rb3C60 is a Mott-Hubbard insulator. This has led to the proposal that the superconductor “ Rb3C60” is, in fact, Rb3-εC60 (ε0.06) and, furthermore, that the vacancies are associated with an unexpected, robust splitting in 87Rb NMR. We demonstrate that vacancies, if present, are unrelated to observed NMR splittings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5118-5121
Number of pages4
JournalPhysical Review Letters
Volume79
Issue number25
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is “Rb<sub>3</sub>C<sub>60</sub>” really Rb<sub>3</sub>C<sub>60</sub>? The NMR T, T′ problem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Gorny, K., Hahm, C., Martindale, J. A., Yu, S., Pennington, C. H., Buffinger, D. R., & Ziebarth, R. P. (1997). Is “Rb3C60” really Rb3C60? The NMR T, T′ problem. Physical Review Letters, 79(25), 5118-5121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.5118